Fourth-year student pharmacists’ perceptions of a required student-run free clinic experience

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Garrett Shepard , Amy N. Thompson , Megan Eagle , Kelly Shakoor , Caitlin Ferguson , Paul C. Walker , Sarah E. Vordenberg
{"title":"Fourth-year student pharmacists’ perceptions of a required student-run free clinic experience","authors":"Garrett Shepard ,&nbsp;Amy N. Thompson ,&nbsp;Megan Eagle ,&nbsp;Kelly Shakoor ,&nbsp;Caitlin Ferguson ,&nbsp;Paul C. Walker ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Vordenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The University of Michigan Student-Run Free Clinic (UMSRFC) provides quality preventive, acute, and chronic care free of charge to uninsured and underinsured community members. We sought to assess fourth-year student pharmacists’ (P4) attitudes toward providing care as part of a required experience at the UMSRFC during their Ambulatory Care Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All P4s in the 2023–2024 academic year completed an 8-hour experience at the UMSRFC. Preclinic and postclinic surveys were electronically administered, and items related to social determinants of health, patient-centered care, interprofessional teams, and interest in future opportunities were included. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired <em>t</em> tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 78 of 83 students (94.0%) participated in the research study. After the experience, students reported higher comfort with providing efficient, cost-effective pharmacy services, assessing patients’ health care status and needs, and advocating for and assisting patients in obtaining the resources and care they need. Students also reported a higher level of comfort collaborating as part of an interprofessional team after the experience. Most students (92.3%) recommended that the experience continue for future P4s.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A clinical experience at a student-run free clinic can allow P4s to practice multiple skills that align with the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities. After this experience, P4s felt more comfortable working with underserved populations and collaborating on interprofessional teams and reported being more likely to volunteer at a free medical clinic. We encourage pharmacy programs affiliated with a student-run free clinic to consider implementing a required clinical experience for P4 students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The University of Michigan Student-Run Free Clinic (UMSRFC) provides quality preventive, acute, and chronic care free of charge to uninsured and underinsured community members. We sought to assess fourth-year student pharmacists’ (P4) attitudes toward providing care as part of a required experience at the UMSRFC during their Ambulatory Care Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience.

Methods

All P4s in the 2023–2024 academic year completed an 8-hour experience at the UMSRFC. Preclinic and postclinic surveys were electronically administered, and items related to social determinants of health, patient-centered care, interprofessional teams, and interest in future opportunities were included. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t tests.

Results

A total of 78 of 83 students (94.0%) participated in the research study. After the experience, students reported higher comfort with providing efficient, cost-effective pharmacy services, assessing patients’ health care status and needs, and advocating for and assisting patients in obtaining the resources and care they need. Students also reported a higher level of comfort collaborating as part of an interprofessional team after the experience. Most students (92.3%) recommended that the experience continue for future P4s.

Conclusion

A clinical experience at a student-run free clinic can allow P4s to practice multiple skills that align with the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities. After this experience, P4s felt more comfortable working with underserved populations and collaborating on interprofessional teams and reported being more likely to volunteer at a free medical clinic. We encourage pharmacy programs affiliated with a student-run free clinic to consider implementing a required clinical experience for P4 students.
四年级学生药剂师对学生经营的免费诊所体验的看法。
目标:密歇根大学学生开办的免费诊所(UMSRFC)免费为无保险和保险不足的社区成员提供优质的预防、急性和慢性病护理。我们试图评估四年级学生药剂师(P4)对在非住院护理高级药学实践经验(APPE)期间在 UMSRFC 提供护理服务的态度:方法:2023-2024 学年的所有四年级药剂师都在 UMSRFC 完成了 8 小时的体验。诊所前和诊所后调查均以电子方式进行,调查项目包括健康的社会决定因素、以患者为中心的护理、跨专业团队以及对未来机会的兴趣。采用描述性统计和配对 t 检验对数据进行了分析:共有 78/83 名学生(94.0%)参与了研究。体验结束后,学生们表示在提供高效、经济的药学服务,评估患者的健康状况和需求,以及倡导和协助患者获得所需资源和护理方面更加得心应手。学生们还表示,在体验之后,作为跨专业团队的一员,他们更乐于合作。大多数学生(92.3%)建议未来的 P4 学生继续体验:在 SRFC 的临床体验可以让 P4 学生练习与课程成果和委托专业活动(COEPA)相一致的多种技能。经过这次体验后,P4 学生在与服务不足的人群打交道和在跨专业团队中合作时感到更加得心应手,并表示更有可能在免费医疗诊所担任志愿者。我们鼓励隶属于 SRFC 的药学专业考虑为 P4 学生提供必要的临床经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信