Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Postoperative Radiation Therapy Planning in Patients with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Instrumentation.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jacob Ward, Mark Damante, Seth Wilson, Ahmed Nader Elguindy, Dominic Franceschelli, Vicente de Paulo Martins Coelho, Santino Cua, Daniel Kreatsoulas, Wesley Zoller, Sasha Beyer, Dukagjin Blakaj, Joshua Palmer, Raj Singh, Evan Thomas, Vikram Chakravarthy
{"title":"Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Postoperative Radiation Therapy Planning in Patients with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Instrumentation.","authors":"Jacob Ward, Mark Damante, Seth Wilson, Ahmed Nader Elguindy, Dominic Franceschelli, Vicente de Paulo Martins Coelho, Santino Cua, Daniel Kreatsoulas, Wesley Zoller, Sasha Beyer, Dukagjin Blakaj, Joshua Palmer, Raj Singh, Evan Thomas, Vikram Chakravarthy","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is being used more frequently in the spinal oncology landscape. Better visualization with this material allows for more precise postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning using either computed tomography (CT)-myelography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. We compared the dosimetric planning equivalencies and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Thirty-six consecutively treated patients were reviewed who underwent spinal fusion using CFR-PEEK instrumentation for spine metastases followed by postoperative SBRT between January 1, 2022, and April 3, 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the imaging modality, MRI versus CT-myelogram, used for postoperative SBRT planning. Surgical, demographic, postoperative radiation dosimetry, complication, and survival data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS (v29.0.1.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients underwent CT-myelograms, and 25 patients underwent MR-spine imaging for SBRT planning. The median follow-up was 145.5 days (13-530). There were no significant differences between baseline demographic, surgical characteristics, or SBRT dosimetry between the MRI spine and CT-myelogram groups. There was no significant difference between the cohorts for survival (P = .402).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MR scans are an effective choice for postoperative SBRT contouring patients using CFR-PEEK instrumentation for oncologic spinal fusions. Avoidance of CT-myelography reduces the need for an invasive procedure and potential risks including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, nerve root injury, and increased procedural burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is being used more frequently in the spinal oncology landscape. Better visualization with this material allows for more precise postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning using either computed tomography (CT)-myelography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. We compared the dosimetric planning equivalencies and outcomes.

Methods and materials: Thirty-six consecutively treated patients were reviewed who underwent spinal fusion using CFR-PEEK instrumentation for spine metastases followed by postoperative SBRT between January 1, 2022, and April 3, 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the imaging modality, MRI versus CT-myelogram, used for postoperative SBRT planning. Surgical, demographic, postoperative radiation dosimetry, complication, and survival data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS (v29.0.1.0).

Results: Eleven patients underwent CT-myelograms, and 25 patients underwent MR-spine imaging for SBRT planning. The median follow-up was 145.5 days (13-530). There were no significant differences between baseline demographic, surgical characteristics, or SBRT dosimetry between the MRI spine and CT-myelogram groups. There was no significant difference between the cohorts for survival (P = .402).

Conclusions: MR scans are an effective choice for postoperative SBRT contouring patients using CFR-PEEK instrumentation for oncologic spinal fusions. Avoidance of CT-myelography reduces the need for an invasive procedure and potential risks including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, nerve root injury, and increased procedural burden.

在使用 CFR-PEEK 器械的患者术后 RT 计划中使用 MRI。
背景和目的:碳纤维增强型 PEEK 器械在脊柱肿瘤领域的应用越来越广泛。使用这种材料可以获得更好的可视化效果,从而可以使用 CT 髓鞘造影术或核磁共振成像研究进行更精确的术后立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)规划。我们比较了剂量规划的等效性和结果:方法:我们对 306 例连续接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 4 日期间使用 CFR-PEEK 器械对脊柱转移瘤进行了脊柱融合术,术后接受了 SBRT。根据术后 SBRT 计划使用的成像模式(MRI 与 CT-髓鞘造影),患者被分为两组。收集了手术、人口统计学、术后放射剂量测定、并发症和生存数据。统计分析在 SPSS(v29.0.1.0)中进行:11名患者接受了CT-髓鞘造影,25名患者接受了磁共振脊柱成像以进行SBRT计划。中位随访时间为 145.5 天 [13-530]。MRI脊柱成像组和CT髓鞘造影组在基线人口统计学、手术特征或SBRT剂量学方面没有明显差异。两组患者的生存率无明显差异(P=0.402):结论:磁共振扫描是使用CFR-PEEK器械进行肿瘤脊柱融合术的患者术后SBRT轮廓扫描的有效选择。结论:磁共振扫描是使用CFR-PEEK器械进行肿瘤性脊柱融合术的SBRT术后轮廓扫描患者的有效选择,避免了CT脊髓造影,减少了侵入性手术的需要和潜在风险,包括CSF渗漏、神经根损伤和增加的手术负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信