Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Tunisian Experience.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Hayet Zitouni, Najoua Ben Kraiem, Saloua Ammar, Mahdi Ben Dhaou, Riadh Mhiri
{"title":"Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Tunisian Experience.","authors":"Hayet Zitouni, Najoua Ben Kraiem, Saloua Ammar, Mahdi Ben Dhaou, Riadh Mhiri","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for pediatric acute appendicitis in order to guide its future management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all children under the age of 14 years, who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis, during a period of 6 years (2013-2018). We divided our patients in two groups based on the surgical modality: the laparoscopic and open group. P values of less than .05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 690 appendectomies were identified: 151 (22%) were performed laparoscopically and 539 (78%) via laparotomy. The demographic data were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no statistical difference regarding the age, sex. However the frequency of obese patients was higher in laparoscopic approach (P < .001).The mean operative time was significantly longer in the Laparoscopic group (77 ± 39, 6 minutes) compared with Open group (57 ± 27 minutes) (P < .001). Prophylactic drain placement was significantly more common in the open appendectomy group (P = .034). Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy experienced a quicker recovery to apyrexia, reduced use of postoperative analgesics, and postoperative antibiotic compared to those undergoing open appendectomy (P < .05). The mean length of hospital stay was respectively 4 ± 1 day in LA group and 4 ± 2 days in the OA group. No significant difference was observed. The results showed no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the incidence of wound infection, intra abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction and umbilical hernia (P > .05).There was no death in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and feasible for the management of appendicitis without significant influence on the complications rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":"59 6","pages":"586-590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for pediatric acute appendicitis in order to guide its future management.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all children under the age of 14 years, who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis, during a period of 6 years (2013-2018). We divided our patients in two groups based on the surgical modality: the laparoscopic and open group. P values of less than .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 690 appendectomies were identified: 151 (22%) were performed laparoscopically and 539 (78%) via laparotomy. The demographic data were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no statistical difference regarding the age, sex. However the frequency of obese patients was higher in laparoscopic approach (P < .001).The mean operative time was significantly longer in the Laparoscopic group (77 ± 39, 6 minutes) compared with Open group (57 ± 27 minutes) (P < .001). Prophylactic drain placement was significantly more common in the open appendectomy group (P = .034). Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy experienced a quicker recovery to apyrexia, reduced use of postoperative analgesics, and postoperative antibiotic compared to those undergoing open appendectomy (P < .05). The mean length of hospital stay was respectively 4 ± 1 day in LA group and 4 ± 2 days in the OA group. No significant difference was observed. The results showed no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the incidence of wound infection, intra abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction and umbilical hernia (P > .05).There was no death in this study.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and feasible for the management of appendicitis without significant influence on the complications rate.

儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术:突尼斯经验。
研究目的本研究旨在比较开腹阑尾切除术(OA)和腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的手术效果,以指导今后的治疗:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,研究对象包括 6 年内(2013-2018 年)因急性阑尾炎接受阑尾切除术的所有 14 岁以下儿童。我们根据手术方式将患者分为两组:腹腔镜组和开腹组。P值小于0.05为具有统计学意义:结果:共确定了 690 例阑尾切除术:结果:共确定了 690 例阑尾切除术:151 例(22%)通过腹腔镜进行,539 例(78%)通过开腹手术进行。两组患者的人口统计学数据相当。在年龄和性别方面没有统计学差异。腹腔镜组的平均手术时间(77 ± 39,6 分钟)明显长于开腹组(57 ± 27 分钟)(P < .001)。在开腹阑尾切除术组中,预防性引流管置入明显更常见(P = .034)。与开腹阑尾切除术相比,接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者恢复得更快,术后镇痛药和抗生素的用量也更少(P < .05)。LA组和OA组的平均住院时间分别为4±1天和4±2天。无明显差异。结果显示,两组在伤口感染、腹腔内脓肿、肠梗阻和脐疝的发生率方面无明显差异(P > .05):结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是治疗阑尾炎安全可行的方法,对并发症发生率无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信