{"title":"Real-world outcomes of everolimus-based treatment in a Taiwanese cohort with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer.","authors":"Yun-Chieh Kao, Yi-Fang Tsai, Shih-Che Shen, Ming-Shen Dai, Fang-Ming Chen, Liang-Chih Liu, Ta-Chung Chao, Chi-Cheng Huang, Ming-Feng Hou, Shin-Cheh Chen, Chun-Yu Liu, Ling-Ming Tseng","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Everolimus was the first orally targeted therapy for certain cancers. It was introduced before CDK4/6 inhibitors and is widely used to treat advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This study presents comprehensive findings including updated data and long-term survival analyses focusing on patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment. The objectives were to assess the impact of everolimus on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment line, and to evaluate its role in therapeutic strategies in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 299 women aged over 20 years with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment from multiple medical centers in Taiwan. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Adverse effects were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PFS was 5.6 months, and the median OS was 60.1 months. Patients receiving everolimus treatment in three or more lines and those who underwent chemotherapy prior to everolimus-based treatment had a significantly shorter PFS but longer OS. Patients with liver and central nervous system metastases had significantly shorter PFS and OS. The disease control rate was 51.5%, and the overall response rate was 8.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support current guidelines and advocate for the inclusion of everolimus in treatment plans for patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, particularly in late-line treatment, with careful consideration of the benefit-risk profile for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Everolimus was the first orally targeted therapy for certain cancers. It was introduced before CDK4/6 inhibitors and is widely used to treat advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This study presents comprehensive findings including updated data and long-term survival analyses focusing on patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment. The objectives were to assess the impact of everolimus on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment line, and to evaluate its role in therapeutic strategies in a real-world setting.
Methods: We included 299 women aged over 20 years with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment from multiple medical centers in Taiwan. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Adverse effects were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
Results: The median PFS was 5.6 months, and the median OS was 60.1 months. Patients receiving everolimus treatment in three or more lines and those who underwent chemotherapy prior to everolimus-based treatment had a significantly shorter PFS but longer OS. Patients with liver and central nervous system metastases had significantly shorter PFS and OS. The disease control rate was 51.5%, and the overall response rate was 8.0%.
Conclusion: These findings support current guidelines and advocate for the inclusion of everolimus in treatment plans for patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, particularly in late-line treatment, with careful consideration of the benefit-risk profile for each patient.