QTc interval prolongation impact on in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndromes patients using artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Abstract

Background: Prediction of mortality in hospitalized patients is a crucial and important problem. Several severity scoring systems over the past few decades and machine learning models for mortality prediction have been developed to predict in-hospital mortality. Our aim in this study was to apply machine learning (ML) algorithms using QTc interval to predict in-hospital mortality in ACS patients and compare them to the validated conventional risk scores.

Results: This study was retrospective, using supervised learning, and data mining. Out of a cohort of 500 patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from September 2018 to August 2020, who presented with ACS. Prediction models for in-hospital mortality in ACS patients were developed using 3 ML algorithms. We employed the ensemble learning random forest (RF) model, the Naive Bayes (NB) model and the rule-based projective adaptive resonance theory (PART) model. These models were compared to one another and to two conventional validated risk scores; the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score. Out of the 500 patients included in our study, 164 (32.8%) patients presented with unstable angina, 148 (29.6%) patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 188 (37.6%) patients were having ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 64 (12.8%) patients died in-hospital and the rest survived. Performance of prediction models was measured in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.83 to 0.93 using all available variables compared to the GRACE score (0.9 SD 0.05) and the TIMI score (0.75 SD 0.02). Using QTc as a stand-alone variable yielded (0.67 SD 0.02) with a cutoff value 450 using Bazett's formula, whereas using QTc in addition to other variables of personal and clinical data and other ECG variables, the result was 0.8 SD 0.04. Results of RF and NB models were almost the same, but PART model yielded the least results. There was no significant difference of AUC values after replacing the missing values and applying class balancer.

Conclusions: The proposed method can effectively predict patients at high risk of in-hospital mortality early in the setting of ACS using only clinical and ECG data. Prolonged QTc interval can be used as a risk predictor of in-hospital mortality in ACS patients.