Liberation from Respiratory Support in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Matthew J Kielt, Isabella Zaniletti, Joanne M Lagatta, Michael A Padula, Theresa R Grover, Nicolas F M Porta, Erica M Wymore, Erik A Jensen, Kristen T Leeman, Jonathan C Levin, Jacquelyn R Evans, Sushmita Yallapragada, Leif D Nelin, Shilpa Vyas-Read, Karna Murthy
{"title":"Liberation from Respiratory Support in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.","authors":"Matthew J Kielt, Isabella Zaniletti, Joanne M Lagatta, Michael A Padula, Theresa R Grover, Nicolas F M Porta, Erica M Wymore, Erik A Jensen, Kristen T Leeman, Jonathan C Levin, Jacquelyn R Evans, Sushmita Yallapragada, Leif D Nelin, Shilpa Vyas-Read, Karna Murthy","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between the mode of respiratory support administered at 36 weeks' post-menstrual age (PMA) with time-to-liberation from respiratory support (LRS) in infants with grade 2/3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Daily respiratory support data were abstracted for infants born <32 weeks' gestation with grade 2/3 BPD enrolled in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database between 2017 and 2022. The main exposure was the mode of respiratory support received at 36 weeks' PMA: high flow nasal cannula >2 L/min (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), or mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was time-to-LRS, defined as the PMA when infants weaned to nasal cannula <2 L/min or room air for >2 days. The independent association between the main exposure and time-to-LRS was estimated using restricted mean survival time analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,483 included infants from 41 centers, 17% received HFNC, 36% CPAP, 16% NIPPV, and 32% MV at 36 weeks' PMA. After censoring those who died (4.2%), survived with tracheostomy (7.6%), or were transferred to another facility (7.5%), the median (IQR) time-to-LRS differed between groups: HFNC 37 [37, 39]; CPAP 39 [37, 41] NIPPV 41[39, 45]; and MV 44 [40, 48] weeks' PMA (P<0.001). Across centers, a 10-fold difference in time-to-LRS was observed after adjustment for clinical risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For infants with grade 2/3 BPD, the mode of respiratory support prescribed at 36 weeks' PMA and center of care were each associated with time-to-LRS independent of patient and clinical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the association between the mode of respiratory support administered at 36 weeks' post-menstrual age (PMA) with time-to-liberation from respiratory support (LRS) in infants with grade 2/3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Study design: Daily respiratory support data were abstracted for infants born <32 weeks' gestation with grade 2/3 BPD enrolled in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database between 2017 and 2022. The main exposure was the mode of respiratory support received at 36 weeks' PMA: high flow nasal cannula >2 L/min (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), or mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was time-to-LRS, defined as the PMA when infants weaned to nasal cannula <2 L/min or room air for >2 days. The independent association between the main exposure and time-to-LRS was estimated using restricted mean survival time analysis.

Results: Among 3,483 included infants from 41 centers, 17% received HFNC, 36% CPAP, 16% NIPPV, and 32% MV at 36 weeks' PMA. After censoring those who died (4.2%), survived with tracheostomy (7.6%), or were transferred to another facility (7.5%), the median (IQR) time-to-LRS differed between groups: HFNC 37 [37, 39]; CPAP 39 [37, 41] NIPPV 41[39, 45]; and MV 44 [40, 48] weeks' PMA (P<0.001). Across centers, a 10-fold difference in time-to-LRS was observed after adjustment for clinical risk factors.

Conclusions: For infants with grade 2/3 BPD, the mode of respiratory support prescribed at 36 weeks' PMA and center of care were each associated with time-to-LRS independent of patient and clinical characteristics.

解除支气管肺发育不良患者的呼吸支持。
目的估计月龄后 36 周(PMA)时实施的呼吸支持模式与 2/3 级支气管肺发育不良(BPD)婴儿摆脱呼吸支持(LRS)时间之间的关联:研究设计:摘录了2 L/min(HFNC)、持续气道正压(CPAP)、无创正压通气(NIPPV)或机械通气(MV)婴儿的每日呼吸支持数据。主要结果是LRS时间,即婴儿断奶至鼻插管2天时的PMA。采用限制性平均存活时间分析法估算了主要暴露与LRS时间之间的独立关联:在来自 41 个中心的 3,483 名婴儿中,有 17% 的婴儿在 36 周的 PMA 接受了 HFNC,36% 接受了 CPAP,16% 接受了 NIPPV,32% 接受了 MV。剔除死亡(4.2%)、气管切开存活(7.6%)或转院(7.5%)的婴儿后,各组婴儿的 LRS 中位数(IQR)时间不同:HFNC 37 [37, 39]周;CPAP 39 [37, 41] NIPPV 41 [39, 45]周;MV 44 [40, 48]周(PConclusions:对于 2/3 级 BPD 患儿,36 周 PMA 时开具的呼吸支持模式和护理中心均与 LRS 时间相关,与患者和临床特征无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信