[Contemporary treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Thomas Hilser, Christopher Darr, Umut-Ulas Yesilyurt, Niklas Klümper, Katrin Schlack, Viktor Grünwald
{"title":"[Contemporary treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma].","authors":"Thomas Hilser, Christopher Darr, Umut-Ulas Yesilyurt, Niklas Klümper, Katrin Schlack, Viktor Grünwald","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in Germany with an increasing incidence. Drug therapy is indicated in relapsed or metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The article is based on the content of the recent guidelines and a selective literature search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapies based on a checkpoint inhibitor are the current standard in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The median overall survival could thus be extended to > 50 months. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is used for risk classification. When selecting a suitable combination therapy, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages for each individual patient. There is currently no standard for follow-up therapies. So far, combination therapies have not shown any significant advantage in second-line treatment. It is recommended to switch to a substance that has not yet been used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, one purely immuno-oncology combination and four combinations of one immune checkpoint inhibitor and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are approved for first-line therapy in Germany. The added value of further intensification of therapy, in particular through triple combinations or further combination therapy in the second line, has not yet been proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in Germany with an increasing incidence. Drug therapy is indicated in relapsed or metastatic disease.

Materials and methods: The article is based on the content of the recent guidelines and a selective literature search.

Results: Combination therapies based on a checkpoint inhibitor are the current standard in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The median overall survival could thus be extended to > 50 months. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is used for risk classification. When selecting a suitable combination therapy, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages for each individual patient. There is currently no standard for follow-up therapies. So far, combination therapies have not shown any significant advantage in second-line treatment. It is recommended to switch to a substance that has not yet been used.

Conclusions: Currently, one purely immuno-oncology combination and four combinations of one immune checkpoint inhibitor and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are approved for first-line therapy in Germany. The added value of further intensification of therapy, in particular through triple combinations or further combination therapy in the second line, has not yet been proven.

[转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌的当代治疗]。
背景:肾细胞癌是德国最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,发病率不断上升。药物治疗适用于复发或转移性疾病:文章基于最新指南的内容和选择性文献检索:结果:基于检查点抑制剂的联合疗法是目前转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的标准。因此,中位总生存期可延长至 50 个月以上。国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)评分用于风险分类。在选择合适的联合疗法时,必须考虑每位患者的利弊。目前还没有后续疗法的标准。到目前为止,联合疗法在二线治疗中还没有显示出明显的优势。建议改用尚未使用过的物质:目前,德国批准了一种纯免疫肿瘤学联合疗法和四种由一种免疫检查点抑制剂和一种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)组成的联合疗法用于一线治疗。进一步加强治疗,特别是通过三联疗法或二线进一步联合治疗的附加值尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信