Evaluation of positioning accuracy in head-and-neck cancer treatment: A cone beam computed tomography assessment of three immobilization devices with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Journal of biological methods Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14440/jbm.2024.0047
Noor Mail, Khalid M Alshamrani, Rab Nawaz Lodhi, Eman Khawandanh, Amani Saleem, Batoor Khan, Majed Alghamdi, Mohammed Nadershah, Majid S Althaqafy, Ahmed Subahi, Suliman M Alghamdi
{"title":"Evaluation of positioning accuracy in head-and-neck cancer treatment: A cone beam computed tomography assessment of three immobilization devices with volumetric modulated arc therapy.","authors":"Noor Mail, Khalid M Alshamrani, Rab Nawaz Lodhi, Eman Khawandanh, Amani Saleem, Batoor Khan, Majed Alghamdi, Mohammed Nadershah, Majid S Althaqafy, Ahmed Subahi, Suliman M Alghamdi","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2024.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we assessed the precision and repeatability of the daily patient positioning for three distinct immobilization devices used for head-and-neck patients undergoing RapidArc radiation therapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An analysis was conducted on the accuracy of patient setup for three distinct immobilization devices, resulting in 1204 CBCT images for 189 patients in total. Using a typical posifix supine headrest and five fixation point podcast-plus-thermoplastic masks, the first group of 39 patients (125 CBCTs) was immobilized. The identical method was used to immobilize the second group of 19 patients (158 CBCTs) in the same posture (supine), and AccuFormTM custom headrests were employed as an added measure. Over 65% of the patients in the third group had a double shell positioning system (DSPS) covering their entire head and neck. Patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions from CT-CBCT fusions were recorded from ARIA. Our results showed that in 90% of the anteriorposterior (AP), 90% of the superior-inferior (SI), and 92.7% of the right-left (RL) population in the first group, patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts were within 2 mm. For 99.4% (AP), 100% (SI), and 98.7% (RL) of the second group's total population, patient-alignment-accuracy was within 2 mm. In the third group, it was within 2 mm for 92.1% (AP), ~89% (SI), and 93.3% (RL) of the total population. In conclusion, a significant improvement was seen with the application of a mouth bite and a tailored backrest cushion to the five fixation point posicast mask. In addition, significant improvement in the alignment of the lower neck area was observed with the use of DSPS. Virtually 100% of the head-and-neck patients were aligned within an accuracy of 3 mm, which is the PTV margin in our department.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"11 3","pages":"e99010025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the precision and repeatability of the daily patient positioning for three distinct immobilization devices used for head-and-neck patients undergoing RapidArc radiation therapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An analysis was conducted on the accuracy of patient setup for three distinct immobilization devices, resulting in 1204 CBCT images for 189 patients in total. Using a typical posifix supine headrest and five fixation point podcast-plus-thermoplastic masks, the first group of 39 patients (125 CBCTs) was immobilized. The identical method was used to immobilize the second group of 19 patients (158 CBCTs) in the same posture (supine), and AccuFormTM custom headrests were employed as an added measure. Over 65% of the patients in the third group had a double shell positioning system (DSPS) covering their entire head and neck. Patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions from CT-CBCT fusions were recorded from ARIA. Our results showed that in 90% of the anteriorposterior (AP), 90% of the superior-inferior (SI), and 92.7% of the right-left (RL) population in the first group, patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts were within 2 mm. For 99.4% (AP), 100% (SI), and 98.7% (RL) of the second group's total population, patient-alignment-accuracy was within 2 mm. In the third group, it was within 2 mm for 92.1% (AP), ~89% (SI), and 93.3% (RL) of the total population. In conclusion, a significant improvement was seen with the application of a mouth bite and a tailored backrest cushion to the five fixation point posicast mask. In addition, significant improvement in the alignment of the lower neck area was observed with the use of DSPS. Virtually 100% of the head-and-neck patients were aligned within an accuracy of 3 mm, which is the PTV margin in our department.

评估头颈癌治疗的定位精度:锥形束计算机断层扫描对三种固定装置与容积调制弧治疗的评估。
在这项研究中,我们使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估了接受 RapidArc 放射治疗的头颈部患者使用三种不同固定装置进行日常患者定位的精确性和可重复性。我们对三种不同固定装置的患者定位准确性进行了分析,共为 189 名患者拍摄了 1204 张 CBCT 图像。使用典型的 posifix 仰卧头枕和五个固定点 podcast 加热塑面罩,对第一组 39 名患者(125 张 CBCT)进行了固定。第二组的 19 名患者(158 个 CBCT)也采用了相同的方法,以同样的姿势(仰卧)进行固定,并使用 AccuFormTM 定制头枕作为额外措施。第三组 65% 以上的患者使用了覆盖整个头颈部的双壳定位系统 (DSPS)。ARIA记录了CT-CBCT融合的垂直、纵向和横向方向上的患者对位准确度或坐垫偏移。我们的结果显示,在第一组中,90% 的前胸(AP)、90% 的上内侧(SI)和 92.7% 的右左侧(RL)人群的患者对位准确度或坐垫偏移在 2 毫米以内。第二组总人数中,99.4%(AP)、100%(SI)和 98.7%(RL)的患者对位准确度在 2 毫米以内。在第三组中,92.1%(AP)、~89%(SI)和 93.3%(RL)的患者对准精度在 2 毫米以内。总之,在五个固定点的 posicast 喉罩上使用嘴咬合器和定制靠背垫后,情况有了明显改善。此外,使用 DSPS 后,下颈部的对齐情况也有明显改善。实际上,100% 的头颈部患者的对准精度都在 3 毫米以内,这是我们科室的 PTV 边距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信