Best practice guidelines for use of reference points in radiation oncology information systems to aggregate longitudinal dosimetric data.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Alon Witztum, Younes Jourani, Emily Y Hirata, Todd McNutt, Thomas G Purdie, Kristy K Brock, David S Hong, Michelle E Howard, Andra V Krauze, Peter A Balter, Abigail L Stockham, Elizabeth Covington, Ying Xiao, Richard Popple, Charles S Mayo
{"title":"Best practice guidelines for use of reference points in radiation oncology information systems to aggregate longitudinal dosimetric data.","authors":"Alon Witztum, Younes Jourani, Emily Y Hirata, Todd McNutt, Thomas G Purdie, Kristy K Brock, David S Hong, Michelle E Howard, Andra V Krauze, Peter A Balter, Abigail L Stockham, Elizabeth Covington, Ying Xiao, Richard Popple, Charles S Mayo","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Tracking patient dose in radiation oncology is challenging due to disparate electronic systems from various vendors. Treatment planning systems (TPS), radiation oncology information systems (ROIS), and electronic health records (EHR) lack uniformity, complicating dose tracking and reporting. To address this, we examined practices in multiple radiation oncology settings and proposed guidelines for current systems.</p><p><strong>Material/methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among members of various professional groups to understand dose reporting practices in TPS, ROIS, and EHR systems. The aim was to identify consistent components and develop guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six treatment scenarios where current ROIS defaults fail in accurately representing dose totals. A standardized approach involving three reference point types - Primary Treatment Plan Reference, Dose Check, and Prescription Tracking - was proposed to address these scenarios. Standardizing naming conventions for reference points was also recommended for easier integration with EHRs. The approach requires minimal modifications to existing systems and facilitates easier data transfer and display in EHRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardizing reference points in commercial TPS and ROIS can bridge infrastructure gaps and improve dose tracking in complex clinical scenarios. This standardization, aligned with AAPM's TG-263, paves the way for continual development of automated, standardized, interoperable tools, enhancing the ease of sharing reference point information.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: Tracking patient dose in radiation oncology is challenging due to disparate electronic systems from various vendors. Treatment planning systems (TPS), radiation oncology information systems (ROIS), and electronic health records (EHR) lack uniformity, complicating dose tracking and reporting. To address this, we examined practices in multiple radiation oncology settings and proposed guidelines for current systems.

Material/methods: A survey was conducted among members of various professional groups to understand dose reporting practices in TPS, ROIS, and EHR systems. The aim was to identify consistent components and develop guidelines.

Results: We identified six treatment scenarios where current ROIS defaults fail in accurately representing dose totals. A standardized approach involving three reference point types - Primary Treatment Plan Reference, Dose Check, and Prescription Tracking - was proposed to address these scenarios. Standardizing naming conventions for reference points was also recommended for easier integration with EHRs. The approach requires minimal modifications to existing systems and facilitates easier data transfer and display in EHRs.

Conclusion: Standardizing reference points in commercial TPS and ROIS can bridge infrastructure gaps and improve dose tracking in complex clinical scenarios. This standardization, aligned with AAPM's TG-263, paves the way for continual development of automated, standardized, interoperable tools, enhancing the ease of sharing reference point information.

在放射肿瘤信息系统中使用参考点汇总纵向剂量数据的最佳实践指南。
目的/目标:由于来自不同供应商的电子系统各不相同,在放射肿瘤学中跟踪患者剂量具有挑战性。治疗计划系统(TPS)、放射肿瘤信息系统(ROIS)和电子健康记录(EHR)缺乏统一性,使剂量跟踪和报告变得复杂。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了多个放射肿瘤学机构的做法,并提出了当前系统的指导原则:我们对不同专业团体的成员进行了调查,以了解 TPS、ROIS 和 EHR 系统中的剂量报告实践。目的是确定一致的组成部分并制定指南:结果:我们确定了六种治疗方案,在这些方案中,目前的 ROIS 默认值无法准确表示剂量总量。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种涉及三种参考点类型(主要治疗计划参考、剂量检查和处方跟踪)的标准化方法。此外,还建议对参考点进行标准化命名,以便于与电子病历集成。这种方法只需对现有系统进行最低限度的修改,并能更方便地在电子病历中传输和显示数据:结论:商业 TPS 和 ROIS 中参考点的标准化可以弥补基础设施的不足,改善复杂临床情况下的剂量跟踪。这种标准化与 AAPM 的 TG-263 保持一致,为持续开发自动化、标准化、可互操作的工具铺平了道路,从而提高了共享参考点信息的便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信