Respiratory Specialist Visits Before Admissions with COPD Exacerbation are Linked to Improved Management and Outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ariel Melloul, Ophir Freund, Boaz Tiran, Tal Moshe Perluk, Netanel Golan, Eyal Kleinhendler, Evgeni Gershman, Avraham Unterman, Avishay Elis, Amir Bar-Shai
{"title":"Respiratory Specialist Visits Before Admissions with COPD Exacerbation are Linked to Improved Management and Outcomes.","authors":"Ariel Melloul, Ophir Freund, Boaz Tiran, Tal Moshe Perluk, Netanel Golan, Eyal Kleinhendler, Evgeni Gershman, Avraham Unterman, Avishay Elis, Amir Bar-Shai","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S491447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) significantly impact disease progression and mortality. Visiting a respiratory specialist (RS) in proximity to the exacerbation may lead to prompt treatment and improved outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between an RS visit 30-days before admission and exacerbation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The prospective study included subjects that were hospitalized with ECOPD between 2017 and 2019 in 13 medical centers. Pre-admission, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes were assessed and compared between patients with and without a 30-day RS visit, using propensity score matching. A sub-group analysis was performed based on the reason for the RS visit (emergent vs regular follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and forty-four subjects were included, and 105 (31%) had pre-admission RS visit (RS group). Before matching, indicators of severe COPD were prevalent in the RS group, while after matching there were no differences. RS visits were associated with pre-hospital initiation of short acting bronchodilators (50% vs 36%), antibiotics (30% vs 17%), and systemic steroids (38% vs 22%). The RS group had longer duration between first symptoms to hospital arrival (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.01) and shorter hospital length-of-stay (median 4 vs 5 days, p = 0.04). In-hospital and 30-days outcomes were similar between the groups. However, a non-emergent pre-hospital RS visit was associated with improved in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine RS visits could lead to correct and early treatment for ECOPD with a potential for improved outcomes. These findings highlight the need for available specialists and higher awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2387-2396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S491447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) significantly impact disease progression and mortality. Visiting a respiratory specialist (RS) in proximity to the exacerbation may lead to prompt treatment and improved outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between an RS visit 30-days before admission and exacerbation outcomes.

Patients and methods: The prospective study included subjects that were hospitalized with ECOPD between 2017 and 2019 in 13 medical centers. Pre-admission, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes were assessed and compared between patients with and without a 30-day RS visit, using propensity score matching. A sub-group analysis was performed based on the reason for the RS visit (emergent vs regular follow-up).

Results: Three hundred and forty-four subjects were included, and 105 (31%) had pre-admission RS visit (RS group). Before matching, indicators of severe COPD were prevalent in the RS group, while after matching there were no differences. RS visits were associated with pre-hospital initiation of short acting bronchodilators (50% vs 36%), antibiotics (30% vs 17%), and systemic steroids (38% vs 22%). The RS group had longer duration between first symptoms to hospital arrival (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.01) and shorter hospital length-of-stay (median 4 vs 5 days, p = 0.04). In-hospital and 30-days outcomes were similar between the groups. However, a non-emergent pre-hospital RS visit was associated with improved in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.

Conclusion: Routine RS visits could lead to correct and early treatment for ECOPD with a potential for improved outcomes. These findings highlight the need for available specialists and higher awareness.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化患者入院前呼吸科专家会诊与改善管理和疗效有关。
目的:慢性阻塞性肺病(ECOPD)加重对疾病进展和死亡率有重大影响。在病情加重时就近就诊呼吸专科医师(RS)可能有助于及时治疗并改善预后。我们旨在评估入院前 30 天到呼吸专科就诊与病情加重结果之间的关系:这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2017 年至 2019 年期间在 13 个医疗中心因 ECOPD 住院的受试者。采用倾向得分匹配法对入院前、院内和 30 天的预后进行评估,并对 30 天内进行过 RS 访问的患者和未进行过 RS 访问的患者进行比较。根据进行 RS 访问的原因(紧急访问与定期随访)进行了分组分析:结果:共纳入 344 名受试者,其中 105 人(31%)在入院前接受过 RS 检查(RS 组)。配对前,RS 组中严重慢性阻塞性肺病的指标较高,而配对后则无差异。RS 就诊与院前开始使用短效支气管扩张剂(50% 对 36%)、抗生素(30% 对 17%)和全身类固醇(38% 对 22%)有关。RS 组从首次出现症状到到达医院的时间更长(中位数为 5 天 vs 3 天,p < 0.01),住院时间更短(中位数为 4 天 vs 5 天,p = 0.04)。两组患者的住院和 30 天疗效相似。然而,非紧急的院前 RS 访问与住院和 30 天预后的改善有关:常规 RS 访问可为 ECOPD 提供正确的早期治疗,并有可能改善预后。这些研究结果突出表明,需要有可用的专家和更高的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信