Community prevention and standardized clinical treatment jointly improve cancer outcome: Real-world evidence from an esophageal cancer patient cohort study.
Ji Ke, Fangfang Liu, Wei Yang, Ruiping Xu, Lei Chen, Wenlei Yang, Yu He, Zhen Liu, Bolin Hou, Liqun Zhang, Miaoping Lin, Lixin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fen Cai, Huawen Xu, Mengfei Liu, Ying Liu, Yaqi Pan, Zhonghu He, Yang Ke
{"title":"Community prevention and standardized clinical treatment jointly improve cancer outcome: Real-world evidence from an esophageal cancer patient cohort study.","authors":"Ji Ke, Fangfang Liu, Wei Yang, Ruiping Xu, Lei Chen, Wenlei Yang, Yu He, Zhen Liu, Bolin Hou, Liqun Zhang, Miaoping Lin, Lixin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fen Cai, Huawen Xu, Mengfei Liu, Ying Liu, Yaqi Pan, Zhonghu He, Yang Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive efforts have been put into reducing the heavy burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. However, the joint impact of prevention and treatment on the long-term overall survival (OS) of ESCC patients remains largely unknown. We consecutively recruited 13,255 ESCC patients from two Chinese centers: the Northern center, located in a high-risk area with abundant screening programs; and the Southern center, situated in a non-high-risk area with improved clinical practices. Inter-center comparison, longitudinal intra-center comparison, and a simulation analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment on OS. During a follow-up period of 12.52 years, the Northern center exhibited higher median survival than the Southern center (6.22 vs. 3.15 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Mediation analysis demonstrated that its OS advantage was largely (77.7%) attributed to earlier TNM stage (stage 0-II: 51.3% vs. 24.6%). In temporal analyses, patient survival in the Southern center gradually improved (median survival during 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 3.58 vs. 2.93 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.94), coinciding with the progress of treatment-related indices (completeness of TNM staging in discharge diagnosis [from 53.7% to 99.6%], adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy [from 0.0% to 51.1%] and right thoracic esophagectomy [from 12.4% to 86.4%], etc.). Simulation analysis further demonstrated that integrating both downstaging and high-quality treatment would lead to the best survival. Tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment have a joint impact on ESCC patient survival. Establishing a comprehensive strategy that integrates cancer prevention with optimal clinical treatment is crucial for alleviating the ESCC burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":421,"journal":{"name":"Science Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extensive efforts have been put into reducing the heavy burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. However, the joint impact of prevention and treatment on the long-term overall survival (OS) of ESCC patients remains largely unknown. We consecutively recruited 13,255 ESCC patients from two Chinese centers: the Northern center, located in a high-risk area with abundant screening programs; and the Southern center, situated in a non-high-risk area with improved clinical practices. Inter-center comparison, longitudinal intra-center comparison, and a simulation analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment on OS. During a follow-up period of 12.52 years, the Northern center exhibited higher median survival than the Southern center (6.22 vs. 3.15 years; HRadjusted = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Mediation analysis demonstrated that its OS advantage was largely (77.7%) attributed to earlier TNM stage (stage 0-II: 51.3% vs. 24.6%). In temporal analyses, patient survival in the Southern center gradually improved (median survival during 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 3.58 vs. 2.93 years; HRadjusted = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.94), coinciding with the progress of treatment-related indices (completeness of TNM staging in discharge diagnosis [from 53.7% to 99.6%], adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy [from 0.0% to 51.1%] and right thoracic esophagectomy [from 12.4% to 86.4%], etc.). Simulation analysis further demonstrated that integrating both downstaging and high-quality treatment would lead to the best survival. Tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment have a joint impact on ESCC patient survival. Establishing a comprehensive strategy that integrates cancer prevention with optimal clinical treatment is crucial for alleviating the ESCC burden.
期刊介绍:
Science Bulletin (Sci. Bull., formerly known as Chinese Science Bulletin) is a multidisciplinary academic journal supervised by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and co-sponsored by the CAS and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). Sci. Bull. is a semi-monthly international journal publishing high-caliber peer-reviewed research on a broad range of natural sciences and high-tech fields on the basis of its originality, scientific significance and whether it is of general interest. In addition, we are committed to serving the scientific community with immediate, authoritative news and valuable insights into upcoming trends around the globe.