Outcomes Associated With Novel Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Cardiac Thrombus Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aiham Albaeni MD, Shuang Li PhD, Yong Shan PhD, Ravi Thakker MD, Diann E. Gaalema PhD, Ritika Saxena MPH, Yong-fang Kuo PhD, Hani Jneid MD, James Goodwin MD
{"title":"Outcomes Associated With Novel Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Cardiac Thrombus Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Aiham Albaeni MD,&nbsp;Shuang Li PhD,&nbsp;Yong Shan PhD,&nbsp;Ravi Thakker MD,&nbsp;Diann E. Gaalema PhD,&nbsp;Ritika Saxena MPH,&nbsp;Yong-fang Kuo PhD,&nbsp;Hani Jneid MD,&nbsp;James Goodwin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The treatment of cardiac thrombus after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is anticoagulation. There are conflicting data on the effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin. Using the national Medicare data, we identified patients with an admission diagnosis of STEMI and cardiac thrombus within 6 months after STEMI. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on initial type of anticoagulation medication (NOACs vs warfarin). The 2 main outcomes were ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and bleeding. Follow-up was performed through the end of 2023. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used. Of 881 patients prescribed anticoagulation after STEMI with subsequent cardiac thrombus, 496 patients were prescribed NOACs (56.3%) and 385 patients (43.7%) were prescribed warfarin. For ischemic stroke, the median follow-up time was 177 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 148 to 193) for warfarin and 266 days (95% CI 204 to 326) for NOACs. There was a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with cardiac thrombus treated with NOACs than those treated with warfarin [hazard ratio 0.73 (0.57 to 0.93)]. For bleeding, the median follow-up time was 192 days (95% CI 175 to 232) for warfarin and 277 days (95% CI 212 to 332) for NOACs. There was also a lower risk of bleeding in patients treated with NOACs than those treated with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.78, CI 0.66 to 0.92). In conclusion, patients with STEMI with cardiac thrombus had a lower risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding when treated with NOACs than when treated with warfarin. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and further examine the comparative effectiveness of different anticoagulant strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"236 ","pages":"Pages 72-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291492400794X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of cardiac thrombus after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is anticoagulation. There are conflicting data on the effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin. Using the national Medicare data, we identified patients with an admission diagnosis of STEMI and cardiac thrombus within 6 months after STEMI. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on initial type of anticoagulation medication (NOACs vs warfarin). The 2 main outcomes were ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and bleeding. Follow-up was performed through the end of 2023. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used. Of 881 patients prescribed anticoagulation after STEMI with subsequent cardiac thrombus, 496 patients were prescribed NOACs (56.3%) and 385 patients (43.7%) were prescribed warfarin. For ischemic stroke, the median follow-up time was 177 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 148 to 193) for warfarin and 266 days (95% CI 204 to 326) for NOACs. There was a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with cardiac thrombus treated with NOACs than those treated with warfarin [hazard ratio 0.73 (0.57 to 0.93)]. For bleeding, the median follow-up time was 192 days (95% CI 175 to 232) for warfarin and 277 days (95% CI 212 to 332) for NOACs. There was also a lower risk of bleeding in patients treated with NOACs than those treated with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.78, CI 0.66 to 0.92). In conclusion, patients with STEMI with cardiac thrombus had a lower risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding when treated with NOACs than when treated with warfarin. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and further examine the comparative effectiveness of different anticoagulant strategies.
STEMI 后心肌梗死血栓患者使用新型口服抗凝药和华法林的疗效。
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的心肌血栓治疗方法是抗凝。关于新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)与华法林的有效性和安全性,存在相互矛盾的数据。利用全国医疗保险数据,我们确定了入院诊断为 STEMI 且在 STEMI 后 6 个月内有心脏血栓的患者。根据初始抗凝药物类型(NOACs 与华法林)将患者分为两组。两个主要结果是缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和出血。随访至 2023 年底。采用卡普兰-梅耶(KM)曲线和 Cox 比例危险模型。在 STEMI 后继发心脏血栓的 881 位抗凝药处方患者中,496 位患者(56.3%)使用了 NOACs,385 位患者(43.7%)使用了华法林。对于缺血性卒中,华法林的中位随访时间为 177 天(95% CI:148-193),NOACs 为 266 天(95% CI:204-326)。与华法林相比,接受 NOACs 治疗的心脏血栓患者发生缺血性卒中或 TIA 的风险明显降低[HR 0.73 (0.57-0.93)]。在出血方面,华法林的中位随访时间为 192 天(95% CI:175-232),NOACs 为 277 天(95% CI:212-332)。与华法林相比,使用 NOACs 治疗的患者出血风险更低[HR 0.78(CI 0.66-0.92)]。总之,与华法林相比,有心肌血栓的 STEMI 患者接受 NOACs 治疗时发生缺血性卒中和出血的风险较低。需要进行前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现,并进一步研究不同抗凝策略的比较效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信