Standing balance test for fall prediction in older adults: a 6-month longitudinal study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Daniela Cristina Carvalho de Abreu, Anne Caroline Lima Bandeira, Paola Errera Magnani, Douglas Augusto de Oliveira Grigoletto, José Roberto de Faria Junior, Vitor Roberto Sanchez Teixeira, Victoria Message Fuentes, Roberta de Matos Brunelli Braghin
{"title":"Standing balance test for fall prediction in older adults: a 6-month longitudinal study.","authors":"Daniela Cristina Carvalho de Abreu, Anne Caroline Lima Bandeira, Paola Errera Magnani, Douglas Augusto de Oliveira Grigoletto, José Roberto de Faria Junior, Vitor Roberto Sanchez Teixeira, Victoria Message Fuentes, Roberta de Matos Brunelli Braghin","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05380-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A core component of older adult health care assessment includes identifying fall risk, which also includes identifying those with subtle balance deficits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare body displacement of the Center of Pressure (CoP) and time held during the balance test. Also, to examine whether balance tests at baseline can predict falls after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study with 153 community-dwelling older adults, between 60-89 years old. Anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) amplitude and velocity CoP displacements were assessed in four upright positions using a force platform: double-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and single-leg stances, with a maximum duration of 30 s each. Adjusted repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare the differences among the balance positions. Comparisons between males and females were also conducted. Logistic regression adjusted for confounders was performed to verify whether upright balance tests can predict future falls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the base of support narrows, body sway increases. A decrease in stance time was observed across the balance stages, i.e., double-leg/semi-tandem versus tandem versus single-leg stances. The mean duration held in the single-leg stance was 14.8 s and for tandem was 22.2 s. Similar stance durations were observed for double-leg and semi-tandem stances. Males were able to maintain balance positions longer than females even with greater CoP displacement. ML amplitude of CoP displacement and the time held during tandem and single-leg positions were able to predict falls after 6 months (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical practice in which only stance time is recorded, it is possible to interchangeably use the double-leg or semi-tandem stance. To identify early signs of imbalance, we suggest setting a time limit for the balance test equal to or greater than 23 s, as 10 s appear to be insufficient to detect subtle balance deficits. The time maintenance on tandem and single-leg positions was able to predict future falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05380-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A core component of older adult health care assessment includes identifying fall risk, which also includes identifying those with subtle balance deficits.

Objective: To compare body displacement of the Center of Pressure (CoP) and time held during the balance test. Also, to examine whether balance tests at baseline can predict falls after 6 months.

Methods: A longitudinal study with 153 community-dwelling older adults, between 60-89 years old. Anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) amplitude and velocity CoP displacements were assessed in four upright positions using a force platform: double-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and single-leg stances, with a maximum duration of 30 s each. Adjusted repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare the differences among the balance positions. Comparisons between males and females were also conducted. Logistic regression adjusted for confounders was performed to verify whether upright balance tests can predict future falls.

Results: As the base of support narrows, body sway increases. A decrease in stance time was observed across the balance stages, i.e., double-leg/semi-tandem versus tandem versus single-leg stances. The mean duration held in the single-leg stance was 14.8 s and for tandem was 22.2 s. Similar stance durations were observed for double-leg and semi-tandem stances. Males were able to maintain balance positions longer than females even with greater CoP displacement. ML amplitude of CoP displacement and the time held during tandem and single-leg positions were able to predict falls after 6 months (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In clinical practice in which only stance time is recorded, it is possible to interchangeably use the double-leg or semi-tandem stance. To identify early signs of imbalance, we suggest setting a time limit for the balance test equal to or greater than 23 s, as 10 s appear to be insufficient to detect subtle balance deficits. The time maintenance on tandem and single-leg positions was able to predict future falls.

预测老年人跌倒的站立平衡测试:一项为期 6 个月的纵向研究。
背景:老年人健康护理评估的核心内容包括识别跌倒风险,其中也包括识别那些存在微妙平衡障碍的老年人:老年人医疗保健评估的核心内容之一是识别跌倒风险,其中也包括识别那些存在细微平衡缺陷的人:目的:比较压力中心(CoP)的身体位移和平衡测试中的保持时间。同时,研究基线平衡测试能否预测 6 个月后的跌倒情况:方法:对 153 名 60-89 岁的社区老年人进行纵向研究。在四种直立姿势下,使用测力平台评估前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)CoP位移的幅度和速度:双腿、半串联、串联和单腿站立,每种姿势的最长持续时间为30秒。调整后的重复测量方差分析用于比较不同平衡姿势之间的差异。此外,还对男性和女性进行了比较。为验证直立平衡测试能否预测未来的跌倒,还对混杂因素进行了逻辑回归调整:结果:随着支撑基点的缩小,身体摇摆增加。在各平衡阶段,即双腿/半串联与串联与单腿站立阶段,观察到站立时间减少。单腿站立的平均持续时间为 14.8 秒,双腿站立的平均持续时间为 22.2 秒。即使CoP位移较大,男性保持平衡姿势的时间也比女性长。CoP位移的ML幅度以及双腿和单腿姿势时的保持时间能够预测6个月后的跌倒情况(P 结论:在临床实践中,仅用站立时间来预测跌倒情况是不准确的:在只记录站立时间的临床实践中,可以交替使用双腿站立或半双腿站立。为了识别失衡的早期迹象,我们建议将平衡测试的时间限制设定为等于或大于 23 秒,因为 10 秒似乎不足以发现细微的平衡缺陷。双腿和单腿姿势的时间维持能够预测未来的跌倒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信