Implementation of an adult life-course vaccine review service, VaxCheck, in community pharmacy: A qualitative analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Elizabeth Vernon-Wilson, Michaela L Comrie, Kyla Barrera, Molly Yang, Lisa Dolovich, Nancy M Waite, Sherilyn K D Houle
{"title":"Implementation of an adult life-course vaccine review service, VaxCheck, in community pharmacy: A qualitative analysis.","authors":"Elizabeth Vernon-Wilson, Michaela L Comrie, Kyla Barrera, Molly Yang, Lisa Dolovich, Nancy M Waite, Sherilyn K D Houle","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacists are well placed to identify and vaccinate unimmunized or under-immunized individuals who can put themselves and communities at risk of preventable disease. We designed and tested VaxCheck, a novel life-course vaccine review service that can be used to raise awareness and guide personal vaccination action plans, in community pharmacies in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the experiences of community pharmacists and staff directly involved with providing the VaxCheck service as part of initial testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were performed with pharmacy staff from 9 pharmacies who participated in the study. Interviews were conducted at baseline and following each of 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycles. Activities undertaken to perform VaxCheck were assessed. An inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify dominant themes and subthemes. Activities and descriptive codes were then correlated to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Pharmacy staff described VaxCheck activities as spanning 3 stages: (1) Promotion/offering of VaxCheck, (2) Completing the VaxCheck, and (3) Enacting recommendations and follow-up. VaxCheck activities were compatible with workflow related to delivery of other vaccines and medication reviews. Thematic analysis found 3 considerations guided VaxCheck adoption: (1) Aligning VaxCheck with workflow through flexible integration, (2) Enabling patient-oriented vaccination services, and (3) Contributing to community healthcare provision. Data aligned with all CFIR domains with strengths noted in constructs from the \"Innovation characteristics\" and \"Individuals\" domains. Barriers to implementation were identified in \"Inner setting,\" \"Outer setting,\" and \"Process\" domains, such as pharmacy workflow capacity, patient knowledge about vaccination, availability of vaccine records, and interactions with other healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community pharmacists found VaxCheck to be a valuable, accessible service that was well-received by patients and supported adult vaccination reviews and individualized recommendations. VaxCheck was compatible with pharmacy workflow but needed additional resources for sustainability and promotion with stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":" ","pages":"102294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacists are well placed to identify and vaccinate unimmunized or under-immunized individuals who can put themselves and communities at risk of preventable disease. We designed and tested VaxCheck, a novel life-course vaccine review service that can be used to raise awareness and guide personal vaccination action plans, in community pharmacies in Ontario, Canada.

Objective: To understand the experiences of community pharmacists and staff directly involved with providing the VaxCheck service as part of initial testing.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed with pharmacy staff from 9 pharmacies who participated in the study. Interviews were conducted at baseline and following each of 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycles. Activities undertaken to perform VaxCheck were assessed. An inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify dominant themes and subthemes. Activities and descriptive codes were then correlated to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Pharmacy staff described VaxCheck activities as spanning 3 stages: (1) Promotion/offering of VaxCheck, (2) Completing the VaxCheck, and (3) Enacting recommendations and follow-up. VaxCheck activities were compatible with workflow related to delivery of other vaccines and medication reviews. Thematic analysis found 3 considerations guided VaxCheck adoption: (1) Aligning VaxCheck with workflow through flexible integration, (2) Enabling patient-oriented vaccination services, and (3) Contributing to community healthcare provision. Data aligned with all CFIR domains with strengths noted in constructs from the "Innovation characteristics" and "Individuals" domains. Barriers to implementation were identified in "Inner setting," "Outer setting," and "Process" domains, such as pharmacy workflow capacity, patient knowledge about vaccination, availability of vaccine records, and interactions with other healthcare providers.

Conclusion: Community pharmacists found VaxCheck to be a valuable, accessible service that was well-received by patients and supported adult vaccination reviews and individualized recommendations. VaxCheck was compatible with pharmacy workflow but needed additional resources for sustainability and promotion with stakeholders.

在社区药房实施成人生命周期疫苗审查服务 VaxCheck:定性分析。
背景:社区药剂师非常适合识别未接种疫苗或接种疫苗不足的个人并为其接种疫苗,这些人可能会使自己和社区面临可预防疾病的风险。我们在加拿大安大略省的社区药房设计并测试了 VaxCheck,这是一种新颖的终身疫苗审查服务,可用于提高认识和指导个人疫苗接种行动计划:了解直接参与提供 VaxCheck 服务的社区药剂师和工作人员的经验,作为初步测试的一部分:对参与研究的九家药房的药剂师进行了半结构式访谈。访谈分别在基线和三个 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "质量改进周期之后进行。对为执行 VaxCheck 而开展的活动进行了评估。进行了归纳式主题分析,以确定主导主题和次主题。然后将活动和描述性代码与实施研究综合框架(CFIR)相关联。药房工作人员将 VaxCheck 活动描述为三个阶段:(1) 宣传/提供 VaxCheck,(2) 完成 VaxCheck,(3) 执行建议和后续行动。VaxCheck 活动与提供其他疫苗和药物审查的相关工作流程是一致的。专题分析发现,采用 VaxCheck 有三个考虑因素:(1) 通过灵活整合使 VaxCheck 与工作流程相一致,(2) 实现以患者为导向的疫苗接种服务,以及 (3) 为社区医疗保健服务做出贡献。数据符合 CFIR 的所有领域,其中 "创新特征 "和 "个人 "领域的构建具有优势。在 "内部环境"、"外部环境 "和 "过程 "领域发现了实施障碍,如药房工作流程能力、患者对疫苗接种的了解、疫苗记录的可用性以及与其他医疗服务提供者的互动:社区药剂师发现 VaxCheck 是一项有价值、可获得的服务,深受患者欢迎,并支持成人疫苗接种审查和个性化建议。VaxCheck 与药房工作流程兼容,但需要更多资源才能持续开展并向利益相关者推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信