Best Practices for Interprofessional Education to Meet the Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA).

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
J M Zeeman, D Vyas, K R Ragucci
{"title":"Best Practices for Interprofessional Education to Meet the Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA).","authors":"J M Zeeman, D Vyas, K R Ragucci","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A proliferation of articles describe the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) to promote a collaborative practice workforce. As pharmacy programs implement, develop, and assess impactful IPE activities and experiences in their didactic and experiential curricula, it is important to consider various IPE frameworks and accreditation expectations. The purpose of this article is to elucidate best practices for high-quality IPE with consideration given to the recently released 2022 Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA), 2023 Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Competencies, and 2025 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Multiple factors were identified as important considerations for building and sustaining effective IPE programs, including: (1) institutional readiness, (2) institutional culture, (3) infrastructure, (4), financial considerations, (5) faculty development, (6) curricular programming, and (7) outcomes assessment. Evidence supports these factors as best practices for quality IPE and articulates how these elements can be used to mitigate challenges and/or barriers experienced in developing, implementing, and advancing IPE.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Equipping learners with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to work effectively as part of an interprofessional team is key to developing a collaborative practice-ready pharmacy workforce. The 2023 IPEC Competencies, which serve as a consensus framework to advance interprofessional education, informed the development of the interprofessional collaboration elements in the 2022 COEPA and 2025 ACPE Standards. Individual programs should leverage best practices related to institutional considerations, curricular development, and assessment to establish successful IPE programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A proliferation of articles describe the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) to promote a collaborative practice workforce. As pharmacy programs implement, develop, and assess impactful IPE activities and experiences in their didactic and experiential curricula, it is important to consider various IPE frameworks and accreditation expectations. The purpose of this article is to elucidate best practices for high-quality IPE with consideration given to the recently released 2022 Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA), 2023 Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Competencies, and 2025 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards.

Findings: Multiple factors were identified as important considerations for building and sustaining effective IPE programs, including: (1) institutional readiness, (2) institutional culture, (3) infrastructure, (4), financial considerations, (5) faculty development, (6) curricular programming, and (7) outcomes assessment. Evidence supports these factors as best practices for quality IPE and articulates how these elements can be used to mitigate challenges and/or barriers experienced in developing, implementing, and advancing IPE.

Summary: Equipping learners with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to work effectively as part of an interprofessional team is key to developing a collaborative practice-ready pharmacy workforce. The 2023 IPEC Competencies, which serve as a consensus framework to advance interprofessional education, informed the development of the interprofessional collaboration elements in the 2022 COEPA and 2025 ACPE Standards. Individual programs should leverage best practices related to institutional considerations, curricular development, and assessment to establish successful IPE programs.

跨专业教育的最佳实践,以满足课程成果和委托专业活动(COEPA)的要求。
目的:大量文章阐述了跨专业教育(IPE)对促进合作实践队伍建设的重要性。当药学课程在其教学和体验课程中实施、开发和评估有影响力的 IPE 活动和经验时,考虑各种 IPE 框架和认证期望非常重要。本文旨在阐明高质量 IPE 的最佳实践,同时考虑到最近发布的 2022 年课程成果和可委托专业活动 (COEPA)、2023 年跨专业教育合作 (IPEC) 能力以及 2025 年药学教育认证委员会 (ACPE) 标准:多种因素被认为是建立和维持有效 IPE 项目的重要考虑因素,包括:(1) 机构准备;(2) 机构文化;(3) 基础设施;(4) 财务考虑;(5) 师资发展;(6) 课程计划;(7) 成果评估。有证据支持这些因素是高质量 IPE 的最佳实践,并阐明了如何利用这些因素来减轻在开发、实施和推进 IPE 过程中遇到的挑战和/或障碍。摘要:让学习者具备作为跨专业团队的一员有效工作的知识、技能和态度,是培养一支协作性的、为实践做好准备的药学人才队伍的关键。2023 年 IPEC 能力作为推进跨专业教育的共识框架,为制定 2022 年 COEPA 和 2025 年 ACPE 标准中的跨专业协作要素提供了依据。各个项目应充分利用与机构考虑因素、课程开发和评估相关的最佳实践,以建立成功的 IPE 项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信