Junjie Li , Junji Yuan , Yanhong Dong , Deyan Liu , Huijie Zheng , Weixin Ding
{"title":"Impact of wetland conversion to cropland on ecosystem carbon budget and greenhouse gas emissions in Northeast China","authors":"Junjie Li , Junji Yuan , Yanhong Dong , Deyan Liu , Huijie Zheng , Weixin Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands provide a huge carbon (C) sink and represent strategic areas for regulating climate change. However, extensive wetlands have been lost since 1700, primarily for conversion to cropland. Currently, few studies have comprehensively evaluated changes in C budgets and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions following wetland conversion to cropland. Here, we measured annual carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions from a <em>Phragmites australis</em>-dominated wetland and adjacent wetland-converted soybean cropland by combining eddy covariance and chamber methods. We included biomass removal from cropland in the full C and GHG accounting. Annually, the <em>P. australis</em> wetland was a substantial atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> source (50 ± 1 g CH<sub>4</sub> m<sup>‒2</sup>) but strong CO<sub>2</sub> (‒1217 ± 162 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>‒2</sup>) and weak N<sub>2</sub>O (‒0.1 kg N<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>‒1</sup>) sinks, which collectively shaped a big C sink (‒294 ± 44 g C m<sup>‒2</sup>) and net GHG source (180 ± 164 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>‒2</sup>). Converting <em>P. australis</em> wetland to soybean cropland demolished atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O sinks, and formed net sources of CO<sub>2</sub> (140 ± 149 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>) and N<sub>2</sub>O (1.1 ± 0.2 kg N<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>‒1</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>). Meanwhile, this conversion greatly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions to 1.2 ± 0.5 g CH<sub>4</sub> m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>. Taken together, soybean cropland was a net direct atmospheric C source of 39 ± 41 g C m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>, while holding a GHG budget of 203 ± 150 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>. Further, grain and straw in cropland were removed during harvest, creating a C loss of 142 ± 18 g C m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>, and eventually increased GHG budget to 722 ± 165 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>. Consequently, the full GHG debt of wetland-cropland conversion increased by dozens of times to 542 ± 233 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>‒2</sup> yr<sup>‒1</sup>, 95.8% of which attributed to biomass removal. Overall, our study contributes to growing recognition of C loss risks of wetland conversion to cropland and highlights the importance of straw return in mitigating climate impacts during agricultural activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"360 ","pages":"Article 110311"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wetlands provide a huge carbon (C) sink and represent strategic areas for regulating climate change. However, extensive wetlands have been lost since 1700, primarily for conversion to cropland. Currently, few studies have comprehensively evaluated changes in C budgets and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions following wetland conversion to cropland. Here, we measured annual carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from a Phragmites australis-dominated wetland and adjacent wetland-converted soybean cropland by combining eddy covariance and chamber methods. We included biomass removal from cropland in the full C and GHG accounting. Annually, the P. australis wetland was a substantial atmospheric CH4 source (50 ± 1 g CH4 m‒2) but strong CO2 (‒1217 ± 162 g CO2 m‒2) and weak N2O (‒0.1 kg N2O ha‒1) sinks, which collectively shaped a big C sink (‒294 ± 44 g C m‒2) and net GHG source (180 ± 164 g CO2-eq m‒2). Converting P. australis wetland to soybean cropland demolished atmospheric CO2 and N2O sinks, and formed net sources of CO2 (140 ± 149 g CO2 m‒2 yr‒1) and N2O (1.1 ± 0.2 kg N2O ha‒1 yr‒1). Meanwhile, this conversion greatly reduced CH4 emissions to 1.2 ± 0.5 g CH4 m‒2 yr‒1. Taken together, soybean cropland was a net direct atmospheric C source of 39 ± 41 g C m‒2 yr‒1, while holding a GHG budget of 203 ± 150 g CO2-eq m‒2 yr‒1. Further, grain and straw in cropland were removed during harvest, creating a C loss of 142 ± 18 g C m‒2 yr‒1, and eventually increased GHG budget to 722 ± 165 g CO2-eq m‒2 yr‒1. Consequently, the full GHG debt of wetland-cropland conversion increased by dozens of times to 542 ± 233 g CO2-eq m‒2 yr‒1, 95.8% of which attributed to biomass removal. Overall, our study contributes to growing recognition of C loss risks of wetland conversion to cropland and highlights the importance of straw return in mitigating climate impacts during agricultural activities.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.