Inner experiences, mental health, and well-being in autistic and non-autistic adults

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1002/aur.3273
Micah O. Mazurek, Jessica Pappagianopoulos, Sophie Brunt, Rose Nevill, Michelle Menezes, Christina Burroughs, Eleonora Sadikova, Jessica V. Smith, Mya Howard
{"title":"Inner experiences, mental health, and well-being in autistic and non-autistic adults","authors":"Micah O. Mazurek,&nbsp;Jessica Pappagianopoulos,&nbsp;Sophie Brunt,&nbsp;Rose Nevill,&nbsp;Michelle Menezes,&nbsp;Christina Burroughs,&nbsp;Eleonora Sadikova,&nbsp;Jessica V. Smith,&nbsp;Mya Howard","doi":"10.1002/aur.3273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nature of autistic adults' everyday inner experiences has been largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of inner experiences and how they relate to mental health and wellness among autistic and non-autistic adults. Autistic (<i>n</i> = 303) and non-autistic (<i>n</i> = 289) adults (ages 21–82) completed online surveys assessing their anxiety, depression, happiness, life satisfaction, and inner thinking patterns, (inner speaking [i.e., verbal thinking], inner seeing [i.e., visual thinking], unsymbolized thinking, feelings, sensory awareness, self-talk). Group differences in inner thinking were examined using Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests. Correlations and multiple linear regressions examined associations between inner experiences, mental health, and well-being. Autistic adults had greater use of inner speaking and sensory awareness, compared to non-autistic adults. The most common primary mode of inner experience for both groups was inner speaking, while fewer autistic adults reported that experiencing thoughts as feelings was their primary modality. Autistic adults reported greater use of self-talk for social assessment, self-criticism, and self-management purposes, compared to non-autistic adults. Experiencing thoughts as inner speech and as feelings were associated with anxiety in both groups. Using self-talk for social assessment and self-criticism purposes was correlated with anxiety and depression in both groups, while using self-talk for self-management was associated with depression and anxiety only among autistic adults. The results suggest that autistic and non-autistic adults have similarities in overall patterns of inner thinking, yet autistic adults may be more likely to engage in self-talk as a strategy to manage challenging day-to-day experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 12","pages":"2676-2688"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of autistic adults' everyday inner experiences has been largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of inner experiences and how they relate to mental health and wellness among autistic and non-autistic adults. Autistic (n = 303) and non-autistic (n = 289) adults (ages 21–82) completed online surveys assessing their anxiety, depression, happiness, life satisfaction, and inner thinking patterns, (inner speaking [i.e., verbal thinking], inner seeing [i.e., visual thinking], unsymbolized thinking, feelings, sensory awareness, self-talk). Group differences in inner thinking were examined using Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests. Correlations and multiple linear regressions examined associations between inner experiences, mental health, and well-being. Autistic adults had greater use of inner speaking and sensory awareness, compared to non-autistic adults. The most common primary mode of inner experience for both groups was inner speaking, while fewer autistic adults reported that experiencing thoughts as feelings was their primary modality. Autistic adults reported greater use of self-talk for social assessment, self-criticism, and self-management purposes, compared to non-autistic adults. Experiencing thoughts as inner speech and as feelings were associated with anxiety in both groups. Using self-talk for social assessment and self-criticism purposes was correlated with anxiety and depression in both groups, while using self-talk for self-management was associated with depression and anxiety only among autistic adults. The results suggest that autistic and non-autistic adults have similarities in overall patterns of inner thinking, yet autistic adults may be more likely to engage in self-talk as a strategy to manage challenging day-to-day experiences.

Abstract Image

自闭症和非自闭症成人的内心体验、心理健康和幸福感。
关于自闭症成人日常内心体验的性质,大部分研究都没有涉及。本研究旨在考察自闭症和非自闭症成年人的内心体验模式及其与心理健康和幸福感的关系。自闭症成人(n = 303)和非自闭症成人(n = 289)(21-82 岁)完成了在线调查,评估了他们的焦虑、抑郁、幸福感、生活满意度和内在思维模式(内在言语[即语言思维]、内在视觉[即视觉思维]、非符号化思维、感觉、感官意识、自我对话)。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验和卡方检验对各组内在思维的差异进行了检验。相关性和多重线性回归检验了内在体验、心理健康和幸福感之间的联系。与非自闭症成人相比,自闭症成人更多地使用内心言语和感官意识。两个群体最常见的主要内心体验方式都是内心倾诉,而较少自闭症成人表示将思想体验为感觉是他们的主要方式。与非自闭症成年人相比,自闭症成年人更多地将自我对话用于社会评估、自我批评和自我管理目的。在这两个群体中,将想法视为内心言语和感受都与焦虑有关。在两个群体中,将自我对话用于社会评估和自我批评目的与焦虑和抑郁相关,而在自闭症成人中,将自我对话用于自我管理目的仅与抑郁和焦虑相关。研究结果表明,自闭症成人和非自闭症成人在内心思考的总体模式上有相似之处,但自闭症成人可能更倾向于将自我对话作为一种策略来管理具有挑战性的日常经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信