{"title":"Beyond body image: Self-face recognition and negative self-face evaluations in women at high risk for an eating disorder","authors":"Jade Portingale, Isabel Krug, David Butler","doi":"10.1002/erv.3150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although one's face represents a core aspect of one's physical appearance, it remains underexplored in eating disorder (ED) populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The current study examined whether self-face recognition accuracy and evaluations differ in those at high (vs. low) ED risk. We also explored whether recognition accuracy and evaluations are related, and whether this relationship is moderated by ED risk status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials & Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants included 222 women of East/Southeast Asian (61%) and Caucasian (39%) ethnicity, stratified into low-ED-risk (<i>n</i> = 124) and high-ED-risk (<i>n</i> = 98). Participants completed measures of self-face recognition accuracy (difficulty recognizing their face and sensitivity to seeing their facial image) and evaluations (including perceived facial adiposity and attractiveness, and head dissatisfaction).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Partially consistent with hypotheses, regression analyses revealed that participants at high (vs. low) risk showed poorer self-face recognition accuracy (greater difficulty) and more negative self-face evaluations (higher perceived adiposity, lower perceived attractiveness, greater head dissatisfaction). However, ED risk was not significantly associated with self-face recognition sensitivity. Inconsistent with expectations, whilst greater self-face recognition difficulty was associated with more negative self-face evaluations, ED risk failed to moderate such effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion & Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest the potential value of considering face and body image disturbances in ED research and interventions. Further research is encouraged.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"374-389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Although one's face represents a core aspect of one's physical appearance, it remains underexplored in eating disorder (ED) populations.
Aims
The current study examined whether self-face recognition accuracy and evaluations differ in those at high (vs. low) ED risk. We also explored whether recognition accuracy and evaluations are related, and whether this relationship is moderated by ED risk status.
Materials & Methods
Participants included 222 women of East/Southeast Asian (61%) and Caucasian (39%) ethnicity, stratified into low-ED-risk (n = 124) and high-ED-risk (n = 98). Participants completed measures of self-face recognition accuracy (difficulty recognizing their face and sensitivity to seeing their facial image) and evaluations (including perceived facial adiposity and attractiveness, and head dissatisfaction).
Results
Partially consistent with hypotheses, regression analyses revealed that participants at high (vs. low) risk showed poorer self-face recognition accuracy (greater difficulty) and more negative self-face evaluations (higher perceived adiposity, lower perceived attractiveness, greater head dissatisfaction). However, ED risk was not significantly associated with self-face recognition sensitivity. Inconsistent with expectations, whilst greater self-face recognition difficulty was associated with more negative self-face evaluations, ED risk failed to moderate such effects.
Discussion & Conclusion
Findings suggest the potential value of considering face and body image disturbances in ED research and interventions. Further research is encouraged.
背景:目的:本研究探讨了自我面部识别的准确性和评价在饮食失调(ED)高风险(与低风险)人群中是否存在差异。我们还探讨了识别准确性和评价是否相关,以及这种关系是否受 ED 风险状况的调节:参与者包括222名东亚/东南亚(61%)和白种(39%)女性,分为低ED风险(124人)和高ED风险(98人)。参与者完成了自我面部识别准确性(识别自己面部的难度和看到自己面部形象的敏感度)和评价(包括感知到的面部脂肪和吸引力以及头部不满意度)的测量:回归分析表明,高风险(与低风险)参与者的自我面部识别准确率较低(识别难度较大),自我面部评价较负面(感知脂肪含量较高、感知吸引力较低、头部不满意度较高),这与假设部分吻合。然而,ED 风险与自我面部识别敏感度并无明显关联。与预期不符的是,虽然自我面孔识别难度越大,自我面孔评价越负面,但ED风险未能缓和这种影响:研究结果表明,在 ED 研究和干预中考虑面部和身体形象障碍具有潜在价值。我们鼓励进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.