Fractures around the knee in elderly patients: Balancing fixation and arthroplasty approaches, a multicenter experience.

Fabrizio Quattrini, Luca Andriollo, Corrado Ciatti, Pietro Maniscalco, Francesco Benazzo, Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
{"title":"Fractures around the knee in elderly patients: Balancing fixation and arthroplasty approaches, a multicenter experience.<sup />","authors":"Fabrizio Quattrini, Luca Andriollo, Corrado Ciatti, Pietro Maniscalco, Francesco Benazzo, Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, a discernible shift has occurred in the approach to knee pathologies, specifically in the management of acute fractures. Traditionally, fractures were primarily treated through osteosynthesis, whereas prosthesis replacement was primarily reserved for degenerative issues. Outcomes of this investigation aim to elucidate the potential indications and contraindications for the use of prosthetic interventions in the management of such fractures and to propose a scoring system that can be adopted for the choice between the two different approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients treated for periarticular knee fractures, with a focus on elderly patients. Patients aged older than 65 years treated in three Italian centers were recruited. Inclusion criteria comprised fractures around the knee, including distal femur types 33-A, 33-B, and 33-C, and proximal tibia types 41-A, 41-B, and 41-C, in accordance with the AO/OTA classification. Surgical treatment with osteosynthesis or arthroplasty was required and investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 2017 and October 2022, 91 patients with periarticular knee fractures underwent surgical treatment, 23.1 % males and 76.9 % females, with 78 % undergoing osteosynthesis and 22 % acute total knee replacement. Distal femoral fractures constituted 37.4 %, while 62.6 % were proximal tibial fractures. Average age at surgery was 76.4 years. Patient outcomes were assessed using PROMs, revealing generally positive results, including survivorship of 95 % at the final follow-up for both groups using the Kaplan Meier survival estimate. The study introduces a novel Total Knee Replacement Indication Scoring System (TKRISS) based on the AO Classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nowadays osteosynthesis remains the main treatment for fractures around the knee. In a geriatric patient's population and in carefully selected patients replacement can be a valid option for early weight bearing and quicker recovery comparing to fixation. The Total Knee Replacement Indication Scoring System provides a useful tool for healthcare to assess the potential indication for TKR in the context of knee fractures. It integrates a range of relevant factors, acknowledging the complex nature of patient care. Further clinical research and validation are essential to refine and optimize this scoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, a discernible shift has occurred in the approach to knee pathologies, specifically in the management of acute fractures. Traditionally, fractures were primarily treated through osteosynthesis, whereas prosthesis replacement was primarily reserved for degenerative issues. Outcomes of this investigation aim to elucidate the potential indications and contraindications for the use of prosthetic interventions in the management of such fractures and to propose a scoring system that can be adopted for the choice between the two different approaches.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients treated for periarticular knee fractures, with a focus on elderly patients. Patients aged older than 65 years treated in three Italian centers were recruited. Inclusion criteria comprised fractures around the knee, including distal femur types 33-A, 33-B, and 33-C, and proximal tibia types 41-A, 41-B, and 41-C, in accordance with the AO/OTA classification. Surgical treatment with osteosynthesis or arthroplasty was required and investigated.

Results: Between August 2017 and October 2022, 91 patients with periarticular knee fractures underwent surgical treatment, 23.1 % males and 76.9 % females, with 78 % undergoing osteosynthesis and 22 % acute total knee replacement. Distal femoral fractures constituted 37.4 %, while 62.6 % were proximal tibial fractures. Average age at surgery was 76.4 years. Patient outcomes were assessed using PROMs, revealing generally positive results, including survivorship of 95 % at the final follow-up for both groups using the Kaplan Meier survival estimate. The study introduces a novel Total Knee Replacement Indication Scoring System (TKRISS) based on the AO Classification.

Conclusions: Nowadays osteosynthesis remains the main treatment for fractures around the knee. In a geriatric patient's population and in carefully selected patients replacement can be a valid option for early weight bearing and quicker recovery comparing to fixation. The Total Knee Replacement Indication Scoring System provides a useful tool for healthcare to assess the potential indication for TKR in the context of knee fractures. It integrates a range of relevant factors, acknowledging the complex nature of patient care. Further clinical research and validation are essential to refine and optimize this scoring system.

老年膝关节周围骨折:平衡固定和关节成形术方法,多中心经验。
导言:近年来,膝关节病变的治疗方法发生了明显的变化,特别是在急性骨折的治疗方面。传统上,骨折主要通过骨合成术治疗,而假体置换则主要用于退行性问题。本研究旨在阐明在治疗此类骨折时使用假体介入治疗的潜在适应症和禁忌症,并提出一套评分系统,用于在两种不同方法之间做出选择:对接受膝关节周围骨折治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究,重点关注老年患者。研究招募了在意大利三个中心接受治疗的 65 岁以上患者。纳入标准包括膝关节周围骨折,根据 AO/OTA 分类,包括股骨远端 33-A、33-B 和 33-C 型,以及胫骨近端 41-A、41-B 和 41-C 型。需要进行骨合成或关节成形术的手术治疗,并对结果进行了调查:2017年8月至2022年10月期间,91名膝关节周围骨折患者接受了手术治疗,其中男性占23.1%,女性占76.9%,78%的患者接受了骨合成术,22%的患者接受了急性全膝关节置换术。股骨远端骨折占 37.4%,胫骨近端骨折占 62.6%。手术平均年龄为76.4岁。使用PROM对患者的治疗效果进行了评估,结果显示总体良好,包括使用卡普兰-梅耶尔存活率估计法,两组患者在最后随访时的存活率均为95%。该研究介绍了一种基于AO分类的新型全膝关节置换术适应症评分系统(TKRISS):结论:目前,骨合成术仍是治疗膝关节周围骨折的主要方法。在老年病人群体中,与固定相比,经过仔细挑选的置换是一种早期负重和更快康复的有效选择。全膝关节置换术适应症评分系统为医护人员提供了一个有用的工具,用于评估膝关节骨折情况下全膝关节置换术的潜在适应症。它综合了一系列相关因素,承认了患者护理的复杂性。进一步的临床研究和验证对于完善和优化该评分系统至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信