Insights from Computational Fluid Dynamics and In Vitro Studies for Stent Protrusion in Iliac Vein: How Far Shall We Go?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhenmin Fan, Jian Lu, Hao Cheng, Xia Ye, Xiaoyan Deng, Pengfei Zhao, Junjun Liu, Mingyuan Liu
{"title":"Insights from Computational Fluid Dynamics and In Vitro Studies for Stent Protrusion in Iliac Vein: How Far Shall We Go?","authors":"Zhenmin Fan, Jian Lu, Hao Cheng, Xia Ye, Xiaoyan Deng, Pengfei Zhao, Junjun Liu, Mingyuan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13239-024-00758-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These findings provide significant implications for the enhancement of iliac vein stent implantation strategies and stent design. The prevalent use of stents for treating Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome (IVCS) has shown efficacy, yet the associated clinical adverse events, including stent restenosis and postoperative thrombosis, are significant concerns. Up to now, the mechanism how the stent implantation induces the restenosis and DVT is still unclear. Our study hypothesizes that these adverse outcomes arise from altered blood flow dynamics following stent implantation. Employing computational modeling and medical imaging, we simulated IVCS after various stenting procedures to assess their impact on venous blood flow characteristics, including wall shear stress (WSS), residence time (RRT), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). Our findings reveal that a stent protruding into the vena cava impedes blood circulation, with increased protrusion exacerbating this obstruction. This is particularly evident at the vein bifurcation, where low WSS and elevated OSI and RRT are observed. Moreover, a higher stent strut density further obstructs blood flow, deteriorating the hemodynamic environment. Consequently, stent protrusion into the vena cava can enhance the likelihood of adverse post-surgical events. These insights have profound implications for optimizing iliac vein stent implantation techniques and stent design.</p>","PeriodicalId":54322,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"79-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-024-00758-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These findings provide significant implications for the enhancement of iliac vein stent implantation strategies and stent design. The prevalent use of stents for treating Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome (IVCS) has shown efficacy, yet the associated clinical adverse events, including stent restenosis and postoperative thrombosis, are significant concerns. Up to now, the mechanism how the stent implantation induces the restenosis and DVT is still unclear. Our study hypothesizes that these adverse outcomes arise from altered blood flow dynamics following stent implantation. Employing computational modeling and medical imaging, we simulated IVCS after various stenting procedures to assess their impact on venous blood flow characteristics, including wall shear stress (WSS), residence time (RRT), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). Our findings reveal that a stent protruding into the vena cava impedes blood circulation, with increased protrusion exacerbating this obstruction. This is particularly evident at the vein bifurcation, where low WSS and elevated OSI and RRT are observed. Moreover, a higher stent strut density further obstructs blood flow, deteriorating the hemodynamic environment. Consequently, stent protrusion into the vena cava can enhance the likelihood of adverse post-surgical events. These insights have profound implications for optimizing iliac vein stent implantation techniques and stent design.

计算流体力学和体外研究对髂静脉支架突出的启示:我们还能走多远?
这些发现对改进髂静脉支架植入策略和支架设计具有重要意义。目前普遍使用支架治疗髂静脉压迫综合征(IVCS)已显示出疗效,但与之相关的临床不良事件,包括支架再狭窄和术后血栓形成,却令人十分担忧。迄今为止,支架植入如何诱发再狭窄和深静脉血栓形成的机制仍不清楚。我们的研究假设,这些不良后果源于支架植入后血流动力学的改变。通过计算建模和医学成像,我们模拟了各种支架植入术后的 IVCS,以评估其对静脉血流特征的影响,包括壁剪应力(WSS)、滞留时间(RRT)和振荡剪切指数(OSI)。我们的研究结果表明,突入腔静脉的支架会阻碍血液循环,而突入量的增加会加剧这种阻塞。这一点在静脉分叉处尤为明显,在该处可观察到较低的 WSS 以及较高的 OSI 和 RRT。此外,较高的支架支柱密度会进一步阻塞血流,恶化血液动力学环境。因此,支架突入腔静脉会增加术后发生不良事件的可能性。这些见解对优化髂静脉支架植入技术和支架设计具有深远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology is a journal publishing the spectrum of basic to translational research in all aspects of cardiovascular physiology and medical treatment. It is the forum for academic and industrial investigators to disseminate research that utilizes engineering principles and methods to advance fundamental knowledge and technological solutions related to the cardiovascular system. Manuscripts spanning from subcellular to systems level topics are invited, including but not limited to implantable medical devices, hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics, functional imaging, surgical devices, electrophysiology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, diagnostic instruments, transport and delivery of biologics, and sensors. In addition to manuscripts describing the original publication of research, manuscripts reviewing developments in these topics or their state-of-art are also invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信