Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry and mental health care: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Sara Kolding, Robert M Lundin, Lasse Hansen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard
{"title":"Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry and mental health care: a systematic review.","authors":"Sara Kolding, Robert M Lundin, Lasse Hansen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard","doi":"10.1017/neu.2024.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tools based on generative artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT have the potential to transform modern society, including the field of medicine. Due to the prominent role of language in psychiatry, e.g., for diagnostic assessment and psychotherapy, these tools may be particularly useful within this medical field. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on generative AI applications in psychiatry and mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted across three databases, and the resulting articles were screened independently by two researchers. The content, themes, and findings of the articles were qualitatively assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search and screening process resulted in the inclusion of 40 studies. The median year of publication was 2023. The themes covered in the articles were mainly mental health and well-being in general - with less emphasis on specific mental disorders (substance use disorder being the most prevalent). The majority of studies were conducted as prompt experiments, with the remaining studies comprising surveys, pilot studies, and case reports. Most studies focused on models that generate language, ChatGPT in particular.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generative AI in psychiatry and mental health is a nascent but quickly expanding field. The literature mainly focuses on applications of ChatGPT, and finds that generative AI performs well, but notes that it is limited by significant safety and ethical concerns. Future research should strive to enhance transparency of methods, use experimental designs, ensure clinical relevance, and involve users/patients in the design phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2024.50","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Tools based on generative artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT have the potential to transform modern society, including the field of medicine. Due to the prominent role of language in psychiatry, e.g., for diagnostic assessment and psychotherapy, these tools may be particularly useful within this medical field. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on generative AI applications in psychiatry and mental health.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted across three databases, and the resulting articles were screened independently by two researchers. The content, themes, and findings of the articles were qualitatively assessed.

Results: The search and screening process resulted in the inclusion of 40 studies. The median year of publication was 2023. The themes covered in the articles were mainly mental health and well-being in general - with less emphasis on specific mental disorders (substance use disorder being the most prevalent). The majority of studies were conducted as prompt experiments, with the remaining studies comprising surveys, pilot studies, and case reports. Most studies focused on models that generate language, ChatGPT in particular.

Conclusions: Generative AI in psychiatry and mental health is a nascent but quickly expanding field. The literature mainly focuses on applications of ChatGPT, and finds that generative AI performs well, but notes that it is limited by significant safety and ethical concerns. Future research should strive to enhance transparency of methods, use experimental designs, ensure clinical relevance, and involve users/patients in the design phase.

人工智能(AI)在精神病学和精神卫生保健中的应用:系统综述。
目的:基于生成式人工智能(AI)的工具(如 ChatGPT)有可能改变现代社会,包括医学领域。由于语言在精神病学(如诊断评估和心理治疗)中的重要作用,这些工具在这一医学领域可能特别有用。因此,本研究旨在系统地综述有关生成式人工智能在精神病学和心理健康领域应用的文献:我们按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行了系统综述。我们在三个数据库中进行了检索,并由两名研究人员对检索到的文章进行了独立筛选。对文章的内容、主题和结果进行了定性评估:搜索和筛选过程共纳入了 40 项研究。文章发表年份的中位数为 2023 年。文章涉及的主题主要是一般的心理健康和幸福感--较少强调特定的精神障碍(药物使用障碍最为普遍)。大多数研究都是以即时实验的形式进行的,其余研究包括调查、试点研究和病例报告。大多数研究侧重于生成语言的模型,尤其是 ChatGPT:生成式人工智能在精神病学和心理健康领域的应用刚刚起步,但发展迅速。文献主要集中在 ChatGPT 的应用上,发现生成式人工智能表现良好,但也指出其在安全性和伦理方面存在很大的局限性。未来的研究应努力提高方法的透明度,使用实验设计,确保临床相关性,并让用户/患者参与设计阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信