The effect of once-daily vs. twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation on suicidal ideation in treatment-resistant depression.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lorina Zapf, Tyler S Kaster, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Jonathan Downar, Daniel M Blumberger
{"title":"The effect of once-daily vs. twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation on suicidal ideation in treatment-resistant depression.","authors":"Lorina Zapf, Tyler S Kaster, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Jonathan Downar, Daniel M Blumberger","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01929-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has demonstrated potential in reducing suicidal ideation (SI) in patients with depression, however, stimulation protocols vary greatly across studies. For this secondary analysis, data from a three-site double-blind, randomized and sham-controlled clinical trial was analyzed to investigate the efficacy of a once-daily versus twice-daily iTBS protocol in the treatment of SI in patients with treatment resistant depression. Secondarily we aimed to explore the associations among SI, anhedonia and quality of life (QOL) measures. The primary outcome for this analysis was SI, which was assessed by computing an average score from four suicidality items on separate depression scales. 158 participants who experienced some degree of SI at baseline were included in the analysis. After 10 days of treatment, 15 (18.3%) participants from the once-daily group and 19 (25%) from the twice-daily group achieved remission from SI which was defined as a SI score of 0. After 30 days of treatment the remission rates were 27 (32.9%) and 30 (39.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in remission rates between the groups. Moderate correlations between change in SI and change in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, correlations between change in SI, anhedonia and QOL were observed that remained significant after controlling for change in depressive symptoms. Achieving remission from SI appears to be at least partially correlated to the anti-depressant effect of iTBS. Further studies investigating optimal treatment protocols for the treatment of suicidality with different iTBS schedules are urgently needed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02729792 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02729792 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01929-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has demonstrated potential in reducing suicidal ideation (SI) in patients with depression, however, stimulation protocols vary greatly across studies. For this secondary analysis, data from a three-site double-blind, randomized and sham-controlled clinical trial was analyzed to investigate the efficacy of a once-daily versus twice-daily iTBS protocol in the treatment of SI in patients with treatment resistant depression. Secondarily we aimed to explore the associations among SI, anhedonia and quality of life (QOL) measures. The primary outcome for this analysis was SI, which was assessed by computing an average score from four suicidality items on separate depression scales. 158 participants who experienced some degree of SI at baseline were included in the analysis. After 10 days of treatment, 15 (18.3%) participants from the once-daily group and 19 (25%) from the twice-daily group achieved remission from SI which was defined as a SI score of 0. After 30 days of treatment the remission rates were 27 (32.9%) and 30 (39.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in remission rates between the groups. Moderate correlations between change in SI and change in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, correlations between change in SI, anhedonia and QOL were observed that remained significant after controlling for change in depressive symptoms. Achieving remission from SI appears to be at least partially correlated to the anti-depressant effect of iTBS. Further studies investigating optimal treatment protocols for the treatment of suicidality with different iTBS schedules are urgently needed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02729792 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02729792 ).

每日一次与每日两次间歇性θ脉冲刺激对耐药抑郁症患者自杀意念的影响。
间歇性θ脉冲刺激(iTBS)在减少抑郁症患者自杀意念(SI)方面的潜力已得到证实,但不同研究的刺激方案差异很大。在这项二次分析中,我们分析了一项三地双盲、随机和假对照临床试验的数据,以研究每天一次与每天两次的 iTBS 方案对治疗耐药抑郁症患者 SI 的疗效。其次,我们还旨在探索 SI、失乐症和生活质量(QOL)指标之间的关联。本次分析的主要结果是SI,通过计算不同抑郁量表中四个自杀倾向项目的平均分来评估。158 名在基线时经历过一定程度 SI 的参与者被纳入分析。经过 10 天的治疗后,每天一次组和每天两次组分别有 15 人(18.3%)和 19 人(25%)实现了 SI 缓解,即 SI 得分为 0。两组的缓解率没有明显差异。观察发现,SI 的变化与抑郁症状的变化之间存在适度的相关性。此外,还观察到 SI 变化、失乐症和 QOL 之间的相关性,这些相关性在控制抑郁症状变化后仍然显著。SI 的缓解似乎至少与 iTBS 的抗抑郁作用有部分关联。目前急需开展进一步的研究,探讨采用不同的iTBS治疗方案治疗自杀倾向的最佳治疗方案。试验注册 Clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT02729792 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02729792 ).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信