Clinical presentation, associated factors, and course of cutaneous reaction after the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination.

IF 2.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Pattriya Jirawattanadon, Charussri Leeyaphan, Pornpan Koomanachai, Phutsadee Pudchakan, Sumanas Bunyaratavej, Kanokvalai Kulthanan, Papapit Tuchinda, Thrit Hutachoke, Yanisorn Nanchaipruek, Phumithep Phumariyapong
{"title":"Clinical presentation, associated factors, and course of cutaneous reaction after the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination.","authors":"Pattriya Jirawattanadon, Charussri Leeyaphan, Pornpan Koomanachai, Phutsadee Pudchakan, Sumanas Bunyaratavej, Kanokvalai Kulthanan, Papapit Tuchinda, Thrit Hutachoke, Yanisorn Nanchaipruek, Phumithep Phumariyapong","doi":"10.7774/cevr.2024.13.4.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A booster coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was proposed to preserve immunity and prevent new variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus. The objectives of this study are to investigate clinical manifestations, associated factors and course of cutaneous reactions after the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination, compared to the recommended 1st and 2nd doses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok. Adult patients who reported cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination from April 2021 to February 2022 were included. Data were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 521 subjects with a median age of 38 years were included. Females predominated (80.2%). Most reactions were reported after receiving CoronaVac (49.1%) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (46.3%). The injection site reaction was the most reported. Twenty-one patients reported rash after the 3rd booster dose, with messenger RNA vaccines in most cases. Patients in this group had significantly fewer injection site reactions compared to those with the 1st and 2nd vaccination (70.6% vs. 91.5%) with an increasing proportion of new-onset urticaria (17.6% vs. 5.4%, p=0.023). The rash after the 3rd booster vaccination tended to have a longer duration of reactions (p=0.001). Boosting with a vaccine different from the 1st dose may not affect the reaction. Age and sex did not affect booster rash. In this study, no serious cutaneous reactions were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most adverse cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination are mild in severity, especially after booster vaccination, and should not discourage the benefits of getting vaccinated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51768,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2024.13.4.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A booster coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was proposed to preserve immunity and prevent new variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus. The objectives of this study are to investigate clinical manifestations, associated factors and course of cutaneous reactions after the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination, compared to the recommended 1st and 2nd doses.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok. Adult patients who reported cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination from April 2021 to February 2022 were included. Data were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed.

Results: A total of 521 subjects with a median age of 38 years were included. Females predominated (80.2%). Most reactions were reported after receiving CoronaVac (49.1%) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (46.3%). The injection site reaction was the most reported. Twenty-one patients reported rash after the 3rd booster dose, with messenger RNA vaccines in most cases. Patients in this group had significantly fewer injection site reactions compared to those with the 1st and 2nd vaccination (70.6% vs. 91.5%) with an increasing proportion of new-onset urticaria (17.6% vs. 5.4%, p=0.023). The rash after the 3rd booster vaccination tended to have a longer duration of reactions (p=0.001). Boosting with a vaccine different from the 1st dose may not affect the reaction. Age and sex did not affect booster rash. In this study, no serious cutaneous reactions were found.

Conclusion: Most adverse cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination are mild in severity, especially after booster vaccination, and should not discourage the benefits of getting vaccinated.

接种 COVID-19 疫苗加强剂量后皮肤反应的临床表现、相关因素和过程。
目的:建议加强接种冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫苗,以保持免疫力并预防严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 病毒的新变种。本研究的目的是调查接种COVID-19加强剂疫苗后皮肤反应的临床表现、相关因素和病程,并与推荐的第1剂和第2剂疫苗进行比较:这项回顾性队列研究在曼谷西里拉吉医院进行。研究纳入了 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 2 月期间报告接种 COVID-19 疫苗后出现皮肤反应的成人患者。研究人员从电子病历中收集数据并进行分析:结果:共纳入 521 名受试者,中位年龄为 38 岁。女性占多数(80.2%)。大多数反应发生在接受 CoronaVac(49.1%)和 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(46.3%)后。报告最多的是注射部位反应。21 名患者报告在接种第 3 次加强剂量后出现皮疹,其中大多数是信使 RNA 疫苗引起的。与接种第 1 和第 2 次疫苗的患者相比,该组患者的注射部位反应明显减少(70.6% 对 91.5%),新发荨麻疹的比例增加(17.6% 对 5.4%,P=0.023)。第 3 次加强接种后的皮疹反应持续时间往往更长(p=0.001)。接种不同于第一剂的疫苗可能不会影响反应。年龄和性别对加强接种皮疹没有影响。本研究未发现严重的皮肤反应:结论:接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的大多数皮肤不良反应,尤其是加强免疫后的皮肤不良反应,其严重程度都很轻微,不应影响接种疫苗的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clin Exp Vaccine Res, the official English journal of the Korean Vaccine Society, is an international, peer reviewed, and open-access journal. It covers all areas related to vaccines and vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine Res publishes editorials, review articles, special articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications, and correspondences covering a wide range of clinical and experimental subjects including vaccines and vaccination for human and animals against infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor. The scope of the journal is to disseminate information that may contribute to elaborate vaccine development and vaccination strategies targeting infectious diseases and tumors in human and animals. Relevant topics range from experimental approaches to (pre)clinical trials for the vaccine research based on, but not limited to, basic laboratory, translational, and (pre)clinical investigations, epidemiology of infectious diseases and progression of all aspects in the health related issues. It is published printed and open accessed online issues (https://ecevr.org) two times per year in 31 January and 31 July. Clin Exp Vaccine Res is linked to many international databases and is made freely available to institutions and individuals worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信