'Can do' versus 'Do do' in nursing home residents: identification of contextual factors discriminating groups with aligned or misaligned physical activity and physical capacity.

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Michael Adams, Alexander Elser, Madeleine Fricke, Lydia Jaufmann, Bettina Wollesen, Thomas Muehlbauer, Carl-Philipp Jansen, Michael Schwenk
{"title":"'Can do' versus 'Do do' in nursing home residents: identification of contextual factors discriminating groups with aligned or misaligned physical activity and physical capacity.","authors":"Michael Adams, Alexander Elser, Madeleine Fricke, Lydia Jaufmann, Bettina Wollesen, Thomas Muehlbauer, Carl-Philipp Jansen, Michael Schwenk","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00365-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) is fundamental to nursing home residents' health. Likewise, physical capacity (PC) is essential to carry out activities of daily living. Although PC and PA are associated, misalignment has been reported in specific subgroups. Increased PC is oftentimes not linked to high PA (i.e., Can do - don't do) and vice versa (i.e., Can't do - do do). Therefore, identifying other contextual factors influencing PA in misaligned groups is important. This study aimed to identify contextual factors in nursing home residents with aligned or misaligned PA and PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 180 nursing home residents (≥ 65 years, 79.4% females) were divided into four quadrants (Q1: Can do - do do; Q2: Can do - don't do; Q3: Can't do - do do; Q4: Can't do - don't do) based on thresholds for PA (≥ or < 2,500 steps/day) and PC (≤ or > 0.5 m/s gait speed). Kruskal-Wallis H test and effect sizes (ES) were applied to analyze quadrants' differences regarding PA (steps per day), objective motor capacity, life-space mobility, activities of daily living (ADL), psychosocial well-being, cognition, subjective mobility-related concerns, and spatial orientation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specific contextual factors differed significantly between the groups. Compared to Q1, Q2 presents a significantly lower life-space mobility (ES: 0.35) and objective motor capacity (ES: 0-36-0.49); Q3 has a lower objective motor capacity (ES: 0.55-1.10); Q4 shows lower independence in ADL (ES: 0.57), life-space mobility (ES: 0.48), subjective mobility-related concerns (ES: 0.38) and objective motor capacity (ES: 0.99-1.08). No significant group differences were found for psychosocial well-being, cognition, and spatial orientation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new insights into PA behavior of nursing home residents. Key variables linked to PA are objective motor capacity, life-space mobility, ADL, and subjective mobility-related concerns. Surprisingly, some potentially impactful variables such as cognition, orientation, and psychosocial well-being did not differ between the groups. This may suggest that these variables may not represent key targets for interventions aiming to improve PA. This study builds the foundation for further research into the underlying mechanisms behind PA behaviors and supports future efforts to plan specific, targeted interventions for nursing home residents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered at DRKS.de with registration number DRKS00021423 on April 16, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"21 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00365-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is fundamental to nursing home residents' health. Likewise, physical capacity (PC) is essential to carry out activities of daily living. Although PC and PA are associated, misalignment has been reported in specific subgroups. Increased PC is oftentimes not linked to high PA (i.e., Can do - don't do) and vice versa (i.e., Can't do - do do). Therefore, identifying other contextual factors influencing PA in misaligned groups is important. This study aimed to identify contextual factors in nursing home residents with aligned or misaligned PA and PC.

Methods: In total, 180 nursing home residents (≥ 65 years, 79.4% females) were divided into four quadrants (Q1: Can do - do do; Q2: Can do - don't do; Q3: Can't do - do do; Q4: Can't do - don't do) based on thresholds for PA (≥ or < 2,500 steps/day) and PC (≤ or > 0.5 m/s gait speed). Kruskal-Wallis H test and effect sizes (ES) were applied to analyze quadrants' differences regarding PA (steps per day), objective motor capacity, life-space mobility, activities of daily living (ADL), psychosocial well-being, cognition, subjective mobility-related concerns, and spatial orientation.

Results: Specific contextual factors differed significantly between the groups. Compared to Q1, Q2 presents a significantly lower life-space mobility (ES: 0.35) and objective motor capacity (ES: 0-36-0.49); Q3 has a lower objective motor capacity (ES: 0.55-1.10); Q4 shows lower independence in ADL (ES: 0.57), life-space mobility (ES: 0.48), subjective mobility-related concerns (ES: 0.38) and objective motor capacity (ES: 0.99-1.08). No significant group differences were found for psychosocial well-being, cognition, and spatial orientation.

Conclusions: This study provides new insights into PA behavior of nursing home residents. Key variables linked to PA are objective motor capacity, life-space mobility, ADL, and subjective mobility-related concerns. Surprisingly, some potentially impactful variables such as cognition, orientation, and psychosocial well-being did not differ between the groups. This may suggest that these variables may not represent key targets for interventions aiming to improve PA. This study builds the foundation for further research into the underlying mechanisms behind PA behaviors and supports future efforts to plan specific, targeted interventions for nursing home residents.

Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at DRKS.de with registration number DRKS00021423 on April 16, 2020.

养老院居民的 "能做 "与 "会做":识别区分体育活动和体能一致或不一致群体的环境因素。
背景:体力活动(PA)对疗养院居民的健康至关重要。同样,体能(PC)对于开展日常生活活动也至关重要。虽然体能活动和体力活动是相关联的,但据报道,在一些特定的亚群体中,体能活动和体力活动并不一致。体力活动能力的提高往往与高体力活动能力无关(即能做-不能做),反之亦然(即不能做-能做)。因此,确定影响错位群体 PA 的其他环境因素非常重要。本研究旨在确定 PA 和 PC 一致或不一致的疗养院居民的环境因素:共 180 名养老院居民(≥ 65 岁,79.4% 为女性)被分为四个象限(Q1: 能做 - 做;Q2: 能做 - 不做;Q3: 不能做 - 做;Q4:根据 PA 的阈值(≥ 或 0.5 米/秒步速)将其分为四个象限(Q1:能做 - 做;Q2:能做 - 不做;Q3:不能做 - 做;Q4:不能做 - 不做)。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验和效应量(ES)分析四象限在活动量(每天步数)、客观运动能力、生活空间移动能力、日常生活活动(ADL)、社会心理健康、认知、与移动相关的主观担忧和空间定向方面的差异:各组之间的具体环境因素差异显著。与 Q1 相比,Q2 的生活空间移动能力(ES:0.35)和客观运动能力(ES:0-36-0.49)明显较低;Q3 的客观运动能力(ES:0.55-1.10)较低;Q4 的 ADL 独立性(ES:0.57)、生活空间移动能力(ES:0.48)、主观移动相关担忧(ES:0.38)和客观运动能力(ES:0.99-1.08)均较低。在社会心理健康、认知和空间定向方面没有发现明显的群体差异:本研究为养老院居民的 PA 行为提供了新的见解。与活动量相关的关键变量包括客观运动能力、生活空间活动能力、日常活动能力以及与活动相关的主观担忧。令人惊讶的是,一些可能会产生影响的变量,如认知能力、定向力和社会心理健康在不同组别之间并无差异。这可能表明,这些变量可能并不是旨在改善活动量的干预措施的关键目标。这项研究为进一步研究锻炼行为背后的潜在机制奠定了基础,并为今后规划针对养老院居民的具体、有针对性的干预措施提供了支持:该试验于2020年4月16日在DRKS.de进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为DRKS00021423。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信