Dorothea Geddes-Barton, Sofia Baldelli, Roshan Karthikappallil, Thomas Bentley, Blessing Omorodion, Lucy Thompson, Nia Wyn Roberts, Raph Goldacre, Marian Knight, Rema Ramakrishnan
{"title":"Association between socioeconomic disadvantage and severe maternal morbidity and mortality in high-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Dorothea Geddes-Barton, Sofia Baldelli, Roshan Karthikappallil, Thomas Bentley, Blessing Omorodion, Lucy Thompson, Nia Wyn Roberts, Raph Goldacre, Marian Knight, Rema Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic position (SEP) is among the most important determinants of variations in health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to summarise the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and maternal mortality (MM) across high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases and Google Scholar from January 2000 to June 2023. Peer-reviewed papers from observational studies conducted in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries were included. Meta-analyses of comparable studies, a narrative summary and a harvest plot were undertaken.The risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final review included 52 papers. In the meta-analyses, compared with the least amount of neighbourhood deprivation, neighbourhood income, neighbourhood poverty and years of education, the ORs for SMM in the highest group were 1.45 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.63), 1.61 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.66) and 1.29 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.37), respectively. Similarly, the ORs for MM among least versus highest amount of neighbourhood deprivation, unemployed versus employed, lower versus higher occupational group and years of education were 2.10 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.81), 1.86 (95% CI 0.95 to 3.66), 1.61 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.51) and 1.90 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.79), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In high-income countries across the different measures of SEP, socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with increased risk for SMM and MM. There is a need for interventions across multiple societal levels that will be effective in reducing these inequitable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023399267.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomic position (SEP) is among the most important determinants of variations in health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to summarise the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and maternal mortality (MM) across high-income countries.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases and Google Scholar from January 2000 to June 2023. Peer-reviewed papers from observational studies conducted in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries were included. Meta-analyses of comparable studies, a narrative summary and a harvest plot were undertaken.The risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa tool.
Results: The final review included 52 papers. In the meta-analyses, compared with the least amount of neighbourhood deprivation, neighbourhood income, neighbourhood poverty and years of education, the ORs for SMM in the highest group were 1.45 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.63), 1.61 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.66) and 1.29 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.37), respectively. Similarly, the ORs for MM among least versus highest amount of neighbourhood deprivation, unemployed versus employed, lower versus higher occupational group and years of education were 2.10 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.81), 1.86 (95% CI 0.95 to 3.66), 1.61 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.51) and 1.90 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.79), respectively.
Discussion: In high-income countries across the different measures of SEP, socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with increased risk for SMM and MM. There is a need for interventions across multiple societal levels that will be effective in reducing these inequitable outcomes.
背景:社会经济地位(SEP)是决定健康结果变化的最重要因素之一。本系统综述旨在总结高收入国家中社会经济劣势与严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)和孕产妇死亡率(MM)风险之间的关系:方法:在 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PsycInfo 数据库以及 Google Scholar 进行了全面检索。纳入了在经济合作与发展组织国家进行的观察性研究中经过同行评审的论文。采用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华工具对偏倚风险进行评估:最终审查包括 52 篇论文。在荟萃分析中,与邻里贫困程度最低、邻里收入最低、邻里贫困程度最高和受教育年限最低的人群相比,SMM的OR值分别为1.45(95% CI 1.13至1.85)、1.48(95% CI 1.34至1.63)、1.61(95% CI 0.97至2.66)和1.29(95% CI 1.22至1.37)。同樣地,在鄰里貧窮程度最低與最高、失業與就業、職業組別較低與較高,以及受教育年期方面,MM的OR分別為2.10(95% CI 1.57至2.81)、1.86(95% CI 0.95至3.66)、1.61(95% CI 1.03至2.51)及1.90(95% CI 1.29至2.79):在高收入国家,在不同的SEP衡量标准中,社会经济劣势与罹患SMM和MM的风险增加有关。有必要在多个社会层面采取干预措施,以有效减少这些不公平的结果:CRD42023399267。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.