Classifiability Analysis of Spectroscopic Profiling Datasets in Food Safety-related Discriminative Tasks

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Yinsheng Zhang , Xudong Yang , Zhengyong Zhang , Haiyan Wang
{"title":"Classifiability Analysis of Spectroscopic Profiling Datasets in Food Safety-related Discriminative Tasks","authors":"Yinsheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xudong Yang ,&nbsp;Zhengyong Zhang ,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Discriminative tasks, i.e., the identification of different food materials, brands, and origins, have become an essential part of food safety control. In recent years, spectroscopic profiling combined with machine learning is becoming popular for food-related discriminative tasks, but finding an appropriate classification model can be challenging. Compared to the current “trial-and-error” practice, this paper proposes a dedicated two-step classifiability analysis framework to address this issue. The first step collects more than 90 diversified metrics to measure the dataset separability from different perspectives. The second step synthesizes these metrics into a quantitative score using meta-learner and decomposition-based strategies. Finally, two Raman spectroscopic profiling case studies were conducted to validate the method, demonstrating higher scores for the easily separable liquor dataset (around 1.0) compared to the more challenging table salt dataset (&lt;0.5). This score can guide researchers to determine the required model complexity and assess the adequacy of the current physio-chemical profiling instrument. We expected the classifiability analysis framework proposed in this research to be generalized to a wide range of machine learning applications within the realm of food, where data-driven classification or discriminative tasks are involved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 1","pages":"Article 100407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discriminative tasks, i.e., the identification of different food materials, brands, and origins, have become an essential part of food safety control. In recent years, spectroscopic profiling combined with machine learning is becoming popular for food-related discriminative tasks, but finding an appropriate classification model can be challenging. Compared to the current “trial-and-error” practice, this paper proposes a dedicated two-step classifiability analysis framework to address this issue. The first step collects more than 90 diversified metrics to measure the dataset separability from different perspectives. The second step synthesizes these metrics into a quantitative score using meta-learner and decomposition-based strategies. Finally, two Raman spectroscopic profiling case studies were conducted to validate the method, demonstrating higher scores for the easily separable liquor dataset (around 1.0) compared to the more challenging table salt dataset (<0.5). This score can guide researchers to determine the required model complexity and assess the adequacy of the current physio-chemical profiling instrument. We expected the classifiability analysis framework proposed in this research to be generalized to a wide range of machine learning applications within the realm of food, where data-driven classification or discriminative tasks are involved.
食品安全相关判别任务中光谱分析数据集的可分类性分析。
鉴别任务,即识别不同的食品原料、品牌和产地,已成为食品安全控制的重要组成部分。近年来,光谱分析与机器学习相结合正逐渐成为食品相关判别任务的流行方法,但要找到一个合适的分类模型可能具有挑战性。与目前的 "试错 "做法相比,本文提出了一个专门的两步可分类性分析框架来解决这一问题。第一步收集 90 多个不同的指标,从不同角度衡量数据集的可分性。第二步使用元学习器和基于分解的策略将这些指标综合为一个量化分数。最后,进行了两项拉曼光谱分析案例研究来验证该方法,结果表明,与更具挑战性的食盐数据集(< 0.5)相比,易于分离的白酒数据集得分更高(约 1.0)。这个分数可以指导研究人员确定所需的模型复杂度,并评估当前理化分析仪器的适当性。我们希望本研究提出的可分类性分析框架能够推广到食品领域中涉及数据驱动分类或判别任务的各种机器学习应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信