Treatment and rehabilitation of subtalar dislocations: A case series and a review of the literature.

Elisa Troiano, Cristina Latino, Alessio Carlisi, Giovanni Battista Colasanti, Nicola Mondanelli, Stefano Giannotti
{"title":"Treatment and rehabilitation of subtalar dislocations: A case series and a review of the literature.","authors":"Elisa Troiano, Cristina Latino, Alessio Carlisi, Giovanni Battista Colasanti, Nicola Mondanelli, Stefano Giannotti","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subtalar dislocation is an uncommon orthopaedic pathology, representing 1 % of all traumatic injuries of the foot and 1-2 % of all dislocations, mostly affecting young male adults. While its urgent treatment consisting in reduction and immobilization of the dislocation has been well described, disagreement exists about post-operative management with specific regards to immobilization length and rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A case series of traumatic subtalar dislocations treated with urgent reduction, a mean of 4 weeks immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation is presented, with 1-year minimum clinical and subjective follow up. Also, a systematic review of the literature concerning the post-operative management following a subtalar dislocation, and subsequent results, has been performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-year minimum follow up, none of the patients presented with complications such as recurrence of dislocation or talus osteonecrosis. Tibio-talar and subtalar range of motion (ROM) were superimposable to the contralateral joints, with a maximum difference of 5°. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score highlighted a good functionality and a full recovery in all patients but one. Pure subtalar dislocations led to better results than complicated ones. Review of current literature available on the topic demonstrated that an earlier mobilization resulted in better ROM, but the global outcome did not differ among 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Conflicting reports are present in the literature regarding the most appropriate post-reduction management of subtalar dislocations. In our case series, successful results have been obtained with a mean of 4 weeks of limb immobilization and an early rehabilitation protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although some limitations are present, 4 weeks immobilization appears to be the best balance between a good overall outcome and a better recovery of ROM. Further studies are needed to deepen the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Subtalar dislocation is an uncommon orthopaedic pathology, representing 1 % of all traumatic injuries of the foot and 1-2 % of all dislocations, mostly affecting young male adults. While its urgent treatment consisting in reduction and immobilization of the dislocation has been well described, disagreement exists about post-operative management with specific regards to immobilization length and rehabilitation protocols.

Materials and method: A case series of traumatic subtalar dislocations treated with urgent reduction, a mean of 4 weeks immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation is presented, with 1-year minimum clinical and subjective follow up. Also, a systematic review of the literature concerning the post-operative management following a subtalar dislocation, and subsequent results, has been performed.

Results: At 1-year minimum follow up, none of the patients presented with complications such as recurrence of dislocation or talus osteonecrosis. Tibio-talar and subtalar range of motion (ROM) were superimposable to the contralateral joints, with a maximum difference of 5°. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score highlighted a good functionality and a full recovery in all patients but one. Pure subtalar dislocations led to better results than complicated ones. Review of current literature available on the topic demonstrated that an earlier mobilization resulted in better ROM, but the global outcome did not differ among 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization.

Discussion: Conflicting reports are present in the literature regarding the most appropriate post-reduction management of subtalar dislocations. In our case series, successful results have been obtained with a mean of 4 weeks of limb immobilization and an early rehabilitation protocol.

Conclusions: Although some limitations are present, 4 weeks immobilization appears to be the best balance between a good overall outcome and a better recovery of ROM. Further studies are needed to deepen the subject.

膝关节脱位的治疗和康复:系列病例和文献综述。
简介踝关节脱位是一种不常见的骨科病症,占足部所有外伤的 1%,占所有脱位的 1-2%,多发于青壮年男性。虽然对脱位的紧急治疗包括复位和固定已经有了很好的描述,但对术后管理,特别是固定时间的长短和康复方案还存在分歧:本文介绍了一系列创伤性踝关节脱位病例,这些病例均接受了紧急复位、平均 4 周的固定和后续康复治疗,并接受了至少 1 年的临床和主观随访。此外,还对有关踝关节脱位术后处理及后续结果的文献进行了系统回顾:结果:在至少一年的随访中,没有一名患者出现脱位复发或距骨骨坏死等并发症。胫骨-跗骨和跗骨下关节的活动范围(ROM)与对侧关节相同,最大相差5°。美国骨科足踝协会的踝-后足评分显示,除一名患者外,其他所有患者均功能良好,完全康复。单纯的距下脱位比复杂的脱位效果更好。对现有相关文献的回顾表明,早期活动可获得更好的ROM,但4至6周固定的总体结果并无差异:讨论:关于最合适的跖骨下脱位还原后处理方法,文献中存在相互矛盾的报道。在我们的病例系列中,平均 4 周的肢体固定和早期康复方案取得了成功的结果:尽管存在一些局限性,但 4 周的固定似乎是在良好的整体效果和更好的 ROM 恢复之间取得平衡的最佳方法。还需要进一步的研究来深化这一主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信