Participatory Action Research and Knowledge Dissemination in Virtual Photovoice: Methodological Insights.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
John L Oliffe, Nina Gao, Calvin C Fernandez, Matthew Sha, Celene Y L Yap, Paul Sharp, Sarah McKenzie
{"title":"Participatory Action Research and Knowledge Dissemination in Virtual Photovoice: Methodological Insights.","authors":"John L Oliffe, Nina Gao, Calvin C Fernandez, Matthew Sha, Celene Y L Yap, Paul Sharp, Sarah McKenzie","doi":"10.1177/10497323241290956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the methodological spread of virtual photovoice, alignments to and potential advances for the participatory action research (PAR) and knowledge dissemination (KD) components of in-person photovoice are poorly understood. Detailing the PAR and KD processes, practices, and products drawn from a virtual photovoice study examining men's experiences of and perspectives about equitable intimate partner relationships, the current article offers three thematic findings. The first theme <i>Processes and pragmatics for selecting representative photographs</i> describes adapting established analytics of preview, review, and cross-photo comparisons to categorize and select images from a large collection of participant-produced photographs (<i>n</i> = 714). Specifically, detailed are the reconciling of researchers deciding which images and accompanying narratives to include guided by PAR principles. Theme 2, <i>Democratizing and disrupting in-person PAR with virtual focus group polls (VFGPs)</i>, chronicles participant voting through Zoom to collectively decide and subsequently discuss their favorite photographs. While anonymity for the poll was democratizing in terms of participant equality for voting on the photographs, connecting men virtually from diverse locales could differentiate cultural norms. The third theme <i>KD pledges and pitfalls with online photovoice exhibitions</i> details the potential benefits and challenges for reaching diverse end-users. Evident was the importance of marketing and media for driving traffic to the online exhibition, and the centrality of interactivity for fostering engagement to build and adjust photovoice e-health interventions. With virtual photovoice continuing to grow in popularity post COVID-19, this article offers important methodological lessons for adapting and advancing components of in-person PAR and KD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241290956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241290956","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the methodological spread of virtual photovoice, alignments to and potential advances for the participatory action research (PAR) and knowledge dissemination (KD) components of in-person photovoice are poorly understood. Detailing the PAR and KD processes, practices, and products drawn from a virtual photovoice study examining men's experiences of and perspectives about equitable intimate partner relationships, the current article offers three thematic findings. The first theme Processes and pragmatics for selecting representative photographs describes adapting established analytics of preview, review, and cross-photo comparisons to categorize and select images from a large collection of participant-produced photographs (n = 714). Specifically, detailed are the reconciling of researchers deciding which images and accompanying narratives to include guided by PAR principles. Theme 2, Democratizing and disrupting in-person PAR with virtual focus group polls (VFGPs), chronicles participant voting through Zoom to collectively decide and subsequently discuss their favorite photographs. While anonymity for the poll was democratizing in terms of participant equality for voting on the photographs, connecting men virtually from diverse locales could differentiate cultural norms. The third theme KD pledges and pitfalls with online photovoice exhibitions details the potential benefits and challenges for reaching diverse end-users. Evident was the importance of marketing and media for driving traffic to the online exhibition, and the centrality of interactivity for fostering engagement to build and adjust photovoice e-health interventions. With virtual photovoice continuing to grow in popularity post COVID-19, this article offers important methodological lessons for adapting and advancing components of in-person PAR and KD.

虚拟摄影之声中的参与式行动研究和知识传播:方法论启示。
尽管虚拟照片选择(photovoice)在方法论上得到了推广,但人们对其与参与式行动研究(PAR)和亲身照片选择(photovoice)的知识传播(KD)部分的一致性和潜在进展却知之甚少。本文详细介绍了参与式行动研究(PAR)和知识传播研究(KD)的过程、实践和产品,这些过程、实践和产品来自于一项虚拟摄影选择研究,该研究考察了男性对平等亲密伴侣关系的体验和观点,本文提供了三个主题性发现。第一个主题是选择具有代表性的照片的过程和实用方法,描述了如何调整预览、审查和交叉照片比较的既定分析方法,以便从参与者制作的大量照片(n = 714)中对图片进行分类和选择。具体而言,详细介绍了研究人员在 PAR 原则指导下决定纳入哪些图片和附带叙述的调和过程。主题 2 "通过虚拟焦点小组投票(VFGPs)实现现场 PAR 的民主化并对其进行干扰 "记录了参与者通过 Zoom 进行投票,集体决定并随后讨论他们最喜欢的照片。虽然投票的匿名性在参与者就照片进行投票的平等性方面是民主化的,但将来自不同地方的男性虚拟地联系在一起可能会区分文化规范。第三个主题 "KD 承诺与陷阱 "详细介绍了在线摄影舆论展览在接触不同最终用户方面的潜在好处和挑战。营销和媒体对于推动在线展览流量的重要性以及互动性对于促进参与以建立和调整摄影舆论电子健康干预措施的核心作用显而易见。随着 COVID-19 后虚拟照片舆论的不断普及,本文为调整和推进现场 PAR 和 KD 的组成部分提供了重要的方法论经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信