Type of insurance coverage and dental sealants among US children: findings from the National Survey of Children's Health.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.138
Lina Bahanan
{"title":"Type of insurance coverage and dental sealants among US children: findings from the National Survey of Children's Health.","authors":"Lina Bahanan","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to preventive dental services, such as dental sealants, varies based on several factors, including insurance coverage. The aim of this study was to examine the association between different types of insurance and dental sealant placement among US children. Data from the National Survey of Children Health (NSCH) cycle 2018 was analyzed. The sample size comprised 18,012 children aged 4-14 years. The main outcome was dental sealant placement in the past year (yes/no). The primary predictor was the type of insurance (public, private, both public and private, and uninsured). Bivariate and adjusted multivariate analysis was carried out to estimate weighted prevalence and adjusted odds ratios using SAS 9.4. The adjusted multivariate results showed that dental sealant use was the lowest among uninsured children compared to publicly insured children, followed by privately insured children, and finally mixed insured (public and private) children (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.86, AOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54-1.14, AOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.82, respectively). In conclusion, privately insured, mixed insured, and uninsured children had lower odds of dental sealant use compared to publicly insured children. There was a significant variation in the accessibility of dental sealants among US children based on their insurance coverage. Despite these disparities, every child should have access to dental sealants, regardless of insurance status.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"48 6","pages":"181-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to preventive dental services, such as dental sealants, varies based on several factors, including insurance coverage. The aim of this study was to examine the association between different types of insurance and dental sealant placement among US children. Data from the National Survey of Children Health (NSCH) cycle 2018 was analyzed. The sample size comprised 18,012 children aged 4-14 years. The main outcome was dental sealant placement in the past year (yes/no). The primary predictor was the type of insurance (public, private, both public and private, and uninsured). Bivariate and adjusted multivariate analysis was carried out to estimate weighted prevalence and adjusted odds ratios using SAS 9.4. The adjusted multivariate results showed that dental sealant use was the lowest among uninsured children compared to publicly insured children, followed by privately insured children, and finally mixed insured (public and private) children (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.86, AOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54-1.14, AOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.82, respectively). In conclusion, privately insured, mixed insured, and uninsured children had lower odds of dental sealant use compared to publicly insured children. There was a significant variation in the accessibility of dental sealants among US children based on their insurance coverage. Despite these disparities, every child should have access to dental sealants, regardless of insurance status.

美国儿童的保险类型和牙齿密封:全国儿童健康调查的结果。
获得预防性牙科服务(如牙齿密封剂)的机会因多种因素(包括保险范围)而异。本研究旨在探讨不同类型的保险与美国儿童牙密封剂植入之间的关联。研究分析了2018年全国儿童健康调查(NSCH)周期的数据。样本量包括 18012 名 4-14 岁的儿童。主要结果是过去一年的牙齿密封剂植入情况(是/否)。主要预测因素是保险类型(公共保险、私人保险、公共和私人保险以及无保险)。使用 SAS 9.4 进行了二元分析和调整后的多元分析,以估算加权流行率和调整后的几率比。调整后的多变量结果显示,与公共保险儿童相比,未参保儿童使用密封剂的比例最低,其次是私人保险儿童,最后是混合保险(公共和私人)儿童(调整后的几率比(AOR):0.70;95% 置信区间(CI):0.57-0.86,AOR:0.79;95% CI:0.54-1.14,AOR:0.57;95% CI:0.40-0.82)。总之,与公共保险儿童相比,私人保险儿童、混合保险儿童和无保险儿童使用密封剂的几率较低。根据保险范围的不同,美国儿童使用密封剂的机会也有很大差异。尽管存在这些差异,但无论保险状况如何,每个儿童都应该有机会使用密封剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信