Misdiagnosis in breast imaging: a statement paper from European Society Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)-Part 2: Main causes of errors in breast imaging and recommendations from European Society of Breast Imaging to limit misdiagnosis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Alexandra Athanasiou, Fleur Kilburn-Toppin, Gabor Forrai, Miruna Ispas, Mihai Lesaru, Elisabetta Giannotti, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Chantal Van Ongeval, Ritse M Mann, Fiona Gilbert, Federica Pediconi
{"title":"Misdiagnosis in breast imaging: a statement paper from European Society Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)-Part 2: Main causes of errors in breast imaging and recommendations from European Society of Breast Imaging to limit misdiagnosis.","authors":"Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Alexandra Athanasiou, Fleur Kilburn-Toppin, Gabor Forrai, Miruna Ispas, Mihai Lesaru, Elisabetta Giannotti, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Chantal Van Ongeval, Ritse M Mann, Fiona Gilbert, Federica Pediconi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11133-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of negligence claims in radiology. The objective of this document is to describe the specific main causes of errors in breast imaging and provide European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) recommendations to try to minimize these.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Technical failures represent 17% of all mammographic diagnostic negligence claims. Mammography quality control protocol and dedicated training for technologists and radiologists are essential. Lack of consideration of the clinical context is a second critical issue, as a clinical abnormality is found in 80% of malpractice claims. EUSOBI emphasizes the importance of communication and clinical examination before the diagnostic investigation. Detection errors or misapplications of the lexicon or Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) score account for 5% of malpractice claims and should be reduced by limiting radiologists' distraction or fatigue, and being aware of satisfaction of search errors and the importance of a personal systematic review. Errors related to pathological concordance and MDT review can be limited by the use of markers after biopsy and the use of standardized reports, which can aid communication with other specialities. Finally, errors related to tumor or patient factors should be discussed, considering the use of contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several factors are responsible for misdiagnosis in breast cancer, including errors in the practice of the technician and/or radiologist (technical failures, lack of consideration of the clinical context, incorrect application of the BI-RADS score, false reassurances), lack of communication with other specialists or with the patient, and the type of tumor and breast parenchyma.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question What factors most contribute to and what implications stem from misdiagnosis in breast imaging? Findings Ongoing training and education for radiologists and other healthcare providers, as well as interdisciplinary collaboration and communication is paramount. Clinical relevance Misdiagnosis in breast imaging can have significant implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the entire healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11133-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of negligence claims in radiology. The objective of this document is to describe the specific main causes of errors in breast imaging and provide European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) recommendations to try to minimize these.

Observations: Technical failures represent 17% of all mammographic diagnostic negligence claims. Mammography quality control protocol and dedicated training for technologists and radiologists are essential. Lack of consideration of the clinical context is a second critical issue, as a clinical abnormality is found in 80% of malpractice claims. EUSOBI emphasizes the importance of communication and clinical examination before the diagnostic investigation. Detection errors or misapplications of the lexicon or Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) score account for 5% of malpractice claims and should be reduced by limiting radiologists' distraction or fatigue, and being aware of satisfaction of search errors and the importance of a personal systematic review. Errors related to pathological concordance and MDT review can be limited by the use of markers after biopsy and the use of standardized reports, which can aid communication with other specialities. Finally, errors related to tumor or patient factors should be discussed, considering the use of contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusion: Several factors are responsible for misdiagnosis in breast cancer, including errors in the practice of the technician and/or radiologist (technical failures, lack of consideration of the clinical context, incorrect application of the BI-RADS score, false reassurances), lack of communication with other specialists or with the patient, and the type of tumor and breast parenchyma.

Key points: Question What factors most contribute to and what implications stem from misdiagnosis in breast imaging? Findings Ongoing training and education for radiologists and other healthcare providers, as well as interdisciplinary collaboration and communication is paramount. Clinical relevance Misdiagnosis in breast imaging can have significant implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the entire healthcare system.

乳腺成像误诊:欧洲乳腺成像学会(EUSOBI)声明文件--第 2 部分:乳腺成像误诊的主要原因和欧洲乳腺成像学会限制误诊的建议。
重要性:乳腺癌是放射科过失索赔的主要原因之一。本文件旨在描述乳腺成像错误的具体主要原因,并提供欧洲乳腺成像学会(EUSOBI)的建议,以尽量减少这些错误:技术故障占所有乳腺造影诊断过失索赔的 17%。乳腺造影质量控制协议以及对技术人员和放射医师的专门培训至关重要。缺乏对临床背景的考虑是第二个关键问题,因为在80%的过失索赔中都发现了临床异常。EUSOBI 强调在诊断检查之前进行沟通和临床检查的重要性。检测错误或对词典或乳腺成像报告数据系统(BI-RADS)评分的错误应用占医疗事故索赔的5%,应通过限制放射医师的注意力分散或疲劳、意识到搜索错误的满意度以及个人系统回顾的重要性来减少这种错误。通过在活检后使用标记物和使用有助于与其他专科沟通的标准化报告,可以限制与病理一致和多学科专家小组审查相关的错误。最后,考虑到造影剂增强乳腺摄影和磁共振成像的使用,应讨论与肿瘤或患者因素有关的误诊:导致乳腺癌误诊的因素有很多,包括技术人员和/或放射科医生的操作失误(技术故障、缺乏对临床背景的考虑、BI-RADS评分的错误应用、错误的保证)、缺乏与其他专家或患者的沟通,以及肿瘤和乳腺实质的类型:问题 造成乳腺成像误诊的主要因素和影响有哪些?研究结果 放射科医生和其他医疗服务提供者的持续培训和教育以及跨学科合作和沟通至关重要。临床意义 乳腺成像误诊会对患者、医疗服务提供者和整个医疗系统产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信