Concordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsies anatomopathological findings at a tertiary-level university hospital.

Julieth Alexandra Franco, Mario Miguel Barbosa, Cesar Redondo
{"title":"Concordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsies anatomopathological findings at a tertiary-level university hospital.","authors":"Julieth Alexandra Franco, Mario Miguel Barbosa, Cesar Redondo","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.7097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clinical autopsy is a fundamental diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of diseases of public health interest. However, the clinical-pathological concordance has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the concordance between clinical diagnoses and anatomopathological findings from autopsies conducted at a tertiary-level hospital institution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study where we analyzed autopsy cases performed between 2015 and 2019. The variables studied were age, gender, origin, and clinical and anatomopathological diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concordance degree was slight (κ = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.21-0.42), which coincides with internationally reported findings in healthcare institutions with a similar patient population and availability of diagnostic resources. The clinical-pathological discrepancy, as evidenced according to the Goldman et al. classification, then modified by Battle et al., was 57.3% (47/82), corresponding to major discrepancies, a value within the expected limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concordance between clinical diagnoses and anatomopathological findings in autopsies is slight, and the discrepancies are within the expected range. This study highlights the importance of improving clinical and syndromic diagnosis of public health interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":"44 4","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.7097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A clinical autopsy is a fundamental diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of diseases of public health interest. However, the clinical-pathological concordance has not been evaluated.

Objective: To determine the concordance between clinical diagnoses and anatomopathological findings from autopsies conducted at a tertiary-level hospital institution.

Materials and methods: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study where we analyzed autopsy cases performed between 2015 and 2019. The variables studied were age, gender, origin, and clinical and anatomopathological diagnoses.

Results: The concordance degree was slight (κ = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.21-0.42), which coincides with internationally reported findings in healthcare institutions with a similar patient population and availability of diagnostic resources. The clinical-pathological discrepancy, as evidenced according to the Goldman et al. classification, then modified by Battle et al., was 57.3% (47/82), corresponding to major discrepancies, a value within the expected limits.

Conclusions: The concordance between clinical diagnoses and anatomopathological findings in autopsies is slight, and the discrepancies are within the expected range. This study highlights the importance of improving clinical and syndromic diagnosis of public health interest.

一家三级甲等大学医院的临床诊断与尸检解剖病理结果之间的一致性。
导言:临床尸检是确诊关系到公共健康的疾病的基本诊断工具。然而,临床与病理的一致性尚未得到评估:目的:确定在一家三级医院进行的尸检中,临床诊断与解剖病理结果之间的一致性:这是一项描述性、观察性、横断面和回顾性研究,我们分析了 2015 年至 2019 年期间进行的尸检病例。研究变量包括年龄、性别、籍贯以及临床和解剖病理诊断:吻合度较低(κ = 0.30;95% CI:0.21-0.42),这与国际上报道的具有相似患者人群和可用诊断资源的医疗机构的研究结果相吻合。根据戈德曼等人的分类法(后经巴特尔等人修改),临床与病理之间的差异为57.3%(47/82),属于重大差异,这一数值在预期范围之内:结论:尸检中临床诊断与解剖病理结果之间的一致性很低,差异在预期范围内。这项研究强调了改进临床诊断和涉及公共卫生利益的综合征诊断的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信