Lack of additional benefit from slow rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia for ischaemic brain injury in near-term fetal sheep.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Alice McDouall, Kelly Q Zhou, Guido Wassink, Anthony Davies, Laura Bennet, Alistair J Gunn, Joanne O Davidson
{"title":"Lack of additional benefit from slow rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia for ischaemic brain injury in near-term fetal sheep.","authors":"Alice McDouall, Kelly Q Zhou, Guido Wassink, Anthony Davies, Laura Bennet, Alistair J Gunn, Joanne O Davidson","doi":"10.1113/JP287453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal rate of rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. Slow rewarming may reduce cardiovascular instability and rebound seizures, but there is little controlled evidence to support this. The present study aimed to determine whether slow rewarming can improve neuroprotection after 72 h of hypothermia. Fetal sheep (0.85 gestation) received sham occlusion (n = 8) or 30 min of global cerebral ischaemia followed by normothermia (n = 7), or hypothermia from 3 to 72 h with either fast, spontaneous rewarming within 1 h (n = 8) or slow rewarming at 0.5°C h<sup>-1</sup> over 10 h (n = 8). Hypothermia improved EEG and spectral edge recovery, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia reduced the number of seizures, with no significant difference in seizure activity between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia improved neuronal survival in the cortex, CA1, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia attenuated microglia counts in the cortex, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia did not affect neurophysiological recovery, neuronal survival or attenuation of microglia after global cerebral ischaemia in term-equivalent fetal sheep. KEY POINTS: The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect recovery of EEG or spectral edge. There was no difference in the occurrence of seizures as a result of the rate of rewarming after hypothermia. The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect neuronal survival in the cortex or hippocampus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal rate of rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. Slow rewarming may reduce cardiovascular instability and rebound seizures, but there is little controlled evidence to support this. The present study aimed to determine whether slow rewarming can improve neuroprotection after 72 h of hypothermia. Fetal sheep (0.85 gestation) received sham occlusion (n = 8) or 30 min of global cerebral ischaemia followed by normothermia (n = 7), or hypothermia from 3 to 72 h with either fast, spontaneous rewarming within 1 h (n = 8) or slow rewarming at 0.5°C h-1 over 10 h (n = 8). Hypothermia improved EEG and spectral edge recovery, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia reduced the number of seizures, with no significant difference in seizure activity between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia improved neuronal survival in the cortex, CA1, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia attenuated microglia counts in the cortex, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia did not affect neurophysiological recovery, neuronal survival or attenuation of microglia after global cerebral ischaemia in term-equivalent fetal sheep. KEY POINTS: The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect recovery of EEG or spectral edge. There was no difference in the occurrence of seizures as a result of the rate of rewarming after hypothermia. The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect neuronal survival in the cortex or hippocampus.

对濒死胎羊缺血性脑损伤进行治疗性低温后缓慢复温缺乏额外益处。
治疗性低温后的最佳复温速度尚不明确。缓慢复温可能会减少心血管不稳定性和癫痫反弹,但几乎没有对照证据支持这一点。本研究旨在确定缓慢复温是否能改善低体温 72 小时后的神经保护。胎羊(0.85 胎龄)接受假性闭塞(8 只)或 30 分钟全脑缺血后正常体温(7 只),或 3 至 72 小时低体温,在 1 小时内快速、自发复温(8 只)或在 10 小时内以 0.5°C h-1 的速度缓慢复温(8 只)。低温改善了脑电图和频谱边缘的恢复,快速和慢速复温之间没有显著差异。低温可减少癫痫发作次数,快速和慢速复温对癫痫发作活动无显著差异。低温提高了海马皮层、CA1、CA3、CA4 和齿状回区域的神经元存活率,快速和慢速复温之间没有明显差异。低温减少了大脑皮层的小胶质细胞数量,快速和慢速复温之间没有显著差异。临床上相关的低体温持续时间后的复温速度不会影响足月胎绵羊全脑缺血后的神经生理恢复、神经元存活或小胶质细胞数量的减少。要点:低体温 72 小时后的复温速度不会影响脑电图或频谱边缘的恢复。低体温后的复温速度对癫痫发作的发生率没有影响。低体温 72 小时后的复温速度不会影响大脑皮层或海马的神经元存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信