Palliative Homecare in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease.
Hugo M Oliveira, Céu Rocha, Maria Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes
{"title":"Palliative Homecare in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease.","authors":"Hugo M Oliveira, Céu Rocha, Maria Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes","doi":"10.1177/08258597241296116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden, integration of palliative care in ESLD is reduced, and the majority of patients continue to die in inpatient care. We aim to assess predictors and outcomes of home palliative care, as well as factors associated with death at home in patients with ESLD. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients with ESLD, followed by a palliative care team between 2017 and 2022. Information regarding patient demographics, ESLD etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors associated with home palliative care. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 75 patients: 44% had home palliative care and 33% died at home. ESLD patients with home palliative care were older (72.52 vs 64.45; <i>p</i> = 0.002), had a longer palliative care intervention time (149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 days; <i>p</i> = 0.007), higher rates of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.024; <i>p</i> = 0.029), and hepatocarcinoma (90.9% vs 64.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Patients with home palliative care had a reduction in-hospital admissions (2.61 vs 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and a greater probability of death at home (66.7% vs 33.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.000). Patients who died at home (33.3%) were older (72.20 vs 64.40; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and had longer palliative care intervention time (178.80 ± 211.78 vs 46.28 ± 99.67 days; <i>p</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusion:</b> Home palliative care in ESLD differs based on demographics and disease complications, with a positive impact of homecare translated into a reduction in hospital admissions and an increased probability of death at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"8258597241296116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241296116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden, integration of palliative care in ESLD is reduced, and the majority of patients continue to die in inpatient care. We aim to assess predictors and outcomes of home palliative care, as well as factors associated with death at home in patients with ESLD. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with ESLD, followed by a palliative care team between 2017 and 2022. Information regarding patient demographics, ESLD etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors associated with home palliative care. Results: We analyzed 75 patients: 44% had home palliative care and 33% died at home. ESLD patients with home palliative care were older (72.52 vs 64.45; p = 0.002), had a longer palliative care intervention time (149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 days; p = 0.007), higher rates of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (χ2 = 11.024; p = 0.029), and hepatocarcinoma (90.9% vs 64.3%; p = 0.007). Patients with home palliative care had a reduction in-hospital admissions (2.61 vs 1.06; p = 0.000) and a greater probability of death at home (66.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.000). Patients who died at home (33.3%) were older (72.20 vs 64.40; p = 0.000) and had longer palliative care intervention time (178.80 ± 211.78 vs 46.28 ± 99.67 days; p = 0.006). Conclusion: Home palliative care in ESLD differs based on demographics and disease complications, with a positive impact of homecare translated into a reduction in hospital admissions and an increased probability of death at home.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.