Acquaintance, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study at tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1423963
Nipin Kalal, N Sabari Vel, Saroj Chaudhary, Savita Meena, Sonam Meena, Sonu Bhichar, Spraha Singh
{"title":"Acquaintance, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study at tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan.","authors":"Nipin Kalal, N Sabari Vel, Saroj Chaudhary, Savita Meena, Sonam Meena, Sonu Bhichar, Spraha Singh","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1423963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In today's era, conducting nursing research is crucial for the advancement of the nursing profession. Scientific publications in clinical research aim to improve patient care outcomes and foster a sense of importance for nurses within the healthcare team. However, clinical nurses often fall behind due to factors such as limited familiarity, attitudes toward research, and encountered barriers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications among clinical nurses at tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among the clinical nurses. The participants were assessed for their knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications through a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that 92% of the participants lacked sufficient knowledge about scientific research publications and 78.3% experienced moderate perceived barriers. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a weak positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.143, <i>p</i> = 0.007) between knowledge and attitude and a significant negative correlation (<i>r</i> = -0.143, <i>p</i> = 0.012) between knowledge and perceived barriers. However, multiple linear regression analysis showed no significant relationship among the clinical nurses in terms of knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers toward scientific research publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study on clinical nurses revealed that the majority had insufficient knowledge about scientific research, while over half had neutral attitudes toward research publications. In addition, a significant portion of the clinical nurses reported experiencing moderate perceived barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1423963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1423963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In today's era, conducting nursing research is crucial for the advancement of the nursing profession. Scientific publications in clinical research aim to improve patient care outcomes and foster a sense of importance for nurses within the healthcare team. However, clinical nurses often fall behind due to factors such as limited familiarity, attitudes toward research, and encountered barriers.

Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications among clinical nurses at tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan.

Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among the clinical nurses. The participants were assessed for their knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers regarding scientific research publications through a self-administered questionnaire.

Results: The study revealed that 92% of the participants lacked sufficient knowledge about scientific research publications and 78.3% experienced moderate perceived barriers. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a weak positive correlation (r = 0.143, p = 0.007) between knowledge and attitude and a significant negative correlation (r = -0.143, p = 0.012) between knowledge and perceived barriers. However, multiple linear regression analysis showed no significant relationship among the clinical nurses in terms of knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers toward scientific research publications.

Conclusion: This study on clinical nurses revealed that the majority had insufficient knowledge about scientific research, while over half had neutral attitudes toward research publications. In addition, a significant portion of the clinical nurses reported experiencing moderate perceived barriers.

拉贾斯坦邦西部三级医院临床护士对科研出版物的了解、态度和感知障碍:一项横断面研究。
引言在当今时代,开展护理研究对于促进护理专业的发展至关重要。临床研究方面的科学出版物旨在改善患者护理效果,并培养护士在医疗团队中的重要性。然而,临床护士往往由于对科研的熟悉程度有限、对科研的态度以及遇到的障碍等因素而落后:本研究旨在评估拉贾斯坦邦西部三级医院临床护士对科研出版物的了解程度、态度和感知障碍:在临床护士中开展了一项横断面描述性研究。方法:在临床护士中开展了一项横断面描述性研究,通过自制问卷对参与者的科研出版物知识、态度和感知障碍进行了评估:研究结果表明,92% 的参与者对科研出版物缺乏足够的了解,78.3% 的参与者存在中度认知障碍。皮尔逊相关系数表明,知识与态度之间存在微弱的正相关(r = 0.143,p = 0.007),知识与感知障碍之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.143,p = 0.012)。然而,多元线性回归分析表明,临床护士对科研出版物的知识、态度和感知障碍之间没有明显的关系:这项针对临床护士的研究表明,大多数临床护士对科学研究的认识不足,而超过半数的临床护士对科研出版物持中立态度。此外,相当一部分临床护士表示遇到了中等程度的感知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信