Real-world effectiveness and safety of simnotrelvir/ritonavir for COVID-19: A nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in China

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bing Han , Chunling Du , Min Deng , Renhong Tang , Jianping Dong , Xu Song , Yunfeng Qiao , Zheng Ni , WenJie Yang , Jiankun Yang , Tianxin Xiang , Yan Huang , Yu Zhong , Zhongfa Zhang , Lisheng Yang , Jikang Yang , Jinghua Wang , Lanbing Zheng , Libing Ma , Zhinan Shou , Rongmeng Jiang
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness and safety of simnotrelvir/ritonavir for COVID-19: A nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in China","authors":"Bing Han ,&nbsp;Chunling Du ,&nbsp;Min Deng ,&nbsp;Renhong Tang ,&nbsp;Jianping Dong ,&nbsp;Xu Song ,&nbsp;Yunfeng Qiao ,&nbsp;Zheng Ni ,&nbsp;WenJie Yang ,&nbsp;Jiankun Yang ,&nbsp;Tianxin Xiang ,&nbsp;Yan Huang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhong ,&nbsp;Zhongfa Zhang ,&nbsp;Lisheng Yang ,&nbsp;Jikang Yang ,&nbsp;Jinghua Wang ,&nbsp;Lanbing Zheng ,&nbsp;Libing Ma ,&nbsp;Zhinan Shou ,&nbsp;Rongmeng Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simnotrelvir has demonstrated potent anti-viral activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In a Phase II/III study, Simnotrelvir plus ritonavir (S/R, co-packaged) shortened the time to the resolution of symptoms in adult COVID-19 patients. However, real-world data on effectiveness of simnotrelvir/ritonavir against SARS-CoV-2 during XBB variant surges are still limited.</div></div><div><h3>Study design and methods</h3><div>This was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational real-world study at 42 sites in China. Adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at disease onset were eligible for participation. Patients were grouped in S/R group (treated with S/R) and control group (not receiving oral antivirals for COVID-19). The primary endpoint was the COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause mortality within 28 days. Secondary endpoints included the time from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to negative conversion, and the time to resolution of COVID-19 symptoms. Besides, serious adverse events (SAE), adverse drug reactions (ADR) and combined medication were reported. Propensity Score-Matched (PSM) analysis (1:1) was performed for adjustment for baseline variables. Hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were estimated using the Cox and Modified Poisson regression, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between June 6, 2023, and December 27, 2023, 3522 patients were enrolled. S/R was associated with a reduced incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization (6/1896 [0.3%] vs. 43/1408 [3.1%]; HR: 0.110, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.043 to 0.283, p &lt; 0.001 vs control), consistently with the results after PSM (4/1381 [0.3%] in S/R vs. 40/1381 patients [2.9%]; aRR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.29; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). No deaths occurred in both S/R and control groups. Matched Patients over 65 and patients with risk factors who received S/R achieved significantly reduced risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization (aRR: 0.032; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.268; aRR: 0.034; 95% CI: 0.005, 0.252, respectively; all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, S/R shortened the median time to viral clearance by 1 day (6.0 vs 7.0 days; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.0; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and reduced the median time to symptom resolution by 2 days (8.0 days vs 10.0 days; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.0; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Besides, the proportion of patients in the S/R group using combined medication was significantly lower than that in the control group (30.2% vs 49.4%). Subgroup analysis showed potential protective effect of S/R in the elderly and patients with more than 1 risk factor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In real world, S/R significantly reduced the incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization, demonstrated favorable safety profiles, and less use of combined medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106339"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324002731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Simnotrelvir has demonstrated potent anti-viral activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In a Phase II/III study, Simnotrelvir plus ritonavir (S/R, co-packaged) shortened the time to the resolution of symptoms in adult COVID-19 patients. However, real-world data on effectiveness of simnotrelvir/ritonavir against SARS-CoV-2 during XBB variant surges are still limited.

Study design and methods

This was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational real-world study at 42 sites in China. Adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at disease onset were eligible for participation. Patients were grouped in S/R group (treated with S/R) and control group (not receiving oral antivirals for COVID-19). The primary endpoint was the COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause mortality within 28 days. Secondary endpoints included the time from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to negative conversion, and the time to resolution of COVID-19 symptoms. Besides, serious adverse events (SAE), adverse drug reactions (ADR) and combined medication were reported. Propensity Score-Matched (PSM) analysis (1:1) was performed for adjustment for baseline variables. Hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were estimated using the Cox and Modified Poisson regression, respectively.

Results

Between June 6, 2023, and December 27, 2023, 3522 patients were enrolled. S/R was associated with a reduced incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization (6/1896 [0.3%] vs. 43/1408 [3.1%]; HR: 0.110, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.043 to 0.283, p < 0.001 vs control), consistently with the results after PSM (4/1381 [0.3%] in S/R vs. 40/1381 patients [2.9%]; aRR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.29; P < 0.001). No deaths occurred in both S/R and control groups. Matched Patients over 65 and patients with risk factors who received S/R achieved significantly reduced risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization (aRR: 0.032; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.268; aRR: 0.034; 95% CI: 0.005, 0.252, respectively; all P < 0.001). Furthermore, S/R shortened the median time to viral clearance by 1 day (6.0 vs 7.0 days; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.0; P < 0.001) and reduced the median time to symptom resolution by 2 days (8.0 days vs 10.0 days; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.0; P < 0.001). Besides, the proportion of patients in the S/R group using combined medication was significantly lower than that in the control group (30.2% vs 49.4%). Subgroup analysis showed potential protective effect of S/R in the elderly and patients with more than 1 risk factor.

Conclusion

In real world, S/R significantly reduced the incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization, demonstrated favorable safety profiles, and less use of combined medication.
辛诺雷韦/利托那韦治疗COVID-19的实际有效性和安全性:中国一项全国性、多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。
背景:辛诺雷韦(Simnotrelvir)对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)具有很强的抗病毒活性。在一项 II/III 期研究中,Simnotrelvir 加利托那韦(S/R,联合包装)缩短了 COVID-19 成年患者症状缓解的时间。然而,关于辛诺雷韦/利托那韦在XBB omicron变异体激增期间对SARS-CoV-2的有效性的实际数据仍然有限:这是一项全国性、多中心、前瞻性、观察性的真实世界研究,在中国的42个地点进行。患有轻度至中度 COVID-19 且处于发病期的成年患者均可参与研究。患者被分为S/R组(接受S/R治疗)和对照组(未接受COVID-19口服抗病毒药物治疗)。主要终点是28天内与COVID-19相关的住院或全因死亡率。次要终点包括从确诊感染 SARS-CoV-2 到转阴的时间,以及 COVID-19 症状缓解的时间。此外,还报告了严重不良事件(SAE)、药物不良反应(ADR)和合并用药情况。为调整基线变量,进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析(1:1)。采用考克斯回归和修正泊松回归分别估算了危险比(HR)和调整风险比(aRR):结果:2023 年 6 月 6 日至 2023 年 12 月 27 日期间,共有 3522 名患者入组。S/R与COVID-19相关住院的发生率降低有关(6/1896 [0.3%] vs. 43/1408 [3.1%];HR:0.110,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.043 至 0.28%):结论:在现实世界中,S/R能明显降低COVID-19相关住院的发生率,显示出良好的安全性,并减少了联合用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信