Is Vibration Anesthesia Effective and Safe for Pain Reduction in Botulinum Toxin Injection? A Randomized Split-Face Controlled Trial and Cadaver Experiment.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tianzhen Hua, Huan Li, Chun Liang, Guangliang Zhang, Libo Luo, Haoran Jia, Xin Liu, Yuan Chi, Yang An, Youbai Chen
{"title":"Is Vibration Anesthesia Effective and Safe for Pain Reduction in Botulinum Toxin Injection? A Randomized Split-Face Controlled Trial and Cadaver Experiment.","authors":"Tianzhen Hua, Huan Li, Chun Liang, Guangliang Zhang, Libo Luo, Haoran Jia, Xin Liu, Yuan Chi, Yang An, Youbai Chen","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is an important issue in botulinum toxin injection. Vibration anesthesia is a noninvasive way for pain alleviation, but few study reported its use during botulinum toxin injection.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether vibration anesthesia is effective and safe for pain reduction during botulinum toxin injection for masseter reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized split-face controlled trial was performed in patients who required masseter reduction. Vibration anesthesia was randomly administered on either side. Study outcomes were pain scores on a visual analog scale, duration of effect, satisfaction, and complications. Intergroup comparison and linear regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 216 patients, the pain score on the vibration side (2.97 ± 1.44) was significantly lower than that on the non-vibration side (4.72 ± 2.13) (p < 0.0001), with a higher proportion of mild pain. Linear regression showed that history of injection, more injection points and doses increased the pain, while 2 ml syringe reduced the pain compared to 1ml syringe. Side effects were found in 19 patients and 21 sides (7%), but were not associated with vibration. High satisfactions were reported. Cadaver experiment confirmed that vibration did not alter the diffusion radius and depth of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vibration anesthesia could significantly relieve the pain during botulinum toxin injection for masseter reduction, while did not affect adverse effect and effect duration. Therefore, we recommended the use of vibration anesthesia, larger syringe size, and less injection points to improve patient experience and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is an important issue in botulinum toxin injection. Vibration anesthesia is a noninvasive way for pain alleviation, but few study reported its use during botulinum toxin injection.

Objectives: To investigate whether vibration anesthesia is effective and safe for pain reduction during botulinum toxin injection for masseter reduction.

Methods: A randomized split-face controlled trial was performed in patients who required masseter reduction. Vibration anesthesia was randomly administered on either side. Study outcomes were pain scores on a visual analog scale, duration of effect, satisfaction, and complications. Intergroup comparison and linear regression analyses were performed.

Results: In a total of 216 patients, the pain score on the vibration side (2.97 ± 1.44) was significantly lower than that on the non-vibration side (4.72 ± 2.13) (p < 0.0001), with a higher proportion of mild pain. Linear regression showed that history of injection, more injection points and doses increased the pain, while 2 ml syringe reduced the pain compared to 1ml syringe. Side effects were found in 19 patients and 21 sides (7%), but were not associated with vibration. High satisfactions were reported. Cadaver experiment confirmed that vibration did not alter the diffusion radius and depth of injection.

Conclusions: Vibration anesthesia could significantly relieve the pain during botulinum toxin injection for masseter reduction, while did not affect adverse effect and effect duration. Therefore, we recommended the use of vibration anesthesia, larger syringe size, and less injection points to improve patient experience and satisfaction.

振动麻醉对减轻肉毒杆菌毒素注射疼痛有效且安全吗?随机分面对照试验和尸体实验。
背景:疼痛是肉毒毒素注射的一个重要问题。振动麻醉是一种无创的止痛方法,但很少有研究报道在肉毒毒素注射过程中使用振动麻醉:研究振动麻醉是否能有效、安全地减轻肉毒毒素注射过程中的疼痛:方法:对需要进行颌间肌缩小术的患者进行了随机分面对照试验。方法:对需要进行下颌角缩小术的患者进行了随机分面对照试验,随机在两侧进行振动麻醉。研究结果为视觉模拟量表上的疼痛评分、疗效持续时间、满意度和并发症。进行了组间比较和线性回归分析:在总共 216 名患者中,振动侧的疼痛评分(2.97 ± 1.44)明显低于非振动侧(4.72 ± 2.13)(p < 0.0001),轻度疼痛的比例更高。线性回归显示,注射史、更多注射点和剂量会增加疼痛,而 2 毫升注射器与 1 毫升注射器相比会减少疼痛。有 19 名患者和 21 个侧面(7%)出现了副作用,但与振动无关。据报告,患者的满意度很高。尸体实验证实,振动不会改变扩散半径和注射深度:结论:振动麻醉可明显缓解注射肉毒杆菌毒素缩约肌肉时的疼痛,同时不会影响不良反应和效果持续时间。因此,我们建议使用振动麻醉、更大的注射器和更少的注射点来改善患者的体验和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信