How Doctors Talk About Medical Errors: A Qualitative Study of Junior Doctors' Experiences.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jane Ege Møller, Linda Marie Kai, Mads Skipper, Maja Bertz Hansen, Flemming Randsbæk, Signe Schlichting Matthiesen, Bente Vigh Malling
{"title":"How Doctors Talk About Medical Errors: A Qualitative Study of Junior Doctors' Experiences.","authors":"Jane Ege Møller, Linda Marie Kai, Mads Skipper, Maja Bertz Hansen, Flemming Randsbæk, Signe Schlichting Matthiesen, Bente Vigh Malling","doi":"10.1177/10497323241286037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the last three decades, an increased amount of research on errors in health care has been conducted. Studies show that physicians find it challenging to handle errors because of the blame and guilt that errors cause. Communicating with colleagues has been identified as vital for coping with errors and for creating a just culture; however, many physicians do not usually discuss their errors. Knowledge about how junior doctors experience errors is vital to ensure that they both receive emotional support and learn from errors. To capture junior doctors' perceptions and experiences, we used a qualitative, exploratory design based on virtual focus groups. We conducted seven virtual focus groups with 22 junior doctors from 11 specialties. We defined three main themes: (1) how the junior doctors conceptualized medical errors, (2) how they experienced talk about errors among colleagues, and (3) the context in which this talk took place. The participants experienced errors as challenging elements in their working life; however, they struggled to define it. They described inconsistencies regarding the reasons for discussing errors within the learning environment, with some being experienced as constructive (providing education and support) and some as destructive (involving blame and shame). There was a discrepancy between the wish to normalize error and the lack of sharing between colleagues. Our study shows that error in health care is a complex phenomenon that challenges junior doctors' navigation in clinical practice. Despite efforts to implement an open and just culture, this has not yet been achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241286037"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241286037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last three decades, an increased amount of research on errors in health care has been conducted. Studies show that physicians find it challenging to handle errors because of the blame and guilt that errors cause. Communicating with colleagues has been identified as vital for coping with errors and for creating a just culture; however, many physicians do not usually discuss their errors. Knowledge about how junior doctors experience errors is vital to ensure that they both receive emotional support and learn from errors. To capture junior doctors' perceptions and experiences, we used a qualitative, exploratory design based on virtual focus groups. We conducted seven virtual focus groups with 22 junior doctors from 11 specialties. We defined three main themes: (1) how the junior doctors conceptualized medical errors, (2) how they experienced talk about errors among colleagues, and (3) the context in which this talk took place. The participants experienced errors as challenging elements in their working life; however, they struggled to define it. They described inconsistencies regarding the reasons for discussing errors within the learning environment, with some being experienced as constructive (providing education and support) and some as destructive (involving blame and shame). There was a discrepancy between the wish to normalize error and the lack of sharing between colleagues. Our study shows that error in health care is a complex phenomenon that challenges junior doctors' navigation in clinical practice. Despite efforts to implement an open and just culture, this has not yet been achieved.

医生如何谈论医疗事故?对初级医生经历的定性研究。
在过去的三十年中,对医疗保健中的错误进行了越来越多的研究。研究表明,由于错误导致的自责和内疚,医生在处理错误时感到非常棘手。与同事沟通被认为是应对差错和创建公正文化的关键;然而,许多医生通常不会讨论他们的差错。了解低年资医生如何经历错误对于确保他们获得情感支持和从错误中学习至关重要。为了了解初级医生的看法和经历,我们采用了基于虚拟焦点小组的定性探索设计。我们与来自 11 个专科的 22 名初级医生进行了 7 次虚拟焦点小组讨论。我们确定了三大主题:(1) 初级医生如何看待医疗差错,(2) 他们如何体验同事之间谈论差错,(3) 谈话发生的背景。参与者认为医疗差错是其工作生活中具有挑战性的因素,但他们很难对其进行定义。他们对在学习环境中讨论错误的原因的描述不一致,有的认为是建设性的(提供教育和支持),有的认为是破坏性的(涉及指责和羞辱)。将错误正常化的愿望与同事之间缺乏分享之间存在差异。我们的研究表明,医疗保健中的错误是一个复杂的现象,它对初级医生在临床实践中的导航能力提出了挑战。尽管我们努力营造一种开放、公正的文化,但这一目标尚未实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信