Comparison of Food Selection with the National School Lunch Program Meal Pattern Guidelines and Assessment of Children's Food Intake and Waste Using Digital Photography in a School Cafeteria.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sanjoy Saha, James L Dorling, John W Apolzan, Robbie A Beyl, Keely Hawkins, Monique M LeBlanc, Corby K Martin
{"title":"Comparison of Food Selection with the National School Lunch Program Meal Pattern Guidelines and Assessment of Children's Food Intake and Waste Using Digital Photography in a School Cafeteria.","authors":"Sanjoy Saha, James L Dorling, John W Apolzan, Robbie A Beyl, Keely Hawkins, Monique M LeBlanc, Corby K Martin","doi":"10.1089/chi.2024.0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> School lunch is an important nutritious food source for children. The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) meal patterns guidelines have been established to promote healthier school lunches. This pilot study compared food selection during lunch in a school cafeteria with the NSLP meal pattern guidelines. Food intake and waste were also examined in relation to food selection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a cross-sectional design, data were collected from children in the 1st, 6th, and 10th grades from a school in the United States. The digital photography of foods method was used to assess children's food selection, intake, and waste at lunch over 3 weeks. Results were presented as percentage, frequency, and mean ± standard deviation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> About 48 children from 1st grade, 47 from 6th grade, and 50 from 10th grade participated each day. Food selection in these grades consistently fell below the NSLP guidelines, with 69%, 79.8%, and 86.9% of children selecting less than the guidelines for energy, respectively. On average, only 10.4% of children selected vegetables at or above the guidelines. About 41% of the selected energy, 43% of fruits, 43% of vegetables, and 56% of milk were discarded as plate waste across all grades. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Selection of energy and vegetables was consistently below the NSLP guidelines, yet almost half of the selected fruits, vegetables, and milk were wasted by children. Initiatives to enhance meal quality and variety, along with nutrition education interventions and school policies, are needed to improve food selection and intake and reduce food waste.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2024.0300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: School lunch is an important nutritious food source for children. The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) meal patterns guidelines have been established to promote healthier school lunches. This pilot study compared food selection during lunch in a school cafeteria with the NSLP meal pattern guidelines. Food intake and waste were also examined in relation to food selection. Methods: In a cross-sectional design, data were collected from children in the 1st, 6th, and 10th grades from a school in the United States. The digital photography of foods method was used to assess children's food selection, intake, and waste at lunch over 3 weeks. Results were presented as percentage, frequency, and mean ± standard deviation. Results: About 48 children from 1st grade, 47 from 6th grade, and 50 from 10th grade participated each day. Food selection in these grades consistently fell below the NSLP guidelines, with 69%, 79.8%, and 86.9% of children selecting less than the guidelines for energy, respectively. On average, only 10.4% of children selected vegetables at or above the guidelines. About 41% of the selected energy, 43% of fruits, 43% of vegetables, and 56% of milk were discarded as plate waste across all grades. Conclusions: Selection of energy and vegetables was consistently below the NSLP guidelines, yet almost half of the selected fruits, vegetables, and milk were wasted by children. Initiatives to enhance meal quality and variety, along with nutrition education interventions and school policies, are needed to improve food selection and intake and reduce food waste.

比较学校食堂的食物选择与全国学校午餐计划膳食模式指南,并使用数码摄影评估儿童的食物摄入量和浪费情况。
背景:学校午餐是儿童重要的营养食品来源。国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)膳食模式指南的制定旨在促进学校午餐更加健康。这项试点研究将学校食堂午餐时的食物选择与 NSLP 餐食模式指南进行了比较。此外,还研究了食物摄入量和浪费与食物选择的关系。研究方法采用横断面设计,从美国一所学校的一年级、六年级和十年级学生中收集数据。采用食物数码摄影法对儿童在三周内午餐时的食物选择、摄入量和浪费情况进行了评估。结果以百分比、频率和平均值 ± 标准差表示。结果每天约有 48 名一年级学生、47 名六年级学生和 50 名十年级学生参加。这些年级的学生选择的食物一直低于国家学生补充计划的指导标准,分别有 69%、79.8% 和 86.9% 的学生选择的能量低于指导标准。平均只有 10.4% 的儿童选择的蔬菜达到或超过了指导标准。在所有年级中,约有 41% 的所选能量、43% 的水果、43% 的蔬菜和 56% 的牛奶作为餐盘垃圾被丢弃。结论能量和蔬菜的选择始终低于《国家学生营养计划》的指导标准,但儿童浪费了近一半的水果、蔬菜和牛奶。需要采取提高膳食质量和增加膳食种类的措施,以及营养教育干预和学校政策,来改善食物的选择和摄入,减少食物浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信