{"title":"Internet Health Resources for Diabetic Foot Search: The Content, Quality, and Readability of Information on Web Sites.","authors":"Mehmet Burtaç Eren, Feyza Yildiz Aytekin","doi":"10.7547/21-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the incidence of diabetes mellitus increases, the incidence of diabetic foot also increases. This situation, which may lead to devastating complications and progress to limb loss for patients, exposes patients and their social environments to a big crisis. Thus, patients may seek secondary opinions from online sources about information they initially obtained from health institutions. We aimed to evaluate the information content related to diabetic foot on the Internet that is probably used by patients for Internet searching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After software optimization and reset, related queries with the keyword diabetic foot were determined on Google Trends. Selected keywords were searched in three search engines, and the results were examined. Web sites were classified into five subcategories (nongovernmental health institution, governmental institution, academic, blog, and university) and evaluated with an information content scale (ICS) based on the literature, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, and presence of the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct certificate. The search engines, keywords, and Web site subcategories were investigated with the evaluation criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of finding Web sites eligible for assessment, the Google search engine listed more eligible Web sites than did Bing and Yahoo. Concerning the ICS, there was no significant difference between search engines for total scores (P > .05). Concerning ICS diagnosis and evaluation and ICS total score, academic Web sites scored significantly higher than other subcategories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results that can be obtained with an Internet search for diabetic foot depend on the proper keyword selection, Web site type, and search engine to help patients reach more appropriate content.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"114 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/21-155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As the incidence of diabetes mellitus increases, the incidence of diabetic foot also increases. This situation, which may lead to devastating complications and progress to limb loss for patients, exposes patients and their social environments to a big crisis. Thus, patients may seek secondary opinions from online sources about information they initially obtained from health institutions. We aimed to evaluate the information content related to diabetic foot on the Internet that is probably used by patients for Internet searching.
Methods: After software optimization and reset, related queries with the keyword diabetic foot were determined on Google Trends. Selected keywords were searched in three search engines, and the results were examined. Web sites were classified into five subcategories (nongovernmental health institution, governmental institution, academic, blog, and university) and evaluated with an information content scale (ICS) based on the literature, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, and presence of the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct certificate. The search engines, keywords, and Web site subcategories were investigated with the evaluation criteria.
Results: In terms of finding Web sites eligible for assessment, the Google search engine listed more eligible Web sites than did Bing and Yahoo. Concerning the ICS, there was no significant difference between search engines for total scores (P > .05). Concerning ICS diagnosis and evaluation and ICS total score, academic Web sites scored significantly higher than other subcategories.
Conclusions: Results that can be obtained with an Internet search for diabetic foot depend on the proper keyword selection, Web site type, and search engine to help patients reach more appropriate content.
背景:随着糖尿病发病率的增加,糖尿病足的发病率也随之增加。这种情况可能会导致破坏性并发症,进而导致患者失去肢体,使患者及其社会环境面临巨大危机。因此,患者可能会就最初从医疗机构获得的信息从网上寻求第二意见。我们的目的是评估互联网上与糖尿病足相关的信息内容,这些内容可能被患者用于互联网搜索:经过软件优化和重置后,在谷歌趋势上确定了与关键词糖尿病足相关的查询。在三个搜索引擎中搜索选定的关键词,并对搜索结果进行检查。网站被分为五个子类别(非政府医疗机构、政府机构、学术机构、博客和大学),并根据文献、《美国医学会杂志》基准标准、Flesch-Kincaid 可读性测试以及是否获得 Health On the Net Foundation 行为准则证书等信息内容量表(ICS)进行评估。根据评估标准对搜索引擎、关键词和网站子类别进行了调查:结果:在寻找符合评估标准的网站方面,谷歌搜索引擎比必应和雅虎搜索引擎列出了更多符合评估标准的网站。关于 ICS,不同搜索引擎的总分没有显著差异(P > .05)。关于 ICS 诊断和评估以及 ICS 总分,学术网站的得分明显高于其他子类别:结论:糖尿病足的互联网搜索结果取决于适当的关键词选择、网站类型和搜索引擎,以帮助患者获得更合适的内容。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.