Peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Siddharth Shanbhag, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Carina Kampleitner, Stein-Atle Lie, Reinhard Gruber, Kamal Mustafa, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"Peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs.","authors":"Siddharth Shanbhag, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Carina Kampleitner, Stein-Atle Lie, Reinhard Gruber, Kamal Mustafa, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.1186/s40729-024-00572-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the current literature to answer the focused question: in the experimental pig model (population), which types of peri-implant bone defects (exposure) have been used evaluate different modes of therapy and what is their capacity for spontaneous healing and regeneration (outcome)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for studies reporting peri-implant bone defects in the maxillae or mandibles of pigs. Those studies which reported a control group of untreated defects with assessment of spontaneous regeneration [new bone area (BA)] and/or re-osseointegration [new bone-to-implant contact (BIC)] via quantitative radiography or histomorphometry were included in a random effects meta-analysis for the outcomes BA and BIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 21 studies, mostly performed in the mandibles of minipigs, were included. Most studies reported 'acute' intrabony (circumferential and/or dehiscence; n = 12) or supra-alveolar defects (horizontal; n = 4). Five studies attempted to induce 'chronic' peri-implantitis lesions using ligatures with conflicting results. Meta-analyses revealed pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) of 48.07% BIC (30.14-66%) and 64.31% BA (42.71-85.91%) in intrabony defects, and 52.09% BIC (41.83-62.35%) and 28.62% BA (12.97-44.28%) in supra-alveolar defects. Heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was high (I<sup>2</sup> > 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence for peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs is mainly based on acute intrabony defects, which demonstrate a high capacity for spontaneous regeneration and re-osseointegration. The evidence for chronic peri-implantitis is limited and does not clearly indicate a spontaneous progression of the disease in this animal model.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00572-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To review the current literature to answer the focused question: in the experimental pig model (population), which types of peri-implant bone defects (exposure) have been used evaluate different modes of therapy and what is their capacity for spontaneous healing and regeneration (outcome)?

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for studies reporting peri-implant bone defects in the maxillae or mandibles of pigs. Those studies which reported a control group of untreated defects with assessment of spontaneous regeneration [new bone area (BA)] and/or re-osseointegration [new bone-to-implant contact (BIC)] via quantitative radiography or histomorphometry were included in a random effects meta-analysis for the outcomes BA and BIC.

Results: Overall, 21 studies, mostly performed in the mandibles of minipigs, were included. Most studies reported 'acute' intrabony (circumferential and/or dehiscence; n = 12) or supra-alveolar defects (horizontal; n = 4). Five studies attempted to induce 'chronic' peri-implantitis lesions using ligatures with conflicting results. Meta-analyses revealed pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) of 48.07% BIC (30.14-66%) and 64.31% BA (42.71-85.91%) in intrabony defects, and 52.09% BIC (41.83-62.35%) and 28.62% BA (12.97-44.28%) in supra-alveolar defects. Heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was high (I2 > 90%).

Conclusion: Current evidence for peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs is mainly based on acute intrabony defects, which demonstrate a high capacity for spontaneous regeneration and re-osseointegration. The evidence for chronic peri-implantitis is limited and does not clearly indicate a spontaneous progression of the disease in this animal model.

猪种植体周围的骨再生。
目的:综述现有文献以回答以下问题:在实验猪模型(群体)中,哪些类型的种植体周围骨缺损(暴露)已被用于评估不同的治疗模式,其自发愈合和再生能力如何(结果)?按照 PRISMA 指南,在电子数据库中搜索了报告猪上颌骨或下颌骨种植体周围骨缺损的研究。通过定量放射摄影或组织形态测量评估自发再生[新骨面积 (BA)]和/或再骨结合[新骨与种植体接触 (BIC)]的结果:结果:共纳入了 21 项研究,大部分是在小型猪的下颌骨中进行的。大多数研究报告了 "急性 "骨内缺损(周向缺损和/或开裂;n = 12)或牙槽上缺损(水平缺损;n = 4)。有五项研究尝试使用结扎诱导 "慢性 "种植体周围炎病变,结果相互矛盾。元分析显示,牙槽骨内缺损的集合估计值(95% 置信区间)为 48.07% BIC(30.14-66%)和 64.31% BA(42.71-85.91%),牙槽骨上缺损的集合估计值为 52.09% BIC(41.83-62.35%)和 28.62% BA(12.97-44.28%)。荟萃分析的异质性很高(I2 > 90%):目前有关猪种植体周围骨再生的证据主要基于急性骨内缺损,这些缺损显示出很高的自发再生和再骨结合能力。有关慢性种植体周围炎的证据很有限,而且没有明确表明这种动物模型中的疾病会自发发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信