Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1037/emo0001438
Andrei Patrichi, Raluca Rîmbu, Andrei C Miu, Aurora Szentágotai-Tătar
{"title":"Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review.","authors":"Andrei Patrichi, Raluca Rîmbu, Andrei C Miu, Aurora Szentágotai-Tătar","doi":"10.1037/emo0001438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic loneliness has been associated with increased risk for multiple mental disorders. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that problems with emotion regulation (ER) may underlie the course and costs of loneliness, but evidence on the associations between loneliness and ER has not been systematically analyzed until now. The present meta-analysis examined the relations between loneliness and multiple dimensions of ER including the habitual use of common strategies (i.e., rumination, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, distraction), ER difficulties, and ER abilities. A systematic search across four databases returned 4,454 articles, out of which 61 articles (total <i>N</i> = 40,641) were eligible for inclusion. The analyses indicated that there were consistent positive relations between loneliness and rumination (<i>r</i> = 0.38), suppression (<i>r</i> = 0.31), and ER difficulties (<i>r</i> = 0.49). Loneliness was also negatively associated with reappraisal (<i>r</i> = -0.23), distraction (<i>r</i> = -0.21), and ER abilities (<i>r</i> = -0.28). The latter two effects were significantly larger in studies on adults compared to adolescents, as indicated by subgroup analyses, and corroborated by metaregressions. Furthermore, the percentage of women in the sample was a negative predictor of the association between loneliness and ER difficulties, and the country cultural individualism was a positive predictor of the association between loneliness and suppression. There was evidence of publication bias in all analyses, but the effect sizes remained significant after imputing for missing studies. Overall, the present results support consistent associations between loneliness and ER and highlight potential targets for future interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic loneliness has been associated with increased risk for multiple mental disorders. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that problems with emotion regulation (ER) may underlie the course and costs of loneliness, but evidence on the associations between loneliness and ER has not been systematically analyzed until now. The present meta-analysis examined the relations between loneliness and multiple dimensions of ER including the habitual use of common strategies (i.e., rumination, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, distraction), ER difficulties, and ER abilities. A systematic search across four databases returned 4,454 articles, out of which 61 articles (total N = 40,641) were eligible for inclusion. The analyses indicated that there were consistent positive relations between loneliness and rumination (r = 0.38), suppression (r = 0.31), and ER difficulties (r = 0.49). Loneliness was also negatively associated with reappraisal (r = -0.23), distraction (r = -0.21), and ER abilities (r = -0.28). The latter two effects were significantly larger in studies on adults compared to adolescents, as indicated by subgroup analyses, and corroborated by metaregressions. Furthermore, the percentage of women in the sample was a negative predictor of the association between loneliness and ER difficulties, and the country cultural individualism was a positive predictor of the association between loneliness and suppression. There was evidence of publication bias in all analyses, but the effect sizes remained significant after imputing for missing studies. Overall, the present results support consistent associations between loneliness and ER and highlight potential targets for future interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

孤独与情绪调节:荟萃分析综述
长期孤独与多种精神障碍的风险增加有关。多种证据表明,情绪调节(ER)问题可能是孤独感的过程和代价的基础,但有关孤独感与ER之间关系的证据到目前为止尚未得到系统分析。本荟萃分析研究了孤独感与情绪调节的多个维度之间的关系,包括常用策略的习惯性使用(即反刍、认知再评价、表达抑制、分心)、情绪调节困难和情绪调节能力。通过对四个数据库进行系统检索,共检索到 4,454 篇文章,其中 61 篇(总 N = 40,641)符合纳入条件。分析表明,孤独感与反刍(r = 0.38)、压抑(r = 0.31)和应急反应困难(r = 0.49)之间存在一致的正相关关系。孤独感还与重新评价(r = -0.23)、分心(r = -0.21)和应急反应能力(r = -0.28)呈负相关。亚组分析表明,与青少年相比,后两种效应在针对成年人的研究中明显更大,元回归也证实了这一点。此外,女性在样本中所占的比例是孤独感与应急反应困难之间关联的负向预测因子,而国家文化个人主义则是孤独感与压抑之间关联的正向预测因子。所有分析都存在发表偏倚的证据,但在对缺失研究进行归因后,效应大小仍然显著。总之,本研究结果支持孤独感与ER之间存在一致的关联,并强调了未来干预的潜在目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信