Prognostic significance of serum inflammatory markers in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing revascularization therapy.

Ding-Zhong Tang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xin-Xin Chen, Song-He Yin, Lei Zhang, Xue-Lin Liang, Guo-Jun Luo, Chun-Li Yu
{"title":"Prognostic significance of serum inflammatory markers in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing revascularization therapy.","authors":"Ding-Zhong Tang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xin-Xin Chen, Song-He Yin, Lei Zhang, Xue-Lin Liang, Guo-Jun Luo, Chun-Li Yu","doi":"10.3233/CH-242435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum inflammatory factor levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing revascularization therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 94 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent revascularization therapy at our hospital. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score assessed three months post-treatment. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with a poor prognosis (mRS score > 2) and those with a good prognosis (mRS score≤2). The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of revascularization treatment received: thrombus extraction or intravenous thrombolysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors associated with the prognosis of patients treated with recanalization for acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 94 patients, 59 had a good prognosis, and 35 had a poor prognosis. At admission, the patients in the good prognosis group exhibited lower NIHSS scores, shorter hospital stays, fewer previous cardiac events, lower LDL levels, fasting glucose, IL-6, and TNF-a compared to those in the poor prognosis group (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified TNF-a (odd ratio (OD), 1.623; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.282-1.933; P = 0.035) and IL-6 (OD, 1.055; 95% CI, 1.024-1.088, P = 0.023) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients after revascularization. Additionally, pre-hospital NIHSS scores, IL-6, and TNF-a levels were significantly lower in the good prognosis group compared to the poor prognosis group, with these differences being statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IL-6 and TNF-α may serve as prognostic markers for outcomes following revascularization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, including those receiving intravenous thrombolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-242435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum inflammatory factor levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing revascularization therapy.

Methods: The study included 94 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent revascularization therapy at our hospital. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score assessed three months post-treatment. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with a poor prognosis (mRS score > 2) and those with a good prognosis (mRS score≤2). The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of revascularization treatment received: thrombus extraction or intravenous thrombolysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors associated with the prognosis of patients treated with recanalization for acute ischemic stroke.

Results: Among the 94 patients, 59 had a good prognosis, and 35 had a poor prognosis. At admission, the patients in the good prognosis group exhibited lower NIHSS scores, shorter hospital stays, fewer previous cardiac events, lower LDL levels, fasting glucose, IL-6, and TNF-a compared to those in the poor prognosis group (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified TNF-a (odd ratio (OD), 1.623; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.282-1.933; P = 0.035) and IL-6 (OD, 1.055; 95% CI, 1.024-1.088, P = 0.023) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients after revascularization. Additionally, pre-hospital NIHSS scores, IL-6, and TNF-a levels were significantly lower in the good prognosis group compared to the poor prognosis group, with these differences being statistically significant.

Conclusion: IL-6 and TNF-α may serve as prognostic markers for outcomes following revascularization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, including those receiving intravenous thrombolysis.

接受血管重建治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者血清炎症指标的预后意义。
研究目的本研究旨在评估接受血管重建治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者血清炎症因子水平的预后意义:研究纳入了 94 名在我院接受血管重建治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。主要结果是治疗后三个月的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分。患者被分为两组:预后不良(mRS 评分大于 2 分)和预后良好(mRS 评分小于 2 分)。根据患者接受的血管再通治疗类型分为两组:血栓抽取或静脉溶栓。采用逻辑回归分析确定与急性缺血性脑卒中再通治疗患者预后相关的独立风险因素:94 名患者中,59 人预后良好,35 人预后不良。入院时,与预后不良组相比,预后良好组患者的 NIHSS 评分较低、住院时间较短、既往心脏事件较少,低密度脂蛋白水平、空腹血糖、IL-6 和 TNF-a 均较低(均为 PIL-6和TNF-α可作为急性缺血性卒中患者(包括接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者)血管重建治疗后预后的标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信