Valence in perception: Are affective valence and visual brightness integral dimensions in visual experience?

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Hilla Jacobson, Zohar Ongil, Daniel Algom, Marius Usher
{"title":"Valence in perception: Are affective valence and visual brightness integral dimensions in visual experience?","authors":"Hilla Jacobson, Zohar Ongil, Daniel Algom, Marius Usher","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A fundamental question in the domain of affect and conscious perception is whether the former can impact the latter. Traditionally, perception and affect were conceived as largely independent. Against this backdrop, it was recently argued that the affective valence of a stimulus can modulate the perceptual experience of its sensory features. An alternative hypothesis is that perceptual experiences have a valenced aspect over and above their sensory aspects, with these two aspects interacting and comprising integral perceptual dimensions. To test this, we carried out two experiments deploying Wendell Garner's speeded classification paradigm to decide whether visual brightness and affective valence are separable or integral dimensions.We found Garner interference, documenting that brightness and valence are integral dimensions. We did not observe effects of congruity - responses to bright positive stimuli were not faster than to bright negative stimuli - providing no support for affect induced changes in the perception of brightness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental question in the domain of affect and conscious perception is whether the former can impact the latter. Traditionally, perception and affect were conceived as largely independent. Against this backdrop, it was recently argued that the affective valence of a stimulus can modulate the perceptual experience of its sensory features. An alternative hypothesis is that perceptual experiences have a valenced aspect over and above their sensory aspects, with these two aspects interacting and comprising integral perceptual dimensions. To test this, we carried out two experiments deploying Wendell Garner's speeded classification paradigm to decide whether visual brightness and affective valence are separable or integral dimensions.We found Garner interference, documenting that brightness and valence are integral dimensions. We did not observe effects of congruity - responses to bright positive stimuli were not faster than to bright negative stimuli - providing no support for affect induced changes in the perception of brightness.

感知中的情感:情绪情感和视觉亮度是视觉体验中不可或缺的两个维度吗?
情感和有意识感知领域的一个基本问题是,前者是否会影响后者。传统上,人们认为知觉和情感在很大程度上是独立的。在此背景下,最近有一种观点认为,刺激物的情感价值可以调节对其感官特征的知觉体验。另一种假设是,知觉体验除了感官方面之外,还有情感方面,这两个方面相互作用,构成了完整的知觉维度。为了验证这一点,我们采用温德尔-加纳(Wendell Garner)的加速分类范式进行了两项实验,以确定视觉亮度和情感价位是可分离的还是不可分割的维度。我们没有观察到一致性的影响--对明亮的正面刺激的反应速度并不比对明亮的负面刺激的反应速度快--这就不支持情感会诱发亮度感知的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信