Evaluation of a complex intervention: the Latch On randomized controlled trial of multicomponent breastfeeding support for women with a raised body mass index.

Catherine McNestry, Anna Hobbins, Niamh Donnellan, Paddy Gillespie, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Sharleen L O'Reilly
{"title":"Evaluation of a complex intervention: the Latch On randomized controlled trial of multicomponent breastfeeding support for women with a raised body mass index.","authors":"Catherine McNestry, Anna Hobbins, Niamh Donnellan, Paddy Gillespie, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Sharleen L O'Reilly","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdae282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latch On's objective was to achieve improved breastfeeding rates in women with raised body mass indices using a multicomponent breastfeeding support intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid type 1 implementation-effectiveness trial with mixed-methods process and health economics analyses were conducted. Data collection included stakeholder questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, fidelity data, participant and health system costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was delivered with fidelity but the high breastfeeding rates at 3 months were not different between intervention and usual care. Participants receiving the minimum intervention dose were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (P = 0.045) and be breastfeeding at hospital discharge (P = 0.01) compared with participants below the threshold. Participant exit interview themes highlighted the importance of improving breastfeeding support to women, the effect of COVID-19 on the breastfeeding experience, and found that the intervention improved the experience of establishing breastfeeding. The intervention cost €157 per participant, with no other cost difference between groups. Process analysis found that follow-up breastfeeding services continued in half of sites after study completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This low-cost intervention resulted in a more enjoyable breastfeeding experience for participants and changed practice in some study sites. The intervention dose received may impact effectiveness, but further research is needed to provide definitive evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latch On's objective was to achieve improved breastfeeding rates in women with raised body mass indices using a multicomponent breastfeeding support intervention.

Methods: A hybrid type 1 implementation-effectiveness trial with mixed-methods process and health economics analyses were conducted. Data collection included stakeholder questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, fidelity data, participant and health system costs.

Results: The intervention was delivered with fidelity but the high breastfeeding rates at 3 months were not different between intervention and usual care. Participants receiving the minimum intervention dose were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (P = 0.045) and be breastfeeding at hospital discharge (P = 0.01) compared with participants below the threshold. Participant exit interview themes highlighted the importance of improving breastfeeding support to women, the effect of COVID-19 on the breastfeeding experience, and found that the intervention improved the experience of establishing breastfeeding. The intervention cost €157 per participant, with no other cost difference between groups. Process analysis found that follow-up breastfeeding services continued in half of sites after study completion.

Conclusions: This low-cost intervention resulted in a more enjoyable breastfeeding experience for participants and changed practice in some study sites. The intervention dose received may impact effectiveness, but further research is needed to provide definitive evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness.

复杂干预措施的评估:针对体重指数升高妇女的多成分母乳喂养支持的 Latch On 随机对照试验。
背景Latch On 的目标是采用多成分母乳喂养支持干预措施,提高体重指数升高妇女的母乳喂养率:方法:开展了一项混合型 1 类实施效果试验,并进行了混合方法过程和健康经济学分析。数据收集包括利益相关者问卷、访谈、焦点小组、忠实性数据、参与者和卫生系统成本:结果:干预措施实施得很忠实,但 3 个月时的高母乳喂养率在干预措施和常规护理之间并无差异。与接受最低干预剂量的参与者相比,接受最低干预剂量的参与者更有可能开始母乳喂养(P = 0.045),出院时也更有可能母乳喂养(P = 0.01)。参与者退出访谈的主题强调了改善对妇女母乳喂养支持的重要性、COVID-19 对母乳喂养体验的影响,并发现干预改善了建立母乳喂养的体验。每位参与者的干预成本为 157 欧元,组间没有其他成本差异。过程分析发现,半数研究地点在研究结束后继续提供母乳喂养后续服务:这项低成本干预为参与者带来了更愉快的母乳喂养体验,并改变了一些研究地点的做法。接受的干预剂量可能会影响效果,但还需要进一步的研究来提供临床和成本效益的确切证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信