Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision for treating benign breast lesions

Cancer Innovation Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1002/cai2.158
Xuanni Tan, Juncheng Xuhong, Xiang Ai, Qin Niu, Jing Liu, Yi Zhang, Xiaowei Qi, Jun Jiang
{"title":"Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision for treating benign breast lesions","authors":"Xuanni Tan,&nbsp;Juncheng Xuhong,&nbsp;Xiang Ai,&nbsp;Qin Niu,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaowei Qi,&nbsp;Jun Jiang","doi":"10.1002/cai2.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound‑guided vacuum-assisted excision (UGVAE) and breast biopsy are widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of both benign and suspicious breast lesions. In this retrospective study, we aimed to determine the safety of UGVAE for benign breast lesions and provide guidance for clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed clinical and pathological data of female patients who had undergone UGVAE between January 2015 and December 2017 at our institution. All breast lesions were categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) before performing UGVAE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In our study cohort, UGVAE was used to resect 10,378 breast lesions from 5789 patients, and selected clinical and histopathological data were analyzed. The most common adverse events were postoperative bleeding (0.24%) and skin hypersensitivity (0.67%). The residual lesion rate was 2.27%. Fibroadenomas accounted for most of the benign lesions (7932 of 10,193; 77.82%). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 150 lesions from 128 patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.034, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.668–2.480, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), higher BI-RADS category (OR = 9.514, 95% CI: 6.790–13.332, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and larger legion size (OR = 1.048, 95% CI: 1.019–1.077, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of breast cancer. Ninety-six patients with breast cancer had undergone follow-up treatment, achieving a 3-year disease-free survival rate of 97.2% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 100%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>UGVAE is a safe and effective means of removing benign breast lesions, causing minimal postoperative trauma and fewer complications compared with open surgery. Moreover, UGVAE had little impact on the follow-up treatment and survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100212,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Innovation","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ultrasound‑guided vacuum-assisted excision (UGVAE) and breast biopsy are widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of both benign and suspicious breast lesions. In this retrospective study, we aimed to determine the safety of UGVAE for benign breast lesions and provide guidance for clinical practice.

Methods

We analyzed clinical and pathological data of female patients who had undergone UGVAE between January 2015 and December 2017 at our institution. All breast lesions were categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) before performing UGVAE.

Results

In our study cohort, UGVAE was used to resect 10,378 breast lesions from 5789 patients, and selected clinical and histopathological data were analyzed. The most common adverse events were postoperative bleeding (0.24%) and skin hypersensitivity (0.67%). The residual lesion rate was 2.27%. Fibroadenomas accounted for most of the benign lesions (7932 of 10,193; 77.82%). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 150 lesions from 128 patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.034, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.668–2.480, p < 0.001), higher BI-RADS category (OR = 9.514, 95% CI: 6.790–13.332, p < 0.001), and larger legion size (OR = 1.048, 95% CI: 1.019–1.077, p = 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of breast cancer. Ninety-six patients with breast cancer had undergone follow-up treatment, achieving a 3-year disease-free survival rate of 97.2% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 100%.

Conclusions

UGVAE is a safe and effective means of removing benign breast lesions, causing minimal postoperative trauma and fewer complications compared with open surgery. Moreover, UGVAE had little impact on the follow-up treatment and survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Abstract Image

超声引导下真空辅助切除术治疗乳腺良性病变的效果。
背景:超声引导下真空辅助切除术(UGVAE)和乳腺活检术被广泛用于乳腺良性病变和可疑病变的诊断和治疗。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在确定 UGVAE 治疗乳腺良性病变的安全性,并为临床实践提供指导:我们分析了2015年1月至2017年12月期间在我院接受UGVAE的女性患者的临床和病理数据。在进行UGVAE之前,所有乳腺病变都根据乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)进行了分类:在我们的研究队列中,UGVAE用于切除了5789名患者的10378个乳腺病灶,并对部分临床和组织病理学数据进行了分析。最常见的不良反应是术后出血(0.24%)和皮肤过敏(0.67%)。残留病灶率为 2.27%。大部分良性病变为纤维腺瘤(10193 例中有 7932 例,占 77.82%)。128 名患者的 150 个病灶被诊断为乳腺癌。多变量二元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄越大(几率比[OR] = 2.034,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.668-2.480),乳腺癌的发病率越高:1.668-2.480, p p = 0.001)与罹患乳腺癌的可能性增加有关。96名乳腺癌患者接受了后续治疗,3年无病生存率为97.2%,3年总生存率为100%:UGVAE是一种安全有效的切除乳腺良性病变的方法,与开腹手术相比,术后创伤小,并发症少。此外,UGVAE 对确诊为乳腺癌的患者的后续治疗和生存期影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信