Effectiveness of community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions on mental health outcomes: A systematic review

IF 4.9 2区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117491

Jessie Ho-Yin Yau , Edwin Lok Yan Wong , Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa , Tianyin Liu , Gloria Hoi Yan Wong , Terry Yat Sang Lum

{"title":"Effectiveness of community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions on mental health outcomes: A systematic review","authors":"Jessie Ho-Yin Yau , Edwin Lok Yan Wong , Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa , Tianyin Liu , Gloria Hoi Yan Wong , Terry Yat Sang Lum","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Community-based participatory research (CBPR) promotes the significant involvement of community members in research, which helps increase the effectiveness of specific interventions for community members. However, no reviews have investigated the effectiveness of CBPR interventions in mental health outcomes nor the adherence level to CBPR principles. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to (1) examine the effectiveness of CBPR interventions on mental health outcomes and (2) assess the overall adherence to CBPR principles in existing mental health research. A systematic search was conducted in five databases for studies published between January 2000 and December 2022. We included 14 studies in this review based on our eligibility criteria. We assessed the effectiveness of quality appraisal and developed a four-dimensional rating scheme (degree of community involvement in the research process; level of shared decision-making between researchers and the community; level of contribution to community capacity building; level of addressing original health problems in the community) to assess the overall adherence to CBPR principles. Although CBPR interventions impacted mental well-being outcomes, research quality varied, and most studies did not adhere to CBPR principles. Future research using the rating scheme proposed in this study is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 117491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) promotes the significant involvement of community members in research, which helps increase the effectiveness of specific interventions for community members. However, no reviews have investigated the effectiveness of CBPR interventions in mental health outcomes nor the adherence level to CBPR principles. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to (1) examine the effectiveness of CBPR interventions on mental health outcomes and (2) assess the overall adherence to CBPR principles in existing mental health research. A systematic search was conducted in five databases for studies published between January 2000 and December 2022. We included 14 studies in this review based on our eligibility criteria. We assessed the effectiveness of quality appraisal and developed a four-dimensional rating scheme (degree of community involvement in the research process; level of shared decision-making between researchers and the community; level of contribution to community capacity building; level of addressing original health problems in the community) to assess the overall adherence to CBPR principles. Although CBPR interventions impacted mental well-being outcomes, research quality varied, and most studies did not adhere to CBPR principles. Future research using the rating scheme proposed in this study is recommended.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于社区的参与式研究（CBPR）干预措施对心理健康结果的影响：系统综述。

社区参与式研究（CBPR）提倡社区成员积极参与研究，这有助于提高针对社区成员的特定干预措施的有效性。然而，目前还没有任何综述调查过社区参与式研究干预对心理健康结果的有效性，也没有调查过社区参与式研究原则的遵守程度。因此，本研究的目标是：(1) 检验 CBPR 干预措施对心理健康结果的有效性；(2) 评估现有心理健康研究对 CBPR 原则的总体遵守情况。我们在五个数据库中对 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间发表的研究进行了系统性检索。根据资格标准，我们将 14 项研究纳入了本综述。我们对质量评估的有效性进行了评估，并制定了一个四维评级方案（社区参与研究过程的程度；研究人员与社区共同决策的程度；对社区能力建设的贡献程度；解决社区原有健康问题的程度），以评估CBPR原则的总体遵守情况。虽然 CBPR 干预措施对心理健康结果产生了影响，但研究质量参差不齐，大多数研究都没有遵守 CBPR 原则。建议今后的研究采用本研究提出的评级方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

5.60%

发文量

762

审稿时长

38 days

期刊介绍： Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.