Health of the Pandemic Dementia Paid Staff and Unpaid Caregiver Workforce in Congregate Care and Community Settings.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Karen Donelan, Michael Vetter, Esteban Barreto, Sarah M Bannon, Inga Antonsdottir, Quincy Samus, Christine S Ritchie, Marc E Agronin, Brent P Forester, Paul B Rosenberg
{"title":"Health of the Pandemic Dementia Paid Staff and Unpaid Caregiver Workforce in Congregate Care and Community Settings.","authors":"Karen Donelan, Michael Vetter, Esteban Barreto, Sarah M Bannon, Inga Antonsdottir, Quincy Samus, Christine S Ritchie, Marc E Agronin, Brent P Forester, Paul B Rosenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the health, well-being, and access to services of paid staff and unpaid caregivers of persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Questionnaires were developed to capture the experiences of paid staff and unpaid caregivers throughout the pandemic, leveraging a pre-existing clinical trial collaborative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community and long-term care locations in Miami, Florida, Boston, Massachusetts, and the greater Baltimore, Maryland, and D.C. areas.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Paid staff from Miami Jewish and Benchmark who worked with patients with dementia during the first two years of the pandemic. Unpaid caregivers who lived within the catchment area of the study sites and provided care for community-based persons with dementia.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Measures included the Coronavirus Impact Scale, the Herth Hope Index, NPI-Q, the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, PHQ-8, items about workplace changes, caregiving relationship, and changes to caregiver support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paid staff were statistically more likely to have been exposed to, tested for, hospitalized, or seriously ill with COVID-19 and indicated moderate to severe impacts to medical and mental health services compared to unpaid caregivers. Unpaid caregivers exhibited significantly higher rates of depressive symptom severity and overall lower scores on the Herth Hope Scale compared to paid staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the pandemic had significant impacts on the mental health and general well-being of unpaid caregivers. While notable that paid staff suffered from increased exposure and decreased access to services, policies supporting both workforces should respond to the unique outcomes that each faced, post-pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.10.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the health, well-being, and access to services of paid staff and unpaid caregivers of persons living with dementia.

Design: Questionnaires were developed to capture the experiences of paid staff and unpaid caregivers throughout the pandemic, leveraging a pre-existing clinical trial collaborative.

Setting: Community and long-term care locations in Miami, Florida, Boston, Massachusetts, and the greater Baltimore, Maryland, and D.C. areas.

Participants: Paid staff from Miami Jewish and Benchmark who worked with patients with dementia during the first two years of the pandemic. Unpaid caregivers who lived within the catchment area of the study sites and provided care for community-based persons with dementia.

Measurements: Measures included the Coronavirus Impact Scale, the Herth Hope Index, NPI-Q, the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, PHQ-8, items about workplace changes, caregiving relationship, and changes to caregiver support.

Results: Paid staff were statistically more likely to have been exposed to, tested for, hospitalized, or seriously ill with COVID-19 and indicated moderate to severe impacts to medical and mental health services compared to unpaid caregivers. Unpaid caregivers exhibited significantly higher rates of depressive symptom severity and overall lower scores on the Herth Hope Scale compared to paid staff.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the pandemic had significant impacts on the mental health and general well-being of unpaid caregivers. While notable that paid staff suffered from increased exposure and decreased access to services, policies supporting both workforces should respond to the unique outcomes that each faced, post-pandemic.

在集中护理和社区环境中,大流行性痴呆症有偿工作人员和无偿护理人员的健康状况。
研究目的本研究旨在评估大流行对痴呆症患者的带薪员工和无薪护理人员的健康、福祉和获得服务的影响:设计:利用已有的临床试验合作项目,编制调查问卷,以了解带薪员工和无薪护理人员在整个大流行期间的经历:地点:佛罗里达州迈阿密市、马萨诸塞州波士顿市、马里兰州巴尔的摩市和华盛顿特区的社区和长期护理机构:迈阿密犹太医院和 Benchmark 医院的带薪员工,他们在大流行病发生的头两年曾与痴呆症患者共事。无偿护理人员,他们居住在研究地点的覆盖区内,为社区痴呆症患者提供护理服务:测量方法包括冠状病毒影响量表、Herth 希望指数、NPI-Q、改良护理人员压力指数、PHQ-8、工作场所变化、护理关系和护理人员支持变化等项目:据统计,与无酬照护者相比,有酬照护者更有可能接触到 COVID-19、接受 COVID-19 检测、住院治疗或身患重病,并对医疗和心理健康服务造成中度至重度影响。与带薪护理人员相比,无薪护理人员的抑郁症状严重程度明显更高,赫氏希望量表的总体得分也更低:我们的研究结果表明,大流行对无酬照护者的心理健康和总体福祉产生了重大影响。值得注意的是,有偿工作人员受到的影响更大,获得服务的机会更少,但支持这两类工作人员的政策应能应对大流行后他们各自面临的独特结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信