Effect of Methimazole Withdrawl Period on the I-131 Uptake Estimation Using Tc-99 m Thyroid Scanning in Graves' Disease.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hui Wang, Weijian Li, Pengpeng Chang, Qiang Jia, Jian Tan, Ruiguo Zhang
{"title":"Effect of Methimazole Withdrawl Period on the I-131 Uptake Estimation Using Tc-99 m Thyroid Scanning in Graves' Disease.","authors":"Hui Wang, Weijian Li, Pengpeng Chang, Qiang Jia, Jian Tan, Ruiguo Zhang","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of methimazole withdrawal period (MWP) on the estimation of 24-hour-radioiodine thyroid uptake (131IU24h) from 99mTc-pertechnetate thyroid uptake (99mTcTU) remains unclear for patients with Graves' disease (GD). This study aims to investigate the feasibility and reliability of 99mTcTU-based 131IU24h estimation with different MWPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 116 GD patients scheduled for 131I therapy at our hospital between April 2022 and April 2023. Based on MWP, the patients were categorized as standard (no methimazole or MWP > 1 month), MWP1 (MWP ≤ 1 week), MWP2 (MWP > 1 week to ≤2 weeks), and MWP3 (MWP > 2 weeks to <1 month). Fisher's exact test, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare variables. Fitted curves of 99mTcTU20min vs 131IU24h were plotted for the standard group. Linear relationships and Bland-Altman plots were used to illustrate the relationship and consistency between estimated and measured 131IU24h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>131IU24h was higher in the MWP1 group compared to MWP2 (70.22 ± 7.95% vs 61.92 ± 9.84%, P = .001), and thyroid mass was greater in the MWP1 group (36.15 ± 22.38 g) vs MWP3 (21.25 ± 11.90 g, P = .005). The relationship between 131IU24h and 99mTcTU20min in the standard group is described by the following algorithm: estimated 131IU24h = 11.3ln (99mTcTU20min) + 39.4 (R2 = 0.62). Based on it, the correlation between estimated and measured 131IU24h was weak in MWP1 and MWP2 (both P > .05) but strong in MWP3 (r = 0.66, P = .002). Additionally, the agreement between estimated and measured 131IU24h was highest in the MWP3 group (95% confidence interval, -15.86 to 15.52%) compared to the MWP1and MWP2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Estimated 131IU24h based on 99mTcTU is not suitable for GD patients with MWP less than 2 weeks at our institution, necessitating further prospective multicenter studies for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"2273-2279"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of methimazole withdrawal period (MWP) on the estimation of 24-hour-radioiodine thyroid uptake (131IU24h) from 99mTc-pertechnetate thyroid uptake (99mTcTU) remains unclear for patients with Graves' disease (GD). This study aims to investigate the feasibility and reliability of 99mTcTU-based 131IU24h estimation with different MWPs.

Methods: We enrolled 116 GD patients scheduled for 131I therapy at our hospital between April 2022 and April 2023. Based on MWP, the patients were categorized as standard (no methimazole or MWP > 1 month), MWP1 (MWP ≤ 1 week), MWP2 (MWP > 1 week to ≤2 weeks), and MWP3 (MWP > 2 weeks to <1 month). Fisher's exact test, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare variables. Fitted curves of 99mTcTU20min vs 131IU24h were plotted for the standard group. Linear relationships and Bland-Altman plots were used to illustrate the relationship and consistency between estimated and measured 131IU24h.

Results: 131IU24h was higher in the MWP1 group compared to MWP2 (70.22 ± 7.95% vs 61.92 ± 9.84%, P = .001), and thyroid mass was greater in the MWP1 group (36.15 ± 22.38 g) vs MWP3 (21.25 ± 11.90 g, P = .005). The relationship between 131IU24h and 99mTcTU20min in the standard group is described by the following algorithm: estimated 131IU24h = 11.3ln (99mTcTU20min) + 39.4 (R2 = 0.62). Based on it, the correlation between estimated and measured 131IU24h was weak in MWP1 and MWP2 (both P > .05) but strong in MWP3 (r = 0.66, P = .002). Additionally, the agreement between estimated and measured 131IU24h was highest in the MWP3 group (95% confidence interval, -15.86 to 15.52%) compared to the MWP1and MWP2 groups.

Conclusion: Estimated 131IU24h based on 99mTcTU is not suitable for GD patients with MWP less than 2 weeks at our institution, necessitating further prospective multicenter studies for validation.

甲巯咪唑停药期对巴塞杜氏病甲状腺 Tc-99m 扫描估算 I-131 摄取量的影响
目的:对于巴塞杜氏病(GD)患者,甲巯咪唑停药期(MWP)对从99m锝-过硫酸盐甲状腺摄取量(99m锝TU)估算24小时放射性碘甲状腺摄取量(131IU24h)的影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨不同MWPs下基于99mTcTU的131IU24h估算的可行性和可靠性:我们在 2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 4 月期间招募了 116 名计划在我院接受 131I 治疗的 GD 患者。根据MWP将患者分为:标准组(未使用甲巯咪唑或MWP>1个月)、MWP1组(MWP≤1周)、MWP2组(MWP>1周至≤2周)和MWP3组(MWP>2周至 结果:MWP1组的131IU24h高于MWP2组:MWP1组的131IU24h高于MWP2组(70.22±7.95% vs 61.92±9.84%,P=0.001),MWP1组的甲状腺肿块(36.15±22.38g)大于MWP3组(21.25±11.90g,P=0.005)。标准组 131IU24h 与 99mTcTU20min 的关系用算法描述:估计 131IU24h=11.3ln (99mTcTU20min)+39.4 (R2=0.62)。在此基础上,MWP1 组和 MWP2 组的 131IU24h 估计值与测量值之间的相关性较弱(均为 P>0.05),但 MWP3 组的相关性较强(r=0.66,P=0.002)。此外,与 MWP1 和 MWP2 组相比,MWP3 组的 131IU24h 估计值与测量值的一致性最高(95% CI,-15.86% 至 15.52%):结论:在我院,基于 99mTcTU 的 131IU24h 估计值不适合用于 MWP 小于 2 周的广东患者,需要进一步的前瞻性多中心研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信