Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Middle-aged and Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study of 71,556 UK Biobank Participants.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kai Yu, Qingqing Yang, Junjian Wang, Baoqi Zeng
{"title":"Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Middle-aged and Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study of 71,556 UK Biobank Participants.","authors":"Kai Yu, Qingqing Yang, Junjian Wang, Baoqi Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used accelerometer data from the UK biobank. Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was classified into four categories: very-low (0-74.9 min/week), low (75-149.9 min/week), moderate (150-299.9 min/week), and high (≥300 min/week). Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Restricted cubic splines were used to evaluate dose-response associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71556 adults (mean [SD] age, 62.11 [7.83] years; 54.5% were female) were included. When stratified by MVPA, 10562 participants were in the very-low group (14.8%), 11578 were in the low group (16.2%), 20700 were in the moderate group (28.9%), and 28716 were in the high group (40.1%). Both MVPA and total physical activity showed nonlinear associations with the risk of depression and anxiety. Compared with very-low level MVPA, moderate MVPA might reduce the risk of depression (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.79) and anxiety (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). High MVPA was associated with a 30% lower risk of depression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78) and anxiety (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79). For sedentary behavior, quartile 4 (≥10.60 h/d) was associated with a 19% higher risk of depression (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35) compared to quartile 1 (<8.21 h/d).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WHO guideline of 150-300 min/week of MVPA may reduce the risk of depression by 29% and anxiety by 20% compared to less than 75 min/week. Prolonged sedentary behavior was associated with a higher risk of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.10.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with depression and anxiety.

Methods: We used accelerometer data from the UK biobank. Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was classified into four categories: very-low (0-74.9 min/week), low (75-149.9 min/week), moderate (150-299.9 min/week), and high (≥300 min/week). Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Restricted cubic splines were used to evaluate dose-response associations.

Results: A total of 71556 adults (mean [SD] age, 62.11 [7.83] years; 54.5% were female) were included. When stratified by MVPA, 10562 participants were in the very-low group (14.8%), 11578 were in the low group (16.2%), 20700 were in the moderate group (28.9%), and 28716 were in the high group (40.1%). Both MVPA and total physical activity showed nonlinear associations with the risk of depression and anxiety. Compared with very-low level MVPA, moderate MVPA might reduce the risk of depression (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.79) and anxiety (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). High MVPA was associated with a 30% lower risk of depression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78) and anxiety (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79). For sedentary behavior, quartile 4 (≥10.60 h/d) was associated with a 19% higher risk of depression (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35) compared to quartile 1 (<8.21 h/d).

Conclusion: The WHO guideline of 150-300 min/week of MVPA may reduce the risk of depression by 29% and anxiety by 20% compared to less than 75 min/week. Prolonged sedentary behavior was associated with a higher risk of depression.

加速计得出的中老年人体力活动、久坐行为以及抑郁和焦虑风险:对 71556 名英国生物库参与者的前瞻性队列研究》。
目的:研究加速度计测量的体力活动和久坐行为与抑郁和焦虑之间的关系:研究加速度计测量的体力活动和久坐行为与抑郁和焦虑之间的关系:我们使用了英国生物库中的加速度计数据。中度至高强度体力活动(MVPA)时间分为四类:极低(0-74.9 分钟/周)、低(75-149.9 分钟/周)、中(150-299.9 分钟/周)和高(≥300 分钟/周)。相关性采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型进行检验。限制性三次样条用于评估剂量-反应关系:共纳入 71556 名成年人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 62.11 [7.83] 岁;54.5% 为女性)。按 MVPA 分层后,10562 人属于极低组(14.8%),11578 人属于低组(16.2%),20700 人属于中等组(28.9%),28716 人属于高组(40.1%)。MVPA 和总运动量与抑郁和焦虑的风险呈非线性关系。与极低水平的 MVPA 相比,中度 MVPA 可降低抑郁(HR,0.71;95% CI,0.63-0.79)和焦虑(HR,0.80;95% CI,0.71-0.90)的风险。高 MVPA 与抑郁(HR,0.70;95% CI,0.62-0.78)和焦虑(HR,0.70;95% CI,0.62-0.79)风险降低 30% 相关。就久坐行为而言,与四分位数 1 相比,四分位数 4(≥10.60 小时/天)的抑郁风险高出 19%(HR,1.19;95% CI,1.05-1.35)(结论:世卫组织关于 150-300 小时/天的指导原则,与四分位数 2(≥10.60 小时/天)和四分位数 3(≥10.60 小时/天)的抑郁风险相同):与每周少于 75 分钟的 MVPA 相比,世界卫生组织规定的每周 150-300 分钟的 MVPA 可将抑郁风险降低 29%,将焦虑风险降低 20%。长期久坐与抑郁风险较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信