Prevalence of potential drug‒drug interactions and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Yilkal Abebaw Wassie, Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Addisu Afrassa Tegegne, Wendim Ayenew, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Demis Getachew, Abebaw Setegn Yazie, Bisrat Birke Teketelew, Mekonnen Derese Mekete, Setegn Fentahun, Tesfaye Birhanu Abebe, Tefera Minwagaw, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew
{"title":"Prevalence of potential drug‒drug interactions and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Yilkal Abebaw Wassie, Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Addisu Afrassa Tegegne, Wendim Ayenew, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Demis Getachew, Abebaw Setegn Yazie, Bisrat Birke Teketelew, Mekonnen Derese Mekete, Setegn Fentahun, Tesfaye Birhanu Abebe, Tefera Minwagaw, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00386-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The occurrence of potential drug‒drug interactions (pDDIs) is a serious global issue that affects all age groups, with the elderly population being the most vulnerable. This is due to their relatively high rates of comorbidity and polypharmacy, as well as physiological changes that can increase the potential for DDIs and the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of pDDIs and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis statement was conducted on HINARI, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. Data were extracted via a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed via STATA version 11.0. Egger regression tests and funnel plot analysis were used to check publication bias, and the I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential causes of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven articles were analyzed, and a total of 1897 pDDIs were identified in 970 patients, resulting in an average of 1.97 DDIs per patient. The number of DDIs per patient ranged from 0.18 to 5.86. The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was 50.69% (95% CI 18.77-82.63%). However, the prevalence of pDDIs ranged widely from 2.80 to 90.1%. When the severity of the interactions was considered, the prevalence of potential DDIs was found to be 28.74%, 70.68%, and 34.20% for major, moderate, and minor pDDIs, respectively. Polypharmacy and long hospital stays were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was high, with a wide range of prevalence rates. Moderate-severity interactions were the most prevalent. Polypharmacy and long hospital stays were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients. The study suggests that DDIs identification database itself could have modified the DDIs prevalence rate. As a result, a single DDIs identification database needs to be authorized; otherwise, clinical knowledge should be taken into account when interpreting the information obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00386-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The occurrence of potential drug‒drug interactions (pDDIs) is a serious global issue that affects all age groups, with the elderly population being the most vulnerable. This is due to their relatively high rates of comorbidity and polypharmacy, as well as physiological changes that can increase the potential for DDIs and the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of pDDIs and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis statement was conducted on HINARI, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. Data were extracted via a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed via STATA version 11.0. Egger regression tests and funnel plot analysis were used to check publication bias, and the I2 statistic was used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential causes of heterogeneity.

Results: Seven articles were analyzed, and a total of 1897 pDDIs were identified in 970 patients, resulting in an average of 1.97 DDIs per patient. The number of DDIs per patient ranged from 0.18 to 5.86. The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was 50.69% (95% CI 18.77-82.63%). However, the prevalence of pDDIs ranged widely from 2.80 to 90.1%. When the severity of the interactions was considered, the prevalence of potential DDIs was found to be 28.74%, 70.68%, and 34.20% for major, moderate, and minor pDDIs, respectively. Polypharmacy and long hospital stays were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients in Ethiopia.

Conclusions: The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was high, with a wide range of prevalence rates. Moderate-severity interactions were the most prevalent. Polypharmacy and long hospital stays were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients. The study suggests that DDIs identification database itself could have modified the DDIs prevalence rate. As a result, a single DDIs identification database needs to be authorized; otherwise, clinical knowledge should be taken into account when interpreting the information obtained.

埃塞俄比亚老年患者中潜在药物相互作用的流行率及相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:潜在药物相互作用(pDDIs)的发生是一个严重的全球性问题,影响到所有年龄段的人群,其中老年人群最容易受到影响。这是因为他们的合并症和多种药物治疗的比例相对较高,而且生理变化也会增加发生 DDI 的可能性和药物不良反应的可能性。本研究的目的是估算埃塞俄比亚老年患者的 pDDIs 患病率及相关因素:在 HINARI、Science Direct、Embase、PubMed/MEDLINE、Google Scholar 和 Research Gate 上使用系统综述和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目进行了全面的文献检索。数据通过 Microsoft Excel 电子表格提取,并通过 STATA 11.0 版进行分析。Egger 回归检验和漏斗图分析用于检查发表偏倚,I2 统计量用于评估统计异质性。此外,还进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析,以确定异质性的潜在原因:共分析了 7 篇文章,在 970 名患者中发现了 1897 个 pDDIs,平均每名患者有 1.97 个 DDIs。每位患者的 DDIs 数量从 0.18 到 5.86 不等。老年患者中 pDDIs 的总体患病率为 50.69%(95% CI 18.77-82.63%)。然而,pDDIs 的发生率范围很广,从 2.80% 到 90.1%。在考虑相互作用的严重程度时,发现重度、中度和轻度 pDDIs 的潜在 DDIs 发生率分别为 28.74%、70.68% 和 34.20%。在埃塞俄比亚的老年患者中,多重用药和长期住院被认为是与pDDIs相关的因素:老年患者中 pDDIs 的总体患病率很高,患病率范围很广。中度程度的相互作用最为普遍。多药并用和住院时间长被认为是老年患者中出现药物间不良相互作用的相关因素。研究表明,DDIs 识别数据库本身可能会改变 DDIs 的流行率。因此,需要授权建立一个单一的 DDIs 识别数据库;否则,在解释所获得的信息时应考虑临床知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信